you and i have already analyzed some theses once simon schuster before the release of his book abouty. and i can tell you that in this case, as you remember, we turned out to be right, because... the words were just a goal to promote my book , nothing more, nothing less. well, yes, we remember, there are stories about how it all happened in the presidential bunker, he was not there in the bunker later, well, that is , there were a lot of such components in this book, well, nevertheless, this the book, by the way, is quite active, it is read and sold all over the world and not only in united states of america. is another statement.

but this story with kamala harris has some interesting details in the magazine . time, because simon schuster correspondent of this american edition, wrote about the cool relations between candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, kamala harris, and president zelensky, after their meeting on the sidelines of the munich security conference in february 22, a few days before russia's invasion of ukraine, and then the vice president rejected the offer of the president of ukraine. the idea of ​​pre-emptive sanctions against moscow, to quote what simon schuster wrote: zelensky called on the united states of america to introduce pre-emptive sanctions against russia, arguing that it would force putin to reconsider his decision to invade. if the attack is actually inevitable, zelensky argued, then the united states of america should send ukraine the weapons, including air defense systems, fighter jets and heavy artillery, needed to prevent a russian takeover. leaders of the country, well, there are also details of how kamala garis told zelensky what you have to say about the fact t

sergey, well, answering this... question, first of all it should be noted that this is written by simon schustere for himself is so great that he sometimes subordinates what he writes to only one purpose, so that his popularity is related to him grew, and he very often does not take care of how these problems and these things correspond to the realities that happened, as for the conversation about... which if it is a conversation, then it really was, and this conversation, fortunately for us, unfortunately for shuster, did not have the content that he described, who told him this conversation, whether it was zelenskyi himself, or the president of ukraine or gomala garis, well told, only he can say this, but it was really about a high probability of an attack, but aris, for example, did not...

you and i have already analyzed some theses once simon schuster before the release of his book about mr. zelenskyi, and i can tell you that in this case, as you remember, we were right, because the words were only used to advertise. your book, no more, no less. well, yes, we remember the stories about how it all happened in the presidential bunker, he was not there in the bunker later, well, that is, there were a lot of such components in this book, but nevertheless, this book , by the way, is quite active, read and sold all over the world, and no only in the united states of america, another statement made by another. candidate for the presidency of the united states of america, donald trump. he once again promised to bring kyiv and moscow to the negotiating table, he said this during a conversation with streamer edin. let's hear what trump said. if i win the elections, first of all i will contact putin, i will contact zelenskyi, i know them both very well, and i will get them to start peace talks. in short, mr. roman, is this just trump's pre-election bluff and rhetoric, does he re

helping us is simon & schuster for the new york independent that was banned by vladimir putin, showmanade a leader of volodymyr zelenskyy. there is no mystery, every time i speak to an author of a banned book, at a minimum, once a week, and there is never any mystery as to what why the book was banned, yours less so. they specifically-- there wasn't anything about this that anybody didn't know. they took this book away, when it came into russia, because they don't want people to read the story you are telling. >> they did put out a statement explaining why they banded and to me it was almost comical. they said the book poses a threat to russian national security", the morality of its citizens. i don't know how self-conscious you have to be how week how little you have to believe in your own -- >> sorry, i'm just fixing-- there we go. >> in your own country's national security to think this book can pose a threat to it. >> what you are in that world where you think books pose threats. but this does take us to a bigger issue and that is the myth of the special military operation in ukrai

difficult relationship with kamalo garis, if you believe the publication in time magazine and simon schuster security conference in 2022 , before the large-scale invasion, zelensky and garis had such a tense relationship. as simon writes, a conversation about how ukraine should respond to threats of an attack by the russian federation. in your opinion, to what extent are these personal, personal misunderstandings that zelensky once had with trump and garis can influence the relations between ukraine and the united states of america. well, after biden , none of the politicians. will not be a good grandfather or a good grandmother for zelensky, this is an obvious fact, the fact is that trump in general is so sick of the mention of zelensky, he defeats himself at the same time, but he perfectly understands that zelensky is the one, well that story with the impeachment, and he, well , trump definitely has no trust in zelenskyi and his entourage, i want to remind you that at one time, giuliani, the former mayor of new york and trump's lawyer, came to kyiv and organized. the criminal case against

if you believe publications in time magazine zelensky also has a difficult relationship with simon schustere at the munich security conference of the 22nd year. before the large-scale invasion , zelenskyi and garis had, as simon writes, a tense conversation about whether ukraine to respond to threats of an attack by the russian federation. to what extent, in your opinion , are these personal, personal misunderstandings that zelenskyy once had with trump and garis can affect relations between ukraine and... the states of america, well, after biden, none of the politicians will be a good grandfather or a good grandmother for zelenskyi . this fact is obvious. the fact is that trump , in general, cringes at the mention of zelensky. he defeats himself at the same time, but he perfectly understands that zelensky is the one, well, that story from impeachment and... he, well , trump definitely has no trust in zelenskyi and his entourage, i want to remind you that at one time, giuliani, once... the mayor of new york and trump's lawyer came to kyiv and organized this criminal case against -e biden an

this week's publication came out in the half, where simon schuster talks about the eve of the great war, the munich conference of 2022, and not easy dialogues or difficult arguments that were between president zelensky and the vice president of the united states kamala garis, how is it? you assess, as a person who knows very well how the american political machine works, how these mutual misunderstandings existed between zelenskyi, trump, zelenskyi and garis, how this affects bilateral relations later two countries? i am very concerned that we are still in a different paradigm of evaluating elections, and i have tried it on more than one. i cannot change the transmission yet, the fact is that it is not so important for ukraine who will win in this situation, it is more important for ukraine what will happen in terms of the supply of weapons and financial assistance from the united states, and by the end of the year, and in the next, in this sense, there will be turbulence in the states, and you know that we have no instrument, we have no conversation, no funding projects we... last year

against hunter biden in the case of burism, this week the publication appeared in the half where simon schusters about the eve of the great war, that is, the munich conference in 2022 , and not difficult dialogues or difficult disputes between president zelenskyi and vice president of the united states kamala gary. how do you assess, as a person who knows very well how the american political machine works, how these mutual misunderstandings between zelenskyi, trump, zelenskyi and garis affect the bilateral relations of the two countries? i am very worried that we are still in a different paradigm of election evaluation, and... i am trying to change it on every show, and so far i can't, the fact is that for ukraine it is not so important who will win in this situation, it is more important for ukraine, what will happen in terms of the supply of weapons, financial assistance from the united states, and by the end of the year, and in the next, in this sense, there will be turbulence in the states, and you know that we have there is no tool, we do not have a difference. funding projects, we all tal

question was given by rostyslav shurma, who fixes cufflinks, to new york times correspondent simon schuster they go around showing that they are military, so they are, so this is such an adviser... from the economy, our dear viewers, to whose brother you and i sent money to the occupied territories through the budget, because they allegedly engaged in solar energy in the occupied territories, so shuster him i ask in the second interview, first of all, he received orders, because zelensky means our hero, and tatara is our everything, so the second asks, well, you have corruption here , corruption is such, why does it happen, so shuster describes, he just said the correcting starch budget, otherwise everything will fall apart. that's why it's going to rain, that's why zelenskyy is holding on, five salutes minjarovshchyna, remember, simiboyarshchyna, this is the system on which they will be, it does not function, but in conditions of war, when the law on the legal regime of martial law does not allow us either through elections or directly through participation in mass demonstrations and event

the first thing i must say is that everything simon schuster writes, he is more concerned about his reputationhat he is writing about. therefore, when reading schuster, one must be very careful from the point of view of evaluating people, from the point of view of perspective. and, we can see very well, even in ukrainian to fly as what happened yesterday and today, as they say in odessa, these are two big differences, but what will happen tomorrow is completely different, the first thing to note when analyzing such a situation is to proceed from the point of view and characteristics of the persons kamala harris, from the point of view of experts, is one of the toughest politicians in american history, even if compared. by the most rigid republicans, so it is necessary to understand that she is not only called a tiger of american politics, but some also call her a shark. therefore, expect a secondary one from her the role she played as the vice president, it is obvious that the approaches that even the democrats and even joe biden had in the event of her election as president will be radically

new, new deal the hidden story of change in the obama area is currently working on a book for simon & schuster about food, land and climate change. let's give him a warm welcome. [applause] >> thank you. thank you so much. thanks for having us a books and books, thank you mitch kaplan who is the literary god of miami we are so grateful for this place. and thank you, adam for writing this fantastic book. thank you. it is really brilliant. it is gripping, it is a nauseating, is it time is really tough to read because you know what is coming. until you wrote a book about chernobyl it's a really cheery happy story. what made you want to dive into the challenger? >> allows publicizing the book and was often asked if i remember it where it was when i heard the news it happened. i always have to admit that i didn't. ixa didn't rub her exactly wheri was by her about the challenger exactly three months before. when it started think about what i'dd like to write about next he was sorting the front of my mind. i also began to realize they have two things in common. nature of the build up to the accidents

simon schuster. i was never asked about the world of latino. whenever i brought it up at an editorial meeting, i was told the latinos read, so let's don't bring me your ideas about latinos. bring me your ideas about everything. and i got to the washington post, and they were curious. they were curious because there weren't that many. i was one of the very few latinos on staff at the post. and i offered to be sent out, even though my job was books to be sent out to talk to and talk to them in spanish and bring to the paper stories about them, because that was growing. and in washington in the area and the post being a good journalistic institute, i was curious about them. so i began at that. i began to write books, every aspect of latino, starting with myself. my first book was a memoir because i was suddenly made aware of that little girl, ten years old, who arrived in country. where did that little girl go? because had been harassing her ever since. so i wrote american chica, to remind myself of who that was. that was 24 years ago. i presented

he's currently working a book for simon & schuster about food, landt' and climate change let's give him a warm welcome. [applause] sucks thank you. thank you so much. and thanks for having us books and books. thank you mitch kaplan who is the literary god of miami. we are so grateful for this place. and thank you adam for writing this fantastic book thank you. >> it is really brilliant it's gripping at the nauseating at times really tough to read because you know what is coming. and so you wrote a book about chernobyl a cheery happy story. what made you want to dive into the challenger? >> a partly it goes back to when i was publicizing the chernobyl book i was often asked if i remember where i was when i heard the news that happened. i always admit i didn't. i did member exactly where i was when heard about the c challengr which happened almost exactly three months before. when he started to think about what i would like to write about next it was art in the front of my mind. i also begin to realize and had a lot of things in common the nature of the build up to the accident. there it

my additive at simon & schuster, really strikes me as a rulebreaker and rule breakers seem to be exactly right. barbara walters broke every rule, she didn't just break rules, she ignored them, she pretended she couldn't see them. the idea that a woman couldn't do serious interviews, she just ignored it and went ahead, the idea that a woman couldn't be paid as much as a man, she blue that idea out, the idea later in life that woman couldn't age on tv, she was 67 when she embarked on her last big adventure, the abc talk show. will make her willmaker seem to me to be exactly right under rulemaker as well. what intrigued me, on the cover of the book is a picture of barbara walters when she had just joined abc news, where i had already been for a war or two. what is happening at that moment the pictures taken? this picture is from 1976, e year she reached the pinnacle she had sought for so long, to be named coanchor of an evening network newscast, evening news and it had been a terrible experience, she was going into what we today would call a hostile workplace. her coanchor initially threate

he's working on a book for simon & schuster about food, land and climate change. let's give them a warm welcome. [applause] >> thank you so much. thanks for having us come books & books. thanks mitch who is literally god of miami. were all so grateful for this place, and thank you, adam, for writing this just fantastic book. it's really brilliant. it's gripping, it's nauseating, it's at times really tough to read because you know what's coming. and so he wrote a book about chernobyl. another happy story. what made you want to dive into the challenger? >> partly because backup to when i was publicizing the chernobyl book and is often asked of her memory was when he heard the news when it happened. i have to admit i didn't. but i did member exact right was one heard about challenger el chapo almost exactly three months before. when i started to think about what i'd like to write about next come it was ordered in a front of my mind. i also began to realize the accidents had quite a bit in common. as the buildup for the accident, the fact it was a sort of individual e

joining us is simon & schuster. author of that book that i was telling you about.leader of zelenskyy. great to see you. there is no mystery. every time i speak to the author of a band book, the minimum of once a week, there is no mystery as to why it was banned. there was not anything about this that anybody did not know. they took this book away when it came into russia because they do not want people to read the story you are telling. >> they put out a statement explaining. it was almost comical. it was a threat to national security and the morality of its citizens. i don't know how self-conscious and weak you have to be -- >> sorry, we were fixing your mic. there we go. once you are in the world where you think that books pose a threat. it takes us to the issue of the myth of the special military operation in ukraine. if left to read about it, whether your book or anything else, a lot of russians use vpn so they get news from another piece of the world. they know a piece of their land is occupied. they know that dead bodies are coming back. they know what is goi

but it was my it was my editor at simon and schuster, priscilla peyton, who said she really me as a rule breaker. and rule breaker seemed to be exactly right because barbara walters broke every rule around. and, you know, she didn't just break rules. she ignored them. she pretended she couldn't see them. so the idea that a a woman couldn't do serious interviews, she just ignored it and went ahead and scheduled serious interviews. the idea that a woman can be paid as much as a man. well, she certainly blew that idea up. the idea later in life that a woman could age on tv, you know, she was 67 when she embarked on her last big adventure, the view of you, the abc talk show. so rule breakers seemed to me to be exactly right. and a rule maker as well who can treat me on cover of the book is a picture of barbara walters when s had just joined abc news where i had already been for a for a year or two. what is happening at that moment? that that picture is taken. this picture is from 1976. that was the year she got she reached the pinnacle that she had sought for so long to be named co-anchor of

he's working on a book for simon and schuster about food and climate change. let's him a warm welcome. thank you. thank you so much. and thanks. thanks for having us. books and books. thank you. mitch kaplan, who is the literary god of miami. we're also so grateful for this place. and thank you for writing this just fantastic book. thank you. really brilliant. it's gripping. it's nauseating. it's it's at times really tough to read. you know, what's coming right. and so you wrote a book about, chernobyl. there. really cheery, happy story. what made you want to dive into the challenger? well, partly it goes back to when i was publicizing the chernobyl book and i was often asked if i remembered where i was when i heard the news that it happened, and i always had to admit that i didn't, but that i did remember exactly where i was when i heard about challenger which happened almost exactly months before. so when i started to think about what i'd like to write about next, it was already at the front. my mind. and i also began to realize that the two accidents had qu

he's working on a book for simon and schuster about food and climate change. let's him a warm welcome. thank you. thank you so much. and thanks. thanks for having us. books and books. thank you. mitch kaplan, who is the literary god of miami. we're also so grateful for this place. and thank you for writing this just fantastic book. thank you. really brilliant. it's gripping. it's nauseating. it's it's at times really tough to read. you know, what's coming right. and so you wrote a book about, chernobyl. there. really cheery, happy story. what made you want to dive into the challenger? well, partly it goes back to when i was publicizing the chernobyl book and i was often asked if i remembered where i was when i heard the news that it happened, and i always had to admit that i didn't, but that i did remember exactly where i was when i heard about challenger which happened almost exactly months before. so when i started to think about what i'd like to write about next, it was already at the front. my mind. and i also began to realize that the two accidents had qu

simon schuster. i was never asked about the world of latino.whenever i brought it up at an editorial meeting, i was told the latinos read, so let's don't bring me your ideas about latinos. bring me your ideas about everything. and i got to the washington post, and they were curious. they were curious because there weren't that many. i was one of the very few latinos on staff at the post. and i offered to be sent out, even though my job was books to be sent out to talk to and talk to them in spanish and bring to the paper stories about them, because that was growing. and in washington in the area and the post being a good journalistic institute, i was curious about them. so i began at that. i began to write books, every aspect of latino, starting with myself. my first book was a memoir because i was suddenly made aware of that little girl, ten years old, who arrived in country. where did that little girl go? because had been harassing her ever since. so i wrote american chica, to remind myself of who that was. that was 24 years ago. i presented