jennie, you said you wanted sir cliff to win and it is a big win for sir cliff richard?completely the right decision. unfortunately, the bbc prioritised its reputation, which had taken a huge battering following thejimmy savile scandal and they prior to rise their own reputation over an innocent man's reputation. the damages have been said that £210,000. how do you quantify the impact on someone in financial terms? you can't, unless you showed they have lost a contract as a result of it, you can't quantify. the issue with damages for privity, you can never undo the harm. we will never not see the images of the police storming into sir cliff's house. thejudge has said the damages at the highest level to send a clear message this was completely wrong. so that is the most that could have been awarded, is it? wrong. so that is the most that could have been awarded, is mm is the upper level. christopher, we we re is the upper level. christopher, we were hearing from helena that we will hear the detail as to how sir cliff richard want it, is it because the bbc named him or is

and having made that balance, he decided to come down in favour of sir cliff richard.f's right to privacy outweighed the bbc‘s right to freedom of expression. there may be cases in the future where the balance would come the other way, so it's not going to be a total ban on naming people who are the subject of inquiries, but i think journalists are going to think twice before they do it in future. i think there is a very clear red line here. they should not name anybody until the police have reason to prosecute. i guess the bbc will probably argue that, in the interests of other witnesses coming forward, the very fact that a named person is in the public eye will bolster the case, if you like, for the prosecution. however, once you have made allegations of that nature against somebody, you cannot unmake them. you know, whilst the ruling in court has completely exonerated sir cliff, the story remains. and nothing, no apology, will actually take that harm away. joshua, the bbc‘s push for an exclusive on this, you know, they entered that coverage for an award. they led on

sir cliff, how are you feeling about the judgment?s going to take a little while for me to get over the whole emotional factor. so, i hope you will forgive me. in tears, he had told the court his life was forever tainted, now he was vindicated. sir cliff is of course very pleased with the court's judgment today. he never expected after 60 years in the public eye that his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way and that he would need to fight such a battle. the singer was awarded £210,000 but is likely to get more. the bbc is also facing millions in legal costs. this is a massivejudgment for sir cliff richard and pretty devastating for the bbc. it raises questions for the entire media about how they cover police investigations. his friends saw the physical and mental toll over the last four years. he was determined to fight this case, and in a way, even if he hadn't won the case, i think he has won it as far as the public is concerned. because personally, i've never heard so many people saying, i hope he wins this case an

sir cliff, how are you feeling about the judgment? a little while for me to get over the whole emotional factor. and so i hope you will forgive me. in tears, he had told the court his life was forever tainted, now he was vindicated. sir cliff is of course very pleased with the court's judgment today. he never expected after 60 years in the public eye that his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way and that he would need to fight such a battle. the singer was awarded £210,000 but is likely to get more. the bbc is also facing millions in legal costs. this is a massivejudgment for sir cliff richard and pretty devastating for the bbc. it raises questions for the entire media about how they cover police investigations. his friends saw the physical and mental toll over the last four years. he was determined to fight this case and, in a way, even if he hadn't won the case, i think he's won it as far as the public is concerned. because personally, i've never heard so many people saying, "i hope he wins this case" and it was ter

sir cliff, how are you feeling about thejudgement?oing to take a little while for me to get over the whole emotional factor. and so i hope you will forgive me. in tears, he had told the court his life was forever tainted. now, he was vindicated. sir cliff is of course very pleased with the court's judgement today. he never expected, after 60 years in the public eye, that his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way, and that he would need to fight such a battle. the singer was awarded £210,000, but is likely to get more. the bbc is also facing millions in legal costs. this is a massivejudgement for sir cliff richard, and pretty devastating for the bbc. and it raises questions for the entire media about how they cover police investigations. his friends saw the physical and mental toll over the last four years. he was determined to fight this case, and in a way, even if he hadn't won the case, i think he's won it as far as the public is concerned. because personally, i've never heard so many people saying, i hope he wins th

he has 110w awarded to sir cliff richard.gal teams have left court, and also the senior bbc news managers have left now, going to look over thatjudgment, around 200 pages or so. let's speak to clive coleman, our legal affairs correspondent. we have had that statement from the bbc, the line and there, this impact notjust the bbc that every media organisation. how significant is this? it is very significant. the phrase game changer is often used, but what the judge has done today is found that, not the helicopter pictures, not what sir cliff had pleaded with the excessive nature of the coverage, but simply naming sir cliff as a suspect in that police investigation was a breach of his privacy. what that means is, going forward, people who are suspects in police investigations are entitled to a reasonably expect that that matters is kept private. and it is not private holed covered by the media. if you look at the statement from the bbc, that is why they are broadening the south and saying that this is in effect a dark day for ne

sir cliff was neither arrested nor charged.d the entertainer‘s privacy rights in a ‘5erious and sensationalist way‘. the bbc has said it is considering an appeal. our correspondent daniela relph has the latest. for sir cliff richard, it was an overwhelming legal victory. he cried in court as the judgment was read and showed his emotion as he left. i can't really answer too many questions at the moment. it's going to take a little while for me to get over the whole emotional factor. and so i hope you'll forgive me. i'll talk to some other time, thank you very much. in august 2014, the bbc reported on a police search of sir cliff richard's home in berkshire. it was part of a south yorkshire police investigation into an historical allegation of sexual abuse made by a boy under the age of 16. sir cliff richard was never arrested or charged. he argued the coverage was intrusive and an invasion of his privacy. today thejudge agreed. he never expected after 60 years in the public eye that his privacy and reputation would be tarnished

sir cliff always denied the allegations, and wasn't arrested or charged.oday's ruling as ‘wonderful news'. the bbc says it's very sorry for the distress caused to sir cliff, but is considering an appeal. the executive director of the society of editors ian murrayjoins me now from our studio in liverpool. thank you very much indeed for talking to us. what do you make of thejudgment? talking to us. what do you make of the judgment? as someone who was editing a newspaper and in the newsroom at the time and watched the drama unfolds, and it was drama, it was like watching a drama show, the helicopters whizzing around the home of sir cliff, then we discovered he was not there, i must admit, i thought it was an important story that he was being investigated, but this is over the top, sensational. i was not surprised when that element was not surprised when that element was underscored in court today. the surprise and the concern from the society of editors and others in the society of editors and others in the media is that the judge went further than that and s

that, "the bbc went in for an invasion of sir cliff's privacy rights, in a big way."hat the bbc‘s conduct was unlawful and a very serious invasion of privacy rights. the case clearly confirmed that individuals, including high profile ones, have a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to police investigations. what transpired in august 2014 resulted from decisions taken by only a small number of people at the bbc, however it was as a direct result of those decisions that impact on sir cliff over the last four years was so profound. he never expected after 60 years in the public eye that his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way, and that he would need to fight such a battle. although he felt it necessary to pursue this case, and the sum awarded in damages is one of the highest ever in this area of law, sir cliff's motivation was not for personal gain as he knew all along he would be substantially out of pocket no matter what. his aim has been to try to right a wrong and ensure as best he could that no other innocent person would have to endure w

sir cliff, how are you feeling about the judgment?inted, now he was vindicated. sir cliff is of course very pleased with the court's judgment today. he never expected, after 60 years in the public eye, that his privacy and reputation would be tarnished in this way and that he would need to fight such a battle. the singer was awarded £210,000, but is likely to get more. the bbc is also facing millions in legal costs. this is a ma55ivejudgment for sir cliff richard and pretty devastating for the bbc. it raises questions for the entire media about how they cover police investigations. his friends saw the physical and mental toll over the last four years. he was determined to fight this case and, in a way, even if he hadn't won the case, i think he has won it as far as the public is concerned. becau5e personally, i've never heard so many people saying, i hope he wins this case, and it was terrible, that invasion of privacy. and he has won it, in privacy law. the decisions made in the bbc newsroom to report the police investigation into si

but that did pay sir cliff richard.th yorkshire force should not have confirmed what it is great is highly sensitive and confidential details to the bbc or facilitated a meeting between a senior detective and dan johnson. so meeting between a senior detective and danjohnson. so there was some criticism of south yorkshire police, definitely, ending weeks of that followed this broadcast but today, south yorkshire police witnesses have been described as will a blind clear. thank you very much. also in the next half hour, we'll be speaking to gloria hunniford, a long term friend of sir cliff richard, who gave testimony at the case. let's return to the breaking news report of a few moments ago, metropolitan police investigating the grenfell tower fire have carried out three interviews under caution. our home affairs correspondent is here and can tell us more. it's a significant development. the police have been doing, as they say themselves, searches, frederik tests, digital scanning of the tower, photography, they are broug

and having made that balance, he decided to come down in favour of sir cliff richard.e other way, so it's not going to be a total ban on naming people who are the subject of inquiries, but i think journalists are going to think twice before they do it in future. i think there is a very clear red line here. they should not name anybody until the police have reason to prosecute. i guess the bbc will probably argue that, in the interests of other witnesses coming forward, the very fact that a named person is in the public eye will bolster the case, if you like, for the prosecution. however, once you have made allegations of that nature against somebody, you cannot unmake them. you know, whilst the ruling in court has completely exonerated sir cliff, the story remains. and nothing, no apology, will actually take that harm away. joshua, the bbc's push for an exclusive on this, you know, they entered that coverage for an award. they led on the story, the helicopter. as a former correspondent of the bbc, how do you feel about that whole editorial aspect of it? if it was the r

the pay sir cliff richard for part of his legalfees. for part of his legal fees. the bbc also tried and failed today, to see if it could get permission to appeal the judgement. thejudge did not appear massively impressed with the bbc‘s argument, calling them "irrelevant, wrong and meaningless". the bbc now has to decide whether it might go directly to the court of appeal. but it said that while there were issues of significant press freedom that might need to be looked at, it also did not want to prolong the case. so the bbc really has to decide whether it is going to risk a potentially more of licence fee payer's money or deal with the issue that is pink is a significant threat to the press freedoms, that it does not allow the bbc and other newspapers to properly report police investigations. the judge today said that was a misreading of his judgement, judge today said that was a misreading of hisjudgement, that the bbc have quite a significant decision to make. lucy manning reporting. the european union's chief brexit negotiator says

the daily star reports on sir cliff richard winning his privacy case against the bbc.hether the landmark case is good forjustice, fearing that not naming suspects may protect the guilty in the future. in agreement is the sun, saying the ruling threatens to gag free speech. however, the daily mail questions what the ruling means for the bbc, saying bbc heads must roll. the guardian also features a picture of sir cliff, but leads on brexit and boris johnson's resignation speech. following with the same story is the metro, as boris tells theresa may it is her last chance to save brexit. in the times, mrs may responds by announcing she will tour britain this summer in a bid to get sceptical tories behind her brexit plans. however, the focus of the page is a photo of the youngest member of the 12 boys trapped in the thai caves. the boys spoke publicly for the first time at a press conference in chiang rai. that's it for the papers tonight. well, those are the front pages, and two or three big stories here. but let's start with boris johnson's brexit plan in the guardian, on

the bbc has agreed to pay £850,000 on account of sir cliff richard's total costs.ification of that figure, but that seems to be the figure. in addition to that there was a big argument as to the precaution —— the proportion of costs the bbc should pay in relation to the costs incurred by south yorkshire police, the costs they are liable to pay to sir cliff richard. and that was decided in the same proportion that thejudge had decided liability in this case, in other words the bbc has paid 65%, south yorkshire police to pay 35% of those costs. after those very technical arguments about costs, gavin miller qc on behalf of the bbc began his submission, seeking leave to appeal the judgment that mrjustice mann handed down last week. the focus really saying thejudge had made errors in law, in particular relating to the balance between sir cliff richard's article eight right under the human rights act, his right to privacy, on the one hand, and the bbc‘s right to freedom of expression to publish his name and to cover the raid on his home on the other. there were additiona

sir cliff richard says he's relieved after winning his privacy case against the bbc.some kind of legal advice that would stop them. i was never even arrested let alone charged. the bbc apologises for any distress caused to sir cliff, but is considering an appeal. borisjohnson appeals to theresa may to reconsider her brexit strategy — warning the uk will exist in a state of "miserable, permanent limbo" unless she changes course. it is not too late to save brexit. we have changed tack once and we can change again.

it was almost four years ago that bbc news revealed sir cliff richard was being investigated about ault, and showed helicopter pictures of south yorkshire police officers searching his home. there were many complaints from those watching, and the bbc‘s head of newsgathering, jonathan munro, came on newswatch shortly after to defend the coverage. he was pressed by viewers particularly on the decision to send up that helicopter and broadcast live footage of the raid. the helicopter is another newsgathering resource, like deploying a camera crew at ground level. any visual medium, television or a still photographer, is going to want to get a clear view of an event happening, which is newsworthy, it was a newsworthy event, as anthony says himself. getting a clear view, and only by getting that could we see how many officers were involved, and viewers could make a judgment about whether they felt the search was appropriate, in terms of its size and scale. helicopter footage on the 10:00 news and the 6:00 news that evening was only 21 seconds of coverage, and there was less than a minute o

richard in legal costs, thatis sir cliff richard in legal costs, that is an initial figure, sir cliffin the low 30s —— 3s the midlands, temperatures in the low 30s —— 35 degrees. temperatures in the mid—30s now and in the next couple of hours, the temperatures might creep up a fraction. but pretty much on target. the record of 36.7 fourjuly still stands and at the moment, it is looking increasingly unlikely we will reach that. how are these record temperatures recorded, what are the facts behind what the temperature is? you mean when it gets hot, why do we get such high values? you see, i wish i had said that! 0bviously you see, i wish i had said that! obviously in heatwave, we need the source. obviously in heatwave, we need the source. there is nothing unusual about it. it is hot air from the south, it is just very unusual for it to travel some more north to our clouds. but to achieve these really high values, 35, inland, you need particularly calm weather and dry ground. you need a lot of strong sunshine which is what we have had for a long time. and the reason why we need very dry

what does one say to sir cliff richard?e say, well, we are sorry, the bbc has said, we are sorry. they have not, they have said, we are sorry he is distressed, they refuse to issue a proper apology which was probably the legal position. i don't think thatis the legal position. i don't think that is mean hearted, that is probably legal advice, but he was bitter he did not have that apology. the lawyers have not had a wonderful run in the past few months, one might argue, i don't know. this is an extraordinary case and now president has been set. it will be fascinating see whether as in the leather suitcase, the newspaper editors and publishers do back the bbc because it is in their interest to do so, or whether the urge to kick the bbc will be so strong, they cannot yet. but fascinating. a couple of other stories. back on the front page of the times, losing religion can be seriously good for your wealth. this is an extraordinary story suggesting that being religious is not particularly good if you want your country to get ri

sir cliff richard, i understand, relation to the costs.ange the entire landscape in relation to who pays the costs. costs follow the event. it is eventually the party that succeeds that gets their costs. we will wait to see what is determined this morning in relation to the costs. but they are very, very considerable. clive coleman, thank you, speaking to us from the royal courts ofjustice. you, speaking to us from the royal courts of justice. still to you, speaking to us from the royal courts ofjustice. still to come: reality tv star megan mckenna talks about the impact of online trolling on her life. and time now for the latest news with annita mcveigh. good morning. there's a warning by a group of mps that the number of heat—related deaths in the uk could triple by the middle of the century. the environmental audit committee says the current hot weather could become the new normal and the government must do more to ensure vulnerable people are looked after. the united states has agreed to work towards lowering trade barriers with the eu

sir cliff always denied the allegations and was never arrested or charged.e ruling as "wonderful news". the bbc says it's very sorry for the distress caused to sir cliff, but will look at appealing the decision. britain's former foreign secretary, borisjohnson, has given a scathing resignation speech. he told the uk parliament, it's not too late to save brexit, but right now, a fog of self—doubt is descending over the process. mrjohnson also said the prime minister's current brexit plan would leave britain in a "miserable, permanent limbo." he resigned last week in protest, saying he could no longer support theresa may's approach to brexit. australian scientists say they have developed a blood test to detect melanoma in its early stages. the test, billed as a world first, should make it easier to spot the skin cancer before it becomes fatal. currently, doctors rely on skin examinations and biopsies. these are images of dozens of wildfires that have sparked across the arctic circle due to unusually hot weather. several areas have been evacuated. tens of thous

sir cliff was never arrested or charged over a historical child sexual abuse claim. of the press. let's remind ourselves of the case. i can't really answer to many questions at the moment. i can't really answer too many questions at the moment. it's going to take a little while for me to get over the whole emotional factor. so i hope you'll forgive me. cheering and applause. thank you. viewers may remember the bbc put up a helicopter. sir cliff lived in a gated community and the only way to get the pictures, the bbc argued, was to send a helicopter up and that helicopter showed pictures of the police going into sir cliff richard's apartment. what is significant about this ruling is, the judge found that it wasn't that, if you like, the sensationalist nature of the reporting, the putting the helicopter up that breached sir cliff's privacy. it was the very fact that the bbc published his name and broadcast his name as a suspect, and i stress the word "suspect", in a police investigation. the case clearly confirms that individuals, including high profile ones, have a re

well, the bbc got a sense today of just how big the bill it is facing for losing that case against sir cliffd it cliff richard last week. the bill so far and it will rise significantly is £1.5 million. £850,000 of that as you said is to pay sir cliff richard for part of his legal these. the bbc also tried and failed today to see if it could get permission to appeal thejudgment. thejudge if it could get permission to appeal the judgment. the judge did if it could get permission to appeal thejudgment. thejudge did not appear massively impressed with the bbc‘s arguments, calling them irrelevant, wrong and meaningless. the bbc now has to decide whether it might go directly to the court of appeal, but it said that while there we re appeal, but it said that while there were issues of significant press freedom that might need to be looked at, it also did not want to prolong the case, so the bbc really has to decide whether it is going to risk potentially more licence fee payers money or to do with this issue that it thinks is a significant threat to press freedom, that it doesn't allow the bbc and

sir cliff always denied the allegations and was never arrested or charged.s". the bbc says it's very sorry for the distress caused to sir cliff, but will look at appealing the decision. european financial authorities have fined google a record $5 billion over the use of its android operating system. the european commission says the company illegally used the technology to "cement its dominant position" in searches. google has denied any wrongdoing, and plans to appeal the ruling. our technology correspondent rory cellan—jones reports. advert: if you believe in innovation from everyone, then welcome to android. it sees itself as a benevolent giant that just wants to help us communicate. the eu has a different view. google has engaged in illegal practices to cement its dominant market position in internet search. google's android operating system runs on three quarters of europe's mobile phones. it is free for phone makers, but the eu says that google applies conditions which promote its own interests at the expense of rivals. there are three complaints — that

sir cliff always denied the allegations and was never arrested or charged.ling as "wonderful news". the bbc says it's very sorry for the distress caused to sir cliff, but will look at appealing the decision. britain's former foreign secretary, borisjohnson, has given a scathing resignation speech. he told the uk parliament, it's not too late to save brexit, but right now, a fog of self—doubt is descending over the process. mrjohnson also said the prime minister's current brexit plan would leave britain in a "miserable, permanent limbo." he resigned last week in protest, saying he could no longer support theresa may's approach to brexit. elon musk has apologised for calling the british cave diver vernon unsworth, a "paedo", on twitter. mr unsworth helped rescue the 12 boys and their coach from a cave in thailand. elon musk offered to build a mini—submarine to get them out, but mr unsworth said it wouldn't have worked, prompting elon musk‘s outburst. the tech entrepreneur said he had "spoken in anger" after mr unsworth ridiculed his rescue plan as a pr stunt.

the corporation agreed to pay £850,000 to cover the legal fees sir cliff richard has incurred.perature reached 35 degrees this afternoon at heathrow and hotter in surrey, making it the hottest day. medicinal cannabis will be legalised on prescription in the uk following the high—profile cases of children with severe epilepsy being denied access to canada's oil. and as we have just been saying the bbc will pay £850,000 to sir cliff richard's legal cost of following his privacy case. the official vote leave campaign spend more than 2.7 million on ads targeted at people on facebook to help it to win the 2016 european union referendum. the us social media giant has released these ads two mps on fake news, meaning everyone, not those that they were aimed at, can now see them. let's go to our correspondent at westminster. what does the data actually show? this data set, which has been given by facebook to the house of commons media select committee contains images and the text from 1400 adverts placed on facebook by various parts of the vote leave campaign during the eu referendum. t

the sun leads on sir cliff richard, with an emotional photo and a headline that nods towards the futureing the papers. starting with borisjohnson, his big resignation statement. boris twists the knife. and he was putting himself centrestage. a lot of fa nfa re himself centrestage. a lot of fanfare before the stricken nation speech. he sat in the same spot geoffrey howe had sat in for his famous cabinet resignation speech. putting the knife in to margaret thatcher. so a lot of build—up to this, from boris and his supporters who were around him to make him look popular. and the chamber was almost empty. no cabinet ministers there, no big labour beasts. you could argue they have enough going on. every big member of parliament has some sort of crisis within their own party or within brexit so it is understandable in some ways. and it was a strong speech whether you are a boris supporter or somebody who cannot stand him. it did not have the usual jokes, he cannot stand him. it did not have the usualjokes, he was certainly aiming for more serious rabbit has speech. people will say there was n

bbc trust, lord patten, says the corporation would be crazy to appeal against the ruling in the sir cliff richard privacy case. heroes of the london bridge terrorist attack, including two people who died, are being honoured for their bravery. and the 147th open championship is under way at carnoustie — can britain's top golfers break the americans‘ grip on the sport's majors? and coming up on bbc news... lewis hamilton signs a new deal with mercedes worth up to £40 million a year over at least two more seasons. good afternoon and welcome to the bbc news at one. there has been a big rise in violent crimes recorded by police in england and wales — with murder, manslaughter and knife crime all up in the 12 months to march. official figures for the year to march also show a 30% increase in robberies, but offences involving guns are down. the crime survey, which is an indicator of longer—term trends, suggests no change in overall crime levels. richard lister has more. dawn raids this morning in west london, part of an operation aimed at drug dealers and knife crime suspects. so far this week t

that is for sir cliff richard ‘s legal fees.e bbc is going to be paying again on account, £315,000 to south yorkshire police. that is for their legal costs as well. so more from court as the morning goes on. the headlines. the heatwave continues across the uk as a report by mps warned it could be 7000 heat related deaths by 2050. as we have been hearing, the bbc has agreed to pay cliff richard the sum of £850,000 on account to cover his legal costs as it begins an appeal process after losing its privacy case. partial results from pakistan general election suggest former cricket captain is on course to become the country's next prim minister. and in sport, gareth thomas has extended his lead in the tour de france. as he chases his first title. celtic came from behind to beat rosenborg 3—1 in the first leg of their champions league second round qualification tie. the return leg is in norway is next wednesday. and manchester united beat milan after 26 penalties in the international champions cup in california. united won the spotki

sir cliff was never arrested or charged.0,000 in damages. thousands of tributes left by the public to remember those killed or injured in the manchester arena terrorist attack are to be preserved. more than 10,000 items were left in locations across the city in the weeks after the suicide bombing, including notes, poems, balloons and drawings. they'll be documented and digitised at manchester art gallery, thanks to a £100,000 national lottery grant. the time is nine minutes past six. we will get the weather and talk about perhaps those record temperatures that some are predicting we might see in the uk. if all we need to talk about getting hot and sweaty while cycling. the picture over your shoulder, that man is looking hot and sweaty with good reason. geraint thomas still in the right place to win this geraint thomas. every day, we have said there is one stage to go. today they will get to a flat stage, a little bit of undulation and eight gradual climb and a sprint at the end and thatis climb and a sprint at the end and th

it was almost four years ago that bbc news revealed sir cliff richard was being investigated about aofficers searching his home. there were many complaints from those watching and the bbc‘s head of newsgathering, jonathan munro, came on austin shortly after to defend the coverage. he was pressed by viewers on the decision to send up that helicopter and broadcast live footage of the raid. the helicopter is another newsgathering resource, like employing a camera crew at ground level. any visual medium is going to want to get a clear view of an event happening, which is newsworthy, it was a newsworthy event as anthony says himself. getting a clear view and only by getting that could we see how many officers were involved and viewers could make a judgment about weather they felt the search was appropriate in terms of its size and scale. helicopter footage in terms of its size and scale. helicopterfootage on in terms of its size and scale. helicopter footage on the ten 0'clock news and the six o'clock news that evening was only 21 seconds of coverage and there was less tha n seconds of co

the bbc has agreed to pay £850,000 towards sir cliff's legal fees, after it broadcast a police searchl a privacy ruling against it. our special correspondent lucy manning is here. what does this mean for the bbc? well, today we are starting to get an understanding of the size of the bill the bbc is facing for losing that case against sir cliff richard last week. it stands at eu million, including £850,000 last week. it stands at £1.1 million, including £850,000 going towards his legal fees. million, including £850,000 going towards his legalfees. that million, including £850,000 going towards his legal fees. that will increase as well. and today the bbc tried and failed to get permission to appeal the judgment. the judge, tried and failed to get permission to appealthejudgment. thejudge, i have to say, was fairly dismissive of the bbc‘s arguments, he said some of the bbc‘s arguments, he said some of them were irrelevant, wrong and meaningless. the bbc has to decide now whether it will go straight to the court of appeal, or tried to go to the court of appeal. the bbc says it doesn't wa

a high courtjudge will rule this morning in the case brought by sir cliff richard against the bbc fore investigation and raid of the star's home in 2014. the ruling is expected to give guidance on the contentious issue of whether a suspect who has not been charged, can be lawfully named by the media. our legal correspondent, clive coleman reports. when south yorkshire police raided sir cliff richard home in 2014, he was in portugal, but the bbc was outside with a helicopter. it broadcast pictures and named him as a suspect in an alleged historical sexual assault. its corresponding glenjohnson had sexual assault. its corresponding glen johnson had arranged sexual assault. its corresponding glenjohnson had arranged the bbc‘s attendance in their vans with south yorkshire police. cliff richard denied the allegation, he was questioned but never arrested or charged. he sued south yorkshire police and the bbc for breach of privacy. the four settled its case and apologised to the staff or that show circulation caused by disclosing his private information to the bbc stopped we. the court under

a high courtjudge will rule this morning on the privacy case brought by sir cliff richard against the questioned but never arrested or charged. we'll bring you that ruling when it comes. sexting and not drinking alcohol — does this explain why

sir cliff richard won his privacy case against the bbc.or appeal and he described them, just to use a couple of words, he described a couple of words in court today as wrong, irrelevant and meaningless with no prospect of success. he also touched on the bbc‘s argument that this is going to change the way in which the media can report on the early stages of an investigation. and, in court today, thejudge said his originaljudgment did not create a blanket ban on reporting on police investigations. he did not, he said, intend it to have a chilling effect on journalism. what happens next is the bbc can decide now whether they are going to take this any further. they can go to a judge at the court of appeal and seek permission that way. we have had a statement from the bbc saying that this is a complex case and while they hadn't decided on whether to pursue an appeal, they had sought permission today in order to keep all options open. they have 21 days in which they have to submit an application, if that is the way they want to go. and, just on

and the top story in the uk: sir cliff richard says that senior bbc managers have to "carry the can", after he won his privacy case over the corporation's coverage of a police raid on his home. now on bbc news live to singapore for asia business report. the european commission slabs are record $5 billion on google. and now mariette, the world ‘s biggest hotel chain becomes the biggest company to announce it is breaking its habit of using plastic straws. good morning and welcome to asia business report. live from singapore. google has been lined a whopping $5 billion by the european commission, it is the biggest fine it has ever handed out toa biggest fine it has ever handed out to a company and it is all connected to a company and it is all connected to the compa ny‘s to a company and it is all connected to the company's android operating system for mobile phones. its competition commissioner said google has abused its market dominance. this is very serious illegal behaviour going on since 2011. it is a big market and it is a very serious offence and there, from our guidelines, comes

i'm sure the whole house would join me in congratulating sir cliff richard on his successful action against the bbc who behaved atrociously in that invasion. would my right honorable friend the prime minister look at changing the law so that the suspect is not named by the media except in exceptional cases until such time as they are charged. i put forward, i know i'm off the prime minister's christmas card, but it's the bill that goes cross party and widespread support. i'm more than happy to call it cliff law but can she please agree to at least look at this because sir cliff is not alone and it's not limited to sexual offenses. they should not be named in the media until they have been charged. >> she has obviously raised what is a very important issue. she's raised in the specific case in which she said it is the case that is not just relate to someone who is well-known and in the public eye. this is a difficult issue. it does have to be dealt with sensitively. it is something i look that when i was home secretary because there may well be cases where actually the publication of a name

this is crass stupidity, as bad as the news item about sir cliff richard, where it transpired that he would have thought they had learned a lesson but, no. well, we put those points to bbc news and they told us. this investigation has a huge impact for all of the families, staff and patients at the hospital, as well as members of the wider community. it is clearly in the interests of the public. the nurse who was arrested has been named and pictured widely across the uk media as well as previously choosing to speak to a newspaper about herjob in 2013. the bbc has been clear in their reporting she has not been charged and has currently been released on bail. and thank you for all your comments this week if you want to share your opinions on bbc news and current affairs, or even appear on the programme, you can call us. ore—mail. you can find us on twitter. do have a look at the website. the address for that is bbc.co.uk/newswatch. reach the results of damages again this weekend. lots of heat, locked up. it will be in uncovered will nights sleeping in the south. then pushes 10—12d. it d

fran unsworth, the bbc‘s director of news and current affairs, apologised to sir cliff but said the casean important principle around the public‘s right to know was at stake. the former chair of the bbc trust questioned the decision in an interview with newsnight. i hope it's not too damaging, but i don't think this is bbcjournalism at its best. this is not what a public service broadcasting should be doing, and i think that the decisions made by some very good people whom i'm very much respect in the bbc were wrong. it would be crazy for the bbc, arguing that there is some principle of freedom of speech involved, to appeal this decision. i think they should swallow ha rd, say decision. i think they should swallow hard, say they made a mistake, and apologise they have to cliff richard, move on and not do it again. lord patten talking to emily makers. donald trump has now said that he holds vladimir putin personally responsible for russian interference in the 2016 us election. at a press conference on monday president trump seemed to put russia's denials above the conclusions of us intell

sir cliff is not alone and it's not confined to sexual offenses.ts should not be named by the media until such time as they're charged. >> can i say to my right honorable friend she has obviously raised what is a very important issue. she's raised it in the specific case of the cliff richards but as she said it is the case that this is not just -- this does not just relate to somebody well known and in the public eye. this is a difficult issue. it does have to be dealt with sensitively. it is something i looked at when i was home secretary. because the -- there may well be cases where actually the publication of a name enables other victims to come forward and therefore to strengthen the case against an individual. so this is, i have to say i think this is not an either you do all of one or all of another. this is an issue for careful judgment. but in exercising that careful judgment the police have to recognize their responsibilities and the media need to recognize their responsibilities as well. >> it's good to welcome the honorable lay i di back

daily mirror, a good day to sit —— sir cliff richard, a bad day for justice.he media naming people accused of crimes or who are suspect that of crimes. the sun has taken a punt on one of his old songs. it is not funny. we can't talk any more. he is very emotional after this court case. after winning the case against the bbc, he will be awarded £210,000. that will be reviewed again. the daily mail is taking a look, bbc heads must roll. he said the boss has acted as a judge and jury the boss has acted as a judge and jury and executioner and he is saying he did not go near children now. what the daily mail is saying is that bbc it acted idiotically, but i fear thejudge but is that bbc it acted idiotically, but i fear the judge but that ruling could let the police raid your home at 4am without facing public scrutiny. we will talk about this later. the other story on the financial times, the fine for google did happen. they were fined one 4 billion euros because of their domination of the search market and how they the android software on a lot of smart phones. it

sir cliff was awarded an initial £210,000 in damages yesterday, after a judge ruled that the bbc hadacy with its coverage of a police raid on his home in 2014. jon donnison has more. # congratulations...# for cliff richard and his fans, something to celebrate after a four—year ordeal. 0ne national treasure, pitted against another. and the bbc the big loser. i don't think this is the bbc journalism at its best. the decisions made by some very good people whom i much respect in the bbc were wrong. this case and those decisions, made in part by bbc editors fran unsworth and jonathan munroe, could end up co—ing the corporation millions in license fee payers‘ money. and the bbc is now considering an expensive appeal. i think it would be crazy for the bbc arguing that there is some principle of freedom of speech involved to appeal this decision. i think they should swallow hard, say they made a mistake, apologise as they have to cliff richard, move on and not do it again. after he left court yesterday, cliff richard said the bbc apology and more than £200,000 in damages was not enough. he

sir cliff richard has won his high court privacy battle against the bbc, and was awarded £210,000 indamages. theresa may addresses a meeting of tory mps amid bitter divisions in their ranks over her brexit policy. it comes after the former foreign secretary said the prime minister's blueprint would leave the uk in a "miserable, permanent limbo." their first public appearance since being freed from a flooded cave — the thai schoolboys talk of the moment they were found by british divers. the leader of the neo—nazi group national action has been sentenced to eight years in prison for keeping the organisation going after it was banned as a terrorist organisation. in a moment it will be time for sportsday, but first a look at what else is coming up this evening on bbc news... theresa may insists there's still time to negotiate a brexit deal with the european union, but borisjohnson says there's a ‘fog of self—doubt‘ over britain's ambitions. we'll hear the thoughts of conservative mp dominic grieve and labour's stephen kinnock — two remainers on opposite sides of the political divide. he

sir cliff was awarded an initial £210,000 in damages yesterday, after a judge ruled that the bbc haddonnison has more. # congratulations...# for cliff richard and his fans, something to celebrate after a four—year ordeal. 0ne national treasure, pitted against another. and the bbc the big loser. i don't think this is the bbc journalism at its best. the decisions made by some very good people whom i much respect in the bbc were wrong. this case and those decisions, made in part by bbc editors fran unsworth and jonathan munroe, could end up co—ing the corporation millions in license fee payers' money. and the bbc is now considering an expensive appeal. i think it would be crazy for the bbc arguing that there is some principle of freedom of speech involved to appeal this decision. i think they should swallow hard, say they made a mistake, apologise as they have to cliff richard, move on and not do it again. after he left court yesterday, cliff richard said the bbc apology and more than £200,000 in damages was not enough. he said heads deserved to roll at the bbc. there must be something

the bbc is to pay more than three quarters of £1 million towards sir cliff richard's legal costs followinghan 130 people are unaccounted for after the ban that collapsed in laos on monday. —— laos. thousands of people were forced to leave their phone. the former world cricket star imran khan is set to be prime minister of pakistan. hello, welcome to our lookahead at what the papers were digging us tomorrow. with me is lyn davidson and jason beattie. to look at these front pages which we have our hands on. the financial times leads on facebook‘s woes as more than $120 billion was wiped off the value of its shares. that is the biggest one—day fall in one stock in us history. the guardian has the same story, saying the social media site pays the price for the data scandal. and the times also has the facebook story, reporting that the social media site allows anti—semitic posts to remain on the platform after they have been flagged by users as offensive. the eye leads on the home secretary decision to allow medicinal cannabis to be prescribed to cannabis with exceptional critical need after pa

. >>> new images of a rescue who saved an oregon woman whose car plunged 200 feet down a cliff by big sir. angela hernandez had been stranded for a week at a remote beach off of highway 1. now, hernandez has been released from the hospital and is recovering with loved ones. she was on her way to southern california from oregon to visit family when she crashed on july 6th. late last night, we learned she swerved to avo an animal in the road and survived by drinking water from the radiator of her jeep. friday evening, two hikers spotted her white jeep. hernandez was injured but in stable condition when she was rescued. amazing stuff. >>> we have a follow-up to a tragic ordeal for an alameda county firefighter. battalion chief john whiting is recovering in the hospital today after a pit bull mauled his face. it happened yesterday as he and his team responded to a house fire in san leandro. 20 pit bulls were inside the home. all but two were rescued. after the flames were out, whiting was talking to a 15-year-old girl who was holding one of the dogs on a leash. suddenly, that dog, a large mal