we both know sidney powell.idney powell is extremely smart, well-respected, and with a defensive case on mueller's pit bull andrew weissmann. here's the point. if she, and a smiling, is claiming that they were asking general flynn till i come back in the same situation where prosecutors can offer something of great value -- freedom -- if you just say what we want and why. in the paul manafort case. >> it's the equivalent of testi-lying. when a prosecutor does not, it is a warning perjury. if you when i did that, would be charged. president dominic prosecutors think they can do it every day of the week. sidney powell is going to presented the judge what happened to michael flynn. in particular, he is charged with lying, and yet here is what the fbi report says. strzok and the interviewer both had the impression that flynn was not lying. he did not give any indication -- >> sean: how ironic way to speak it with the only two people who interviewed flynn said he was not lying in their judgment, then why did mueller

why did he hire the guy, oh, yeah, sidney powell exposed the ever so overzealous prosecutor, mueller's pit bull andrew weissmann to lead the investigation. after all, he was at the clinton election night party that never happened, likely sobbing with everyone else there. he has an atrocious track record of withholding exculpatory evidence, numerous cases overturned, convictions overturned because of exculpatory evidence withheld, and also, why did mueller have time to investigate medallions, loan applications, tax fraud, but not fisa abuse and not a paid for a russian dossier? if he cared about russian interference, and in the 2016 elections, why did he then not have any probe into hillary clinton's and dirty dossiers? the one with russian lies, the one that was disseminated to the american people to influence the election. now, where was the deep dive into the ex-foreign spy, christopher steele? what about fusion gts? their connections to unsavory characters around the world and their founder, glenn simpson. when did mueller determined that there was no trump-russia collusion? why did

joining us tonight, sidney powell former federal prosecutor, author attorney for former national security advisor. great to have you here. >> my pleasure. lou: that was an extremely performance by both the radical dems who had had a mock rehearsal and away in which they immerse themselves, the party, the nation and how they represent. it was awful. >> it was appalling from every perspective on every level. it was in a basement for mr. miller personally who allowed his credibility and integrity to be put behind us. lou: he loved the investigation. >> he was guilty of fraud. unfortunately he has to take responsibility for the fraud that he perpetrated with the witchhunt. we now know we know there was no collusion and no conspiracy with the russians and of the democratic party to steal the 2018th midterm election. there is no other way to look at it than that. >> i think he had to know it before he started the investigation -- because his lead lieutenant was running that channel on fabricating the field dossier into the hands of the fbi. lou: re-taken off when he said he had no contacts or g

sidney powell who is now general flynn's attorney wrote a book, called license to lie, innate, wiseman is known for withholding as a prosecutor exculpatory evidence, which means that he cares more about the wins and losses, not about the truth. not about justice and is willing to basically cheat to win a case. that is not a good thing to have in a prosecutor. that is dangerous for anybody. in fact two of the high-profile convictions, they were overturned because of prosecutorial misconduct. one case, he sent four merrill executives to prison for a year before that verdict was overturned by the fifth circuit. another case, wow, it is not easy to do. that was overturned 9-0b tween the u.s. supreme court, not before thousands of employees at andersen accounting lost their jobs. they are good paying jobs. and let's not forget andrew weissmann, and extreme political bias. a big-time democratic donor, attending hillary clinton's election party, the celebration than ever happened. still mueller still chose wiseman to choose the staffing. and then he subsequently hired a team chock-full of big

did you ever read licensed alive by sidney powell that talks about wiseman's god awful horrific track of withholding exculpatory evidence? were you aware of that? when were you aware of that? were you aware that wiseman was a devout democrat and that he was at her clinton's victory party? who did the vetting and hiring of the rest of your staff? when did you become aware that your team was only made up of big-time democratic owners and zero republicans? were you aware that jeannie ray who works for you, worked on the hillary clinton foundation as her lawyer? why was she on your team? do not see a conflict of interest? why did you fire, or did you fire struck and page because we know andrew mccabe says he didn't. it's been reported you didn't save struck and pages of cell phones after you became aware that they had a nancy trump by us. why? why did you send those phones back to its factory that they are made into get cleaned? isn't that basic law enforcement 101, save the records? do you regret all hiring only democrats? at the very least, do you realize the appearance of political vio

clinton super fan, the guy at the victory party, andrew weissmann, the people, this is the guy that sidney powell wrote about in license to live. the most atrocious prosecutorial track record i have ever heard of, likely running the show from day one, which actually, makes the conclusion even that much more remarkable here yesterday, the president tweeted that truth is a force of nature. he was right. the last hoax has been exposed reaction, even "the new york times" stumbled on some truth. think about this. when they reported that the dossier was probably russian disinformation from the get-go, what were they really saying there? that means, without saying it, they inadvertently were saying that if the russians were involved from the beginning, and they knew about deal reading this to hillary, they say, that it was likely russian disinformation from the gecko, that means that the russians were not helping hillary clinton in the 2016 election. that would mean they were trying to screw over donald trump and get hillary elected. now, an investigation into the origins of this witch hunt is well unde

clinton super fan, the guy at the victory party, andrew weissmann, the pitbull, this is the guy that sidney powell wrote about in "license to lie.". the most atrocious prosecutorial track record i have ever heard of in my life, likely running the show from day one. it actually makes that conclusion even that much more remarkable. yesterday the president tweetede that truth is a force of nature. he was right.t the left hoax has been exposed. actually "the new york times" stumbled on some truth -- think about this. when they reported that the dossier was probably russian disinformation from the p get-g, what were they releasing there? that means, without seeing it come s with a kind of inadvertently were saying, if the russians were involved in te beginning, and they knew about steele feeding this to hillary, as they said it was likely russian disinformation from theec get-go, that means tt the russians were not helping hillary clinton and a 201601 election. that would mean6 they were tryg to screw over donald trump and get hillary elected. an investigation into the or is origins into this witch hun

mayor, we can read the grade book by sidney powell, "license july -- >> we kind of memorized it. >> sean: tens thousands of americans lost their job, four people to jail, he was in charge of everything. here's my point. he's the biggest, most corrupt prosecutor he could have with the most abusively biased, one-sided democratic team, and he still had no goods! and he convinced mueller not to look at the dirty dossier! >> and he knew, because he was very close to strzok -- he was involved in this in 2016, as john solomon has uncovered. so he had a real, vested interest in this, way beyond what is healthy for a prosecutor. now bob mueller has some kind of a weird attachment to him, which i can't quite figure out because it q mueller, he's never been an unethical prosecutor. this guy is a textbook on ethical prosecutor, and we are going to add the chapters to that. i mean, offering a ukrainian oligarch freedom if he says what you want to say? >> sean: two weeks! >> the ukrainian oligarch has more honor thann you do and say, i won't lie to you. so does paul manafort, so does jerome corsi come