provide a framework for ending the threat of destruction inspections very clear we're assigning sinar states out of the green to take good faith efforts to build a limited nuclear weapons and i'm not ok with that and now of course we focus on regulations by which those who are like policemen on the world scene i'm talking of the nuclear powers they are violating this very law which they want other countries to observe now where if a policeman but it's the law you cannot expect the rest of the world to come play with a lot of the only thing that would work would be one that is perceived to be nondiscriminatory and fair and equally applied to all countries whose one approach that has followed these bears is you know dividing the world between friends courtroom called good countries and court and court bad or raw countries or evil doers that approach doesn't work it doesn't pay too much to remember that in the one nine hundred eighty s. garble sand in iraq was a friend of the west to. the criminally stolen our intelligence agencies like the invasion of iraq. nuclear proliferation and terror. fo

provide a framework for ending the threat of destructions missions pretty clear we're assigning sinar states really agree to take good fleets efforts to move a limb and a nuclear weapons i'm not of that and of course we focus on run aleutians by others those who are like policemen on the world scene and talking of the nuclear powers they are violating this very law which they want other countries to observe how you have what if a policeman violates the law you cannot expect the rest of the world to can play with a lot of the only thing that would work would be one that is perceived to be nondiscriminatory and fair and equally applied to all countries. that has followed these days is you know dividing the world between friends court and court good countries and court and court bad or rogue countries or evil to do with that approach doesn't work it doesn't pay too much to remember that in the one nine hundred eighty s. the double sand in iraq was a friend of the west. or stalin on an intelligence agency and it's not the invasion of interact with. nuclear proliferation and terror . for good rea

does provide a framework for the threat of destruction inspections for the cold war assigning sinar states a bit greedy think good phrase if it's terminal a limited nuclear weapons and i'm not moved up to that and now of course we focus on regulations by which those who are like policemen on the word scene and talk of the nuclear powers they are violating this very law which they want other countries to observe now where if a policeman but it's the law you cannot expect the rest of the world to come play be a lot of the only system that would work would be one better is perceived to be nondiscriminatory and fair and equally applied to all countries one approach that is followed these days is you know dividing the world between friends called them court good countries and court and court bad or rogue countries or evil to do with that approach doesn't work it doesn't pay too much to remember that in the one nine hundred eighty three dabbles then in iraq was a friend of the west. pretty much the right intelligence agency and the invasion of iraq would spur nuclear proliferation and her. for g