but still, i understand, and sienkiewicz, by the way, is also one of the first nobel laureates, so heriter and no one in russia speaks japanese, you know, here in russia the empire has such laureates well, but they by the way, this is closer to me in the field of philosophy they very often, for example, like to talk about kant , who for some time belonged to the russian empire, so that is, they have his graves and kants are nicer than sienkovych sienkovych is not included in the russian pantheon simply at all well, of course yes, but otherwise, this is an imperial attempt to involve prominent people somehow, maybe the poles don’t fit in here a bit. for a long time, russian socrates was accepted as a russian socrates, and it was usual in the 19th century, absolutely yes, but already at the beginning of the war, as we know, rockets flew into the skovoroda museum, and this is as if such a conclusion and how skovoroda himself perceived himself. what do you think he well, without perceiving the philosopher as ukrainian, someone probably did not perceive the name ukrainian at all, as we und