i also know the sibleys who own 37 08 broderick street [speaker not understood] would eliminate sun and air and cause significant privacy issue. i truly do not believe the planning department of san francisco wants to set a precedent for future projects and thus destroy this architectural design intended when the marina was built in the 1930s. this has been quite an education these past few months since we were forced to follow our discretionary review with the sibleys. [speaker not understood], the resounding theme and comments were consistent. isn't it very difficult if not impossible to get i variance in the city? ~ according to code doesn't 25% of the lot rear and/or side yard need to be nonbuildable? isn't that one of the largest homes on the block already? why would a neighbor want to block your sunlight coming into your home? i don't even remember receiving a notice regarding this project. >> sir, your time -- >>> in closing we hope you consider all of these points made by our neighbors. >> sir, your time is up. >>> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >>> good afternoon. i'm pame

. >>> my name is ford sibley, senior. you already spoke to my son, floyd, jr. and i'm opposed to the project. everything pretty much has been talked about. there is kind of a main issue here. this is one of largest -- the the project is one of largest houses in area already. already. and i can feel the pain they want to president hu an elevator in. but they already have the largest house. the elevator -- a commercial residence elevator only needs to be 12 square feet. that can easily take up a house that's already bigger than almost twice the the size of our house next door at 37 08. so, it was really -- i don't think -- i know they said we need an elevator that's why we want to go the side yard. they don't need to do that. they have plenty of room. it's the largest garage in the neighborhood. it's the largest house in the neighborhood. it's huge. they don't need to be any bigger. also, just really quick, just show this here. on the original plans they show a house, the addition over here. to be three stories. it's only two stories. so, i can show you a picture

>> sibley put the labor- intensive sector and industries, i do not think they would develop their. it would have to have a big supply of land for that industry . plus some educated labor. >> skilled labor. >> yes. with that in mind, the different economic pattern of development which is different from the coastal side of china, that would happen in the future. >> explain that to us. how with the development of the west in the next five to 10 years be different? i have been given by a cue that we can go live to xian. the economic form has just begun in xian. > -- forum has just begun in xian. >> your excellency --[inaudible] good morning. the open session for the economic forum now begins. first of all, i want to invite the secretary of the committee to deliver a speech. [applause] >> your excellency vice for mayor -- premier and your excellency president karzai, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, today we are gathered in xian, a big city with a long history for the opening session of the 2013 economic forum. on behalf of the committee and government i would like to extend

rub -- robert wright said obama is sibley asking congress to save his that ability after the red linerew. this one says i am a moroccan living in the u.s. eared extremists in syria and the middle east will be a possible that and a possible fix, a waste of money and effort. more conversation on facebook. let us know how you want your congressional representatives to vote on syria. facebook.com/cspan. frommorning we heard viewers during washington journal. we talked to a journalist who talked about the situation in syria. we want to welcome the editor and chief executive lmonitor.com. he also served for chuck hagel. foreign relations committee approved a resolution to strike syria. what do you make of the resolution? >> it is an interesting debate. what you saw is that the foreign relations committee narrowed the scope of the authorization for the use of force. it now says limited to the use of force to degrade syria's chemical weapons capability. it reflected a mood that i think your callers see about the concern that this operation, this military force being notidered in syria, does e