now you could pay a lot of money or work for a company that has paid a lot of money to go sit in a skybox and be completely isolated. and you, obviously, baseball game, it doesn't really matter if people are unequal, but inequality is a big topic right now not only in america, but in the rest of the west. and many economists would say, well, inequality doesn't matter because the price of material goods has gone down so that the poor as well as the rich have cable tv, they've got internet access. do you think of that as true, and are there places where you shouldn't be able to buy something that is better than what you get if you don't have the resources to pay for it? >> guest: right, right. it's a great question, and it goes to the heart of debates about equality and inequality in the democracy. first, a word about skyboxification. when i was a kid, i grew up in the midwest near minneapolis, and so i was a fan of the minnesota twins. and in the mid '60s when i was going to games, the difference between the best seat in the house, a box seat, and a seat in the bleachers, the cheap seats,