simon henderson wrote in "the wall street journal," he said that the chaos and violence in yemen is such that it would be an improvement to call it a civil war. it is hard to know who is friend and foe. even our former ambassador to syria has said in syria, it's almost impossible to know friend from foe. but people have written repeatedly that saudi weapons in syria have gone to the wrong people. it's not like whoops, saudi arabia is sometimes wrong and they're not that bad. they have a horrific human rights record. there are people who believe them to be complicit in 9/11. this body voted unanimously to let the 9/11 victims sue them, and now this body wants to give them weapons. does no one sense the irony? so as we move forward on this vote, everyone should understand that this is a proxy vote for whether we should be at war in the middle east because neither side, the leadership on neither side will allow a vote on whether or not we should authorize force. neither side will let the constitutional debate occur on whether or not we should be at war. i see my colleague from connecticut.