in an interview with sunry, shunok said that london is ready to withdraw from the european court of human rights if this is the case. will help stop the flow of illegal migrants into the country. i believe that our plans are consistent with all our international obligations, including interaction with the cap. but i also believe that border security and the fight against illegal migration are more important than our membership in any foreign court. the reason for such statements was the decision of the european court of justice, which in 2009 prevented the deportation of illegal immigrants from britain to rwanda under an agreement with the african republic. london’s tough position on migration policy, and therefore membership in the echr, is also supported by rome. last year, both countries entered into agreements to fund the voluntary return of illegal immigrants to north africa and the middle east. sunak's statement today dutch mep marcel de graavk also supported this. he said the echr had become a playground for far-left marxists and called for the judicial body to be abolished altoget

ri shunok directly says that it’s all over.e transferring industry to military rails. he's actually proud of it, come to think of it, right? the country that decides that it sends all its migrants to rwanda. that is, this is an absolutely colonial, phenomenally vile decision. and everyone around says: no, everything is fine. yes, that’s it, they are de facto creating concentration camps. let me remind you that it is the british who are. the fathers of the concentration camps, it was with these scum that it started, that this is exactly how it was during the boer war, the first concentration camps appeared during the boer war, concentration camps appeared in the american civil war, no, the first concentration camps, and not internment camps, just like concentration camps, appeared then during the anglo-burgian war, listen to rish sunik, i want to talk to you about how we... such as russia, iran, north korea and china, everything more aggressive. these problems seem far away, but they are not. they pose a real threat to the secur

use the money from the ukrainian fund, this is, by the way , a separate fund from the money that ri shunoked, this is the money that the northern countries under the leadership of great britain collect, that is, imagine, instead of to say that this is a unique case, they... the night that they spend not enough for ukraine, slowly, we need more and faster, well, this is another motive of the election campaign, if in america the republicans say to the democrats, you give a lot of money to other countries, and need to think about america, then the great britain says, no, you are not helping much, because this is the security of great britain, well, so that britain is closer, it is simply closer, it is true, although traditionally they are also libertarians due to many geographical and other reasons, but they understood , who can't do anything, can't come to an agreement with this tyrant, everyone has to... listen, even the decision of the decider that i guarantee government procurement for british military companies, it means that, well, what we tell ourselves that we need to get on the rails