the competition, referring to the mentioned decision of the supreme court of appeals and the absence of a final decision of the sixth court of appeals against klymenko himself oleksandr so klymenko is known for the fact that, as a detective, he usually opened criminal proceedings on the fact of the corruption of the current deputy head of the president's office, oleg tatarov, in the case of these apartments of mr. mykytas for the national guard of ukraine, where at first they were supposed to be built in the center of the capital, then they were built on the outskirts and there was a difference of several tens of millions of hryvnias, which was later solved by tatarov himself, as it were, by bribing the appraiser, the person who was supposed to carry out, well, as far as i know, i i remember this story, and my decision regarding the assessment of the value of these apartments, that is, the maximum value for these apartments in the center and on the outskirts of kyiv was for the soldiers of the national guard. in fact, the president of ukraine or the president's office there should pick up the phone, as vitaliy shabo

view of the experience of this court, which, by the way, should have been liquidated a long time ago, ms. tetyana, i do not understand the position of the sixth court of appealsshe should announce their decision on the appeal to the decision of the district administrative court by the 18th, the 19th, what about that ? first of all, it is necessary to look at the most convincing. and it could be because the luaz court refers to a non-existent norm of the law, and this is absolutely a decision, it was not valid, and therefore expectations from the side commissions for the court's decision or settlement of this decision were absurd, the year the decision did not have legal force and the commission could work as it shows, as today's practice shows, but now they have started a meeting , uh, a meeting can be convened if you really want to, ah, the sixth court of appeals, in my opinion, simply decided not to make any decision because it is political , it would probably be difficult for him to overturn the decision of uazku, and practically the judges did not want to make a completely illegal decision, that is why they simply refused the court hearings for the first

court of ukraine, many people consider it illegitimate in general. nevertheless, the appeal against this decision was considered by the sixth court of appeal of the citytil the 18th. they promised to issue er, well, some kind of verdict in this sense, but as of yesterday, i didn't see any specifics, so i have a question for you: will these two points become true, that we did not wait for the final decision of the sixth court of appeals, and that the appointment of the head of sap will be signed by the acting responsibilities the prosecutor general then, uh, somehow i don't know the background for contesting all this, in fact, you have to understand that there really are a lot of components, uh, in this matter, political , as well as legally, i also don't see any obstacles for the acting official to actually appoint the head of sap because, well, there are already many examples in history when acting prosecutor generals actually performed their administrative powers and appointed heads of prosecutors' offices of various levels, so i think that in this case, it will also be unprofitable for the authorities to use this argument there for delegitimization

internal issues sometimes and so on, so you can the situation with uazk sapom with this court of appeal in the sixthppellate court which now actually decides the fate of the winner of this competition, which took place six months ago, okay, and i will return to the south of ukraine with a small remark, please note that our ports are currently unlocked, partially unlocked, and the grain has gone beyond the borders , that is, the ships are taking out the grain, this means that moscow cannot do anything on the black sea try to block all its efforts close this is a sign that we have the greatest power there and we can say dictate the conditions therefore the liberation of the south looks the most effective in the short-term perspective with other regions, therefore, this is another beacon and how much we ourselves already not having such a powerful fleet as muscovy, but having modern weapons and taking these steps, as we have already talked with you, by closing the sky to them, closing their eyes, that is, we can already dictate our conditions regarding e -th appointment of the winning competition on sa

district administrative court of kyiv to cancel the work order of this and we expect a wise, balanced and above all honest and transparent decision of the sixth court of appeal work the results of the competition are obvious and it is necessary to finally wrap up this story with the sap prosecutor and move further in the direction of the european future, and at this point we will pass the floor to the news, our colleague iryna koval is already ready to present her live broadcast from the editorial office of espresso and iryna, thank you colleagues literally in a moment i will tell about the most important events at this time in the news program 15 in ukraine and chas novin on the espresso tv channel greetings in the studio of iryna koval vinnytsia in mourning, the city is recovering from russian terror from the rocket attack on in the center of the city, 23 people were killed, including three children, the bodies of 11 adults have not yet been identified, 180 three victims, 82 of them were hospitalized, among the wounded, four children, doctors are working at full capacity, says the head of the vinnytsia military administration serhiy borzov, the doctors wor

course, thank you, sir, and even yesterday i simply missed whether there was a decision of the sixth court of appeal on the decision of the usk. somehow, nothing appeared in the information field about this matter. well, you know, i did not see such a thing the decision really, although the deadline should have been such a decision should have been made, it is not in the register, i looked in the register, i myself was interested . on the basis of the results because we also want to protect the results of our work and so that the manager could work peacefully and the results of his work were not canceled as a result and were not nullified as a result. occupying administrative positions and positions in the special anti-corruption specialized prosecutor's office, today we will remind you that the results of the competition have been recognized, but this is not yet the final appointment, but it is not yet certain. conclusion of the general prosecutor's office, and there is no head there from today, let's talk about it in particular with volodymyr tzibulko, volodymyr. we welcome you. good evening. i re

yesterday's video address, so we are waiting what there, according to the decision of the sixth court of appeal, i think that he will not take responsibility and slow down our movement towards the european union, he will cancel the decision of the court of appeal of kyiv, the city of kyiv, and tomorrow there will be a meeting, i hope, of the competition commission, where are they? i think that there will be no problems to figure out who scored how many points and uh to decide and declare the winner uh, that's another matter, it's not ms. venediktova at that time in december of last year she took it upon herself to because she said that you have candidates to pass a special inspection and i don’t know exactly. well, in my opinion, to what extent i have the information correctly, the results of the special inspection have not yet been provided. so that nothing prevents the competition commission from making the decision that society and the president are waiting for, and the employees of sap are also waiting for, and they want to work effectively, but they can't for these reasons that i don't hav

shaburin says that this process will be delayed anyway, and for example, the sixth court of appeals iseeting tomorrow and says that the competition was illegal goodbye, you can all disagree and you do not rule out the seat of the head of the sap will continue either she will or he will be appointed not quite a legitimate way that will allow uh well let's say to undermine his authority and his opportunities at any moment, and i hope that there will not be all all scenarios, because mark correctly said that we absolutely have membership in the european union tied up in black and white and it is written under it that we must to be full-fledged anti-corruption bodies with leaders therefore, there will be no talks about membership that the authorities are currently dreaming of until december without a full-fledged appointed , functioning and active head of sap - the head of nabu will be there, the stakes are much higher than just er, macro-financial and macroeconomic financing from the european union or from america is a question of our future in general, i would say so. and how do they tel

the secretary of the national security council said this, this court undermined the competition for the national anti-corruption prosecutor, what is the sixth administrative court of appealcity of kyiv doing? the prosecutor, what kind of garden without the involvement of witnesses, without the involvement of the parties in written proceedings, well, the same trivial case, nobody knows about it, such a trifle yesterday there was some decision, we don't know because it's a closed implementation, we don't have the documents yet, but from the comments of the press secretary of the court, there should still be some decision by july 18, i honestly have no idea, because it could very well have been an open implementation like 98% of all hearings and what is the motivation behind the closed implementation, so they all just decided and who are they, the judges are just a beautiful trio, but i am not me, they will understand one of these courts said that the historical monument gostinny dvir in us in kyiv is a shopping and entertainment center, well, such a decision accepted by another judge already demolished state competitions that are critically important for ukraine and one wa

it is expected that on the eve of the sixth administrative appeals court will restore the powers of thempetition commission whose work was previously blocked by the district administrative court of the city of kyiv. god, the epic is still going on. with the appointment of a new head of sap, it is not the first year that our journalists remind us of the story of the issue, let's watch a short story together and discuss the story with the appointment of the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office has been going on for almost two years, individual members of the commission, which is supposed to hold the competition, have been sabotaging its work for months by not appearing at the meeting. in the end, according to the results of the competition, the detective of the anti-corruption bureau oleksandr klymenko scored the highest number of points, but part of the commission stubbornly refuses to recognize his victory, except that there was a decision of the district administrative court of kyiv, which is headed by the odious pavlo vovk , about the cancellation of the order o

to litigate this, because it would go to the district court, the court of appeals and to the supreme court, and with a 6-3, and the sixth being very unpredictable since they don't always follow the law, this is a troublesome area, and this what they are gearing up for, and it appears to me, and they are getting ready to mount a fight if necessary. >> kerry, you have often wise lwisely injected some caution as to how far this investigation may go, and based on the latest moves, who do you see as the target of the doj steps the here? folks in trump's circle, as i asked john, or trump himself potentially? >> well, i think it is definitely folks in his circle, including potentially his former chief of staff, and the people close to him in the white house. this most recent information really demonstrates as a practical matter that some of the witnesses including the former pence advisers have more to say. so, there is clearly some information that they could have provided to the grand jury and did not and they are potentially relying on the executive privilege, even though the current president is not, and the justice depart

of counsel. this is what the judge said, this is the sixth time he commented on this. as i've stressed many times, i have serious reservations that the court of appeal'sof willfully is consistent with the modern understanding of the word. it's not consistent with modern case law surrounding the use of that term let alone traditional definition of that term. i previously hold, i am bound by likavoli. there are six, especially had a statute that believes his conduct is wrongful or criminal. steve bannon listened to his lawyer and believed he did the only thing the law permitted. >> let me look at two aspects of what you said. number one, advice of counsel. >> yes, sir. >> so, steve bannon and peter navarro are being charged for contempt of congress because they didn't comply at all and mark meadows and dan scavino not charged. they did cooperate, at least they had discussions with the committee. this is before your time, take that with a grain of salt. did steve bannon get bad legal counsel when the counsel told him not to cooperate? >> i wouldn't say so for this reason. there's a whole body of authoritative opinions from the justice department called o