there's still going to be skept skepticism. as chris said, it's clear, he's now made it unambiguous, no knowledge of it in advance. he is going to face skepticism on that as the investigations play out. ize a talented guy but this adds a big burden in both his time and psychic energy, losing staff and also in terms of scrutiny. that is the type of scrutiny that's going to be real tough. the democrats have been driving this and that's the way our system works. the question now is how sofity indicated are they? people are accepting the leak coming out yesterday of the documents with the redakss, not all of the documents were released. what else is out there and will the democrats time this in a way to hurt him. what's the goal? do they want to wound him as a presidential candidate? what is the political goal? not taking anything from the fact there are legitimate things obviously to investigate here, you about how this happened in terms of oversight and accountability. >> mark, halperin, steve kornaci and chris cillizza. more on