shuster , so in the magazine tym. we understand that the article is not very pleasant, but taking into account the fact that it caused such a stir not only in ukraine, i think that in many other offices as well, well, i think it is worth some attention, i.e. i won't rate it like that tell the biography of mr. shuster, although there are questions about it, i will not so to speak suggest that someone could motivate him to write in this way, but there are several such rather unpleasant, alarming bells, and i repeat, the key story is resonance , which she caused, hence fatigue from ukraine, about which he persistently asserts, citing even sociological studies in the united states, therefore now zatsi, shuster's article, and, accordingly, sociology, about 41% of americans want congress added more weapons to kyiv, compared to 65% in june, when ukraine launched a major counteroffensive, quoting shuster further, this offensive continued at an intolerable pace and with huge losses, which made it increasingly difficult for zel

this is not the first article by time journalist simon shuster about ukraine.nsky since the time of the large-scale invasion, he writes a lot, what is known about himself. simon, a profile publication about the media, the copper detector notes that simon schuster a native of moscow, he worked in russia and ukraine for more than 15 years, reporting from both countries. he lives now in new york, but spends a lot of time in kyiv. editor-in-chief oleh bazar on his facebook also drew attention to the fact that shuster had long been critical of the azov regiment. in 2021, many people wrote an article about thousands of neo-nazis who were allegedly trained in ukraine and were the central figures in this material. it was paul kazov and the founder of the battalion, andrii biletskyi. in short, the main theses of the material they look exactly like this, there has been no reaction from the ukrainian side to this, katya. i hope that now we will receive the reaction of the ukrainian side on the air. thank you, oleg, oleg halyv, briefly with what the journalist wrote in tim

the fact that ukrainian politicians had the honor of going on air to russian presenters, to savik shusterr wanted to come to vitaly portnikov, as much as politicians, and vitaly says that, too. due to the fact that i did not speak russian, that is, i spoke ukrainian on my broadcasts, and the parliamentary political forces were proud of the fact that they went to zhenya kisilyova and savik shuster and could do things for themselves there, build up political capital, and to our ukrainian presenters were prevented from leaving by this secondary complex, almond syndrome, and so on and that's why, that's why we feel deeply provincial and we still do, even during the war , you look, you look at youtube trends, you look, they've improved a lot, but just music platforms, youtube searches tell us that the problem still exists and will remain for a very long time, this is the post -post-colonial syndrome, which we are now all overcoming together in turbo mode, but it will still be a very long time. for a long time, that's why it's not globalization, but the almond syndrome, the post-colonial syndro

minutes, but i want your brief opinion, well, briefly, your opinion regarding this article by simon shuster in time magazine, what about zelensky , about the general situation in ukraine, the war, many people blame simon shuster, it is probably not without reason that he, well, you can call him a pro-russian journalist, but if everything was so well, i think that he would not dare to write, what he wrote, how do you rate this material, well i would say that it is actually 50, that is to rate that this material is 100%, what is in this material it's 100% about how it really is, i would i wouldn't say that, because this material is really manipulative, let's be honest, there is a whole series of manipulative things that most likely do not completely correspond to reality, that is, on certain facts that probably really exist, they were layered on them emotionally, emotionally and with such a slightly hyperbolic component, but there really are questions that need to be answered, we really see now that a certain informational, at least, fatigue from ukraine, it exists in the world, that is, info

first person to react to it was the head of the president’s office, yarmak, well, he sees, simon shusterobably asked around himself ermak and his employees, because the entire large article is based on the stories of these very employees, that is, the office of the president of ukraine, and ermak immediately joyfully lays it out like this - a very important report, which means a very important report, well, i recommend it, look, yes, some kind of that time, apparently they gave him something to read, i see, he quietly wrote his own, his recommendation... for some reason he cleared it out, because he read what was written there, and you know, it’s really very revealing and the cover is so composed, zelsky seemed to return to the first stripes, he hasn't been around for a long time on the covers of western magazines, but you can see the form in which he is drawn here, and from the back, as if everything is already gone somewhere , looking around, the key word is really highlighted here, as if a quote from zelsky, yes, no one believes in our victory, like me, and then in big, huge... letter

discussed in ukrainian society, i will point out for the audience that this is an article by simon shustern the time magazine, he analyzes the situation, the prospects for ukraine there, and i think that most of our viewers have already watched it, or at least read about it in other media, and what are yours, how correctly do you think what is happening at the front in the ukrainian political system is described? how correctly it describes what happens at the meetings of the stake or in the offices of the president's office, i cannot assess, because i am not a member of the stake, i do not attend the meetings of the national security council or the meetings of the stake there, so say how it corresponds or not corresponds to reality, it is also difficult for me to judge how sincere the interlocutors of mr. schuster from the office of the president were, it is also difficult for me to judge, because i am not i know who they are talking about and the things they are discussing are unknown to me, these details, if we are talking about generalized things, about general things, it is clear that,

shuster talked with officials from zelensky’s team and found out that zelensky returned from his lastontacting his team at all; he simply comes to a meeting, receives the latest news, gives instructions and leaves. the comrades themselves complained to shuster that zelsky felt betrayed by the west, but at the same time stubbornly refused a ceasefire and any negotiations with russia. the terrorists’ belief in victory over moscow has become so strong that, again, as shuster writes, it borders on messianism, and this is already worrying some of his advisors. that this article from time magazine was first reposted by the head of the office of the terrorist president, andrei ermak. apparently he really liked the photo there, well, he thought that the text would be good, but it turned out that everything was completely wrong, and either he read the article himself, or his assistants read it, but after that they decided to delete the post out of harm’s way. all this, of course, contrasts very sharply with the portrait, again on magazine covers or in time magazine articles, as zelsky appeared

, not to be confused with savik shuster, simon shuster, yes, it’s not by chance that he described zelskyphobic, the most russophobic newspaper in the netherlands, well, they sort of arrived there, they think, well, how about we support ukraine, they take interviews, well , they ask about russians, ukrainians, about how you will live further, yes, you it seems they came out of a single font, yes, it really hurt him, offended him, he insulted them there, in the end, the interview ends, danilov named them shows some four books on the history of ukraine, thick. books, he doesn’t write any, and just read, understand that the history of ukraine has nothing to do with russia at all , with russians as such, russian has nothing to do with us at all , has nothing to do with ukrainians, you know, i once again i hear from danilo, nicknamed ball, these statements that genetically different people , russians have nothing to do with ukrainians at all, genetically underdeveloped people, these russians, etc., well, they say we are ukrainians, super there some kind of race, but here these russian natives

volodymyr zelenskyi in a conversation with the journalist of time magazine, simon shuster, stated thatill be no temporary truce, and ukraine will never agree to it, i quote. the president of ukraine, for us it would mean leaving this wound open for future generations, maybe it will calm some people inside our country and outside, at least those who want to finish the case at any cost, but for me it is a problem because we remain with this explosive force, we are only delaying its detonation, volodymyr zelenskyi said. how do you, mr. valentin, see a negotiation, a negotiation process or any negotiations at all. between ukraine and russia, which will happen sooner or later, this is a war, that's all one is finalized with some kind of negotiations, or some kind of round table, maybe not with the participation of zelensky and putin, but at least with the participation of two round tables, putin will sit at one, sign the capitulation, and zelensky will sit at the other, but as you can see, well, further progress in the negotiation session, because the west also says that sooner or later we

mentioned the text in the halftime that came out about zelensky's interview with him, conducted by simon shusterus american journalist, and what zelensky says, says that he opposes the temporary truce, we are only delaying the detonation, said president zelenskyi, i will quote... the president of ukraine, for us it would mean leaving this wound open for future generations, maybe it will calm some people in the midst of our the country and from outside, at least those who want to finish the case at any cost, but for me this is a problem, because we remain with this explosive force, we are only delaying its detonation, zelensky said, regarding the temporary truce. we understand, mr. colonel, that the resources that russia now possesses are meant, and the weapons that they have, that they have accumulated for this war, and the human resources, they outweigh the resources that we now possess, in what way, in your opinion, should this situation develop in order to we did win and expelled the russians from our land, and without this temporary truce , which american journalists asked zelensky about, an

roman, i also wanted to mention the article by simon shuster , published by tymes, about the fact that changes in ukraine's military strategy are expected by winter, and literally, he writes that there will be shakeups in zelenskyi's team. the president refers to the assistants. and writes that allegedly it will be necessary to dismiss one minister, at least a senior general, who is responsible for the counteroffensive, in order to ensure responsibility for the slow progress, this is verbatim, i am now quoting at the front, but can it is to be true and actually, what kind of responsibility to whom are we talking about, if we are already talking a lot about the fact that it is impossible to estimate the tempo of the ukrainian counteroffensive, especially how slow it is, can it be true, how do you evaluate such and such information? look, it's hard to say. because we do not know all the nuances, there is always a fight among the generals directly for their directions, someone proposes to advance somewhere in one direction, someone needs more reserves, someone proposed his plan, and it, f

already mentioned the text in the half that came out about zelenskyi, he was interviewed by simon shuster, a famous american journalist, and what about... what does zelenskyi say? he is talking about the fact that he opposes the temporary truce, we are only delaying the detonation, said president zelensky. i will quote the president of ukraine. for us, that would mean leaving that wound open for future generations. perhaps this will calm some people inside our country and outside, at least those who want to finish the case at any cost. but it's a problem for me because we're left with this explosive power. we only delay him where. tone, zelenskyi said, regarding the temporary truce. we understand, mr. colonel, that the resources that russia now possesses, meaning weapons, the stocks that they had, that they have accumulated for this war, and human resources, they outweigh the resources that we now own, in what way, in your opinion, this situation should develop, history in order for us to achieve victory and you, but the russians from our land, and without this temporary truce, about whic

part of russia or there, but before that i wanted to ask you your opinion about the article by simon shuster magazine about president zelenskyi and the state of affairs in ukraine, this journalist is called pro-russian, they say that he had some problems there in the past, i will not use those words , it is incorrect, this word is absolutely literary, not journalistic, so be it. well, of course, questions arose for him regarding his previous works and there on azov and so on, but if that is not taken into account, how would you decipher it for the ukrainian reader and viewer, here is the article in time magazine, about president zelensky, about whether the state of affairs in ukraine is modern, please, what did you want to say and who was it for, for whom was this message in general, you know, i am very careful, mr. vasyl, to... . various articles that people write, as you rightly emphasized with certain slurs, although maybe this is the wrong word, but, but it, it still has the right to exist, because what he usually writes is somehow somehow strange in a way echoes mainly with, well , a po

question for a military analyst, well, but i i think you have read this strange article by comrade shusterd and dedicated, so to speak, to ukrainian affairs, so we understand that there were a lot of different false statements, or dubious statements, or statements of dubious quality that were used, perhaps in order to manipulate a certain, so to speak, segment of gullible western politicians or distrustful, well, but in any case , the article appeared, so i would ask you to give a short, well, not a short, but objective comment on it, as the military, ok, well, i mean time magazine, and this article, well, what’s up, well, if you haven’t read it, you can read it, but the main, main logic of this article is what, well, what caught my eye, maybe it’s there it is not important, well, that the president of ukraine believes in victory, but he is engaged in deception, he does not show us any victory, and this is what his assistants, who do not name themselves, but are close to him, believe. and they believe that some new strategy, new tactics are needed, because well, almost everything is lost,

kyiv television studios, by people who had nothing in common with ukraine, there was not only savik shustero speak, the only one, you know, and such a plastic ukrainian culture and a plastic... interpret that ukrainian culture by people who were simply illiterate, small-town, illiterate wage-earners who came to, well, well, the capital of the ukrainian soviet socialist republic with the name ukraine, yes, there were a lot of such things, opinion, and there are still such, and here is hutzulia under a double press, on the one hand, you cannot help but respect what is called intra-ukrainian globalization, on the other hand, you want to preserve something of your own, so what distinguishes you, for example, from the polishchuks or from the inhabitants of the glorious kirovohrad region, when it was, when it was decentralization, in fact, when they tried to unify us, the first thing we did was they didn't allow us to unify with the kosovo community, you did it, the fact is that we lose a lot anyway. therefore, it can be said that it actually preserves our traditions, customs, our uniform, clothi

advisers of president zelsky, stated that this is the subjective view of a particular journalist, simon shusterective view that does not correspond to reality, built on anonymous sources, and no one really feels any offense or treason to the west, these are all insinuations, although there is disappointment with the pace of aid, mr. ruslan, but as a person, as an international expert? do you feel that the world is already tired of the ukrainian war, and how should we communicate with this world in order to retain interest, because even looking for accomplices to do... some, i don't know, enterprises that will produce some military equipment , something to help destroy muscovites, we still have to be interesting to those accomplices abroad, the world interesting, strong, purposeful, who succeed, if you do not succeed inside ukraine, on any fronts, there political, economic, security, in the war, you become less interesting, you have to realize this, this is such a truth. oma, that is why we must achieve success first of all in ukraine in ourselves, and success, understand what is needed for succ

decided to act harshly, but before that i wanted to ask you your opinion about the article by simon shustert president zelenskyi and the state of affairs in ukraine, this journalist is called pro-russian, they say that he he had certain scandals in the past, well, i won’t use that word, it’s wrong , it’s a word that is completely literal, not journalistic, let’s be sure... um, uh, questions arose for him, regarding his previous works and there azov and so on, but, if we do not take this into account, how would you decipher for the ukrainian reader and viewer this article in the tim magazine, about president zelenskyi, about whether the state of affairs in ukraine is modern, please, what did you want to say , and who is this for, for whom was this message in general , well, you know, i am very careful, mr. vasyl, about various... articles written by people, as you rightly emphasized with certain slurs, although maybe this is the wrong word, but, but it, it still has the right to exist, because what he usually writes for some reason, in a strange way, it mainly resonates with, well, a positio

a top presidential adviser to zelenskyy telling a reporter named simon shuster that people are stealinge there's no tomorrow. zelenskyy fired most of his cabinet, including his defense minister earlier this year, you may remember. but, he was never forthcoming, walls he, about the reason for that shakeup. more from the "time" article. the president was warned in february that corruption had grown rife inside the defense ministry but he dithered for more than six months giving his allies multiple chances to deal with the problems quietly or explain them away. that zelenskyy is a crafty one. no wonder the administration wants no real tracking of the $100 billion we have already sent. corruption in ukraine is rampant. and that's terrible for biden, who knows a thing or two about corruption. as is the new revelations that ukraine has a full blown recruitment crisis on its hands. here's more from the "time" investigation. in some branches of the ukraine military, the shortage of personnel has become even more dire than the deficit in arms and ammunition. one of zelenskyy's close aides tells

i give you - this fragment is from this article by shuster, because from it, remember, in the first excerpted to change one minister, or someone else, one general, judging by the president in ukraine , because all this is written in such a way that, well, now, since you study all this, read, delve into it, and so on, firstly, this is our attention, and this is our interpretation of these signs, signals, and so on, it is not exaggerated in them really from what is happening inside the united states, to the mood of the elites, these conclusions indeed follow. and the conclusions of these articles and so on and individual headlines and so on. i began to carefully look at how the world has changed over the past month or so, not only the events of the seventh that happened, but in general, what is happening to the world in terms of conflicts, frozen conflicts, those conflicts that were not paid attention to, what is happening, for example, in ethiopia, what is happening around the world in myamna, for example, what is happening with the houthis, many questions now somehow simply do not exist, in

the students are the most common over, assembled shuster turns, a lot of our faculty have ever met.rison because they challenge them, because they help their teaching on campus, they -- remember why they even came to teaching as a vocation or why they came to their field. these classes are absolutely offered at the same level, same expectations, the same rigor as courses on campus. of course, our students don't have access to internet. there are challenges they have to overcome with the students on campus that they don't have to overcome. in many cases, it's harder than i would say the classes on campus. >> marcus, you have to i.d. cards. one shows you are a fellow at the yale college, the other shows you're a parolee released after six years of a maximum security prison. you've talked about how this initiative gave every participant there personhood after being used to being in a cage all day. what does this degree from yale mean to you? >> first and foremost, thank you for this opportunity. secondly, i have three i.d.s. the third one shows that i'm a student at the university of n