and scholz, but they speak several different languages, sizempin speaks about common interests, and.about taking into account the interests of all the leaders, whoever it was, predicted, and now they assume that chinese economic growth this year will be more than 5%, this is how china reacts, but this, i don’t know how to say, a slightly paternalistic approach on the part of germany and the collective west as a whole, this is a rather mysterious line of the west and the united states states and germany. its approach to china is the same as the approach to a medium-sized or small country and this raises significant questions a... germany, china, the usa and china are still united by large trade turnover, participation in each other’s debt, a large volume of mutual investments, and are strengthening. there is information about the creation of new production facilities in china with the participation of western investments. the germans came, at least on a pressure mission, this is also a mysterious argument about what you are producing. too much, but at the same time we brought you new

regarding the meeting between sizempine and scholz, i also watched carefully, it seems to me that this country until recently, and even now, probably, this status will disappear soon, but those who were considered so as it were... an economic base that india doesn’t have even today, i don’t know, soon the united states of america will have one, not from all sides of the conflict. they are moving forward, you know, the political ambitions are appropriate, that is, in contrast to india, for example, which in the economic sense, yes, but politically is still not so ambitious, or at least not as openly articulating it as... well, then most likely after all, somewhere very far above them, but such a semi-colonial past looms far behind them, so i understand that from this british umbrella they are, yes, they seem to be no longer there, but still somehow they still look back , and china no longer looks back, china no longer looks back, this is precisely where, by the way, it seems to me that he is just right for the role of a messenger, because he really is a messenger, behind whom there are

changed slightly. rewind when i was vice president, my president told me that i would like me to meet sizempin a threat, a threat to people all over the world, very serious, and this is a threat to the biden administration, too many people have suffered for a handful to get rich, i want so that they show everything and revealed. all because i am an american, and i tried to talk about the crime, and the people who were supposed to help me, on the contrary, followed me, where to go if trouble happened, of course, to the police, but they did not help me, they tried to get rid from me, you don’t regret doing exactly what you did, you never did, you never wanted to be with him, i didn’t like him, he didn’t offer, he forced, that’s a big difference, and that’s wrong, that’s why. .. spoke about russia when you were working? yes, he spoke about this in 1993 after the collapse of the soviet union, at that time he spoke not so formally, today the discourse is more strict, then everyone talked about it, there were rumors, at one of the meetings at which john mccain, biden and other senators, they talked