is a slamdunk for doubts -- senate democrats? a slamdunk is hard to the senate.there is so much acrimony in that chamber. leader andmajority mitch mcconnell get along. it is more likely they will pass something. is it something the house could pass? that is highly unlikely. do the two bodies have to go into conference committee? can they do it before friday which is when the senate leaves for a five-week break? some say of course we should keep working and stay. some say would be against the law to stay past the august recess. it is some procedural archaic rules in the house bylaws and say they have to recess by august. it would be archaic. nobody would be going to jail. those who really stick to the letter of bylaws are talking about that. a question for our viewers. should congress finish this before they leave for the five-week rate? reached between the house and senate on the veterans affairs health care bill. can this get past the wings of a post -- both parties by friday? >> this is much more likely. we really thought it was falling apart. wereummit democra

is this a slamdunk for senate immigrants? >> a slamdunk is hard in the senate. it is more likely that the senate does pass something. the question is if something will pass the house. the two bodies have to go into conference committee. how long can that take? this is a five week rate coming up. some say we should keep working it is against the law to state passed the august recess. there is some procedural archaic rules in the house bylaws and say they have to recess by august. it would be archaic and nobody would be going to jail. there are people who really stick to the letter of the bylaws. >> that is the question for our viewers. another issue that you have written about in politico is this deal that was reached on the v.a.tiators health-care bill. how is it looking? d?n this get passe >> this is much more likely. many thought was falling apart. wereenate democrats criticizing the house republicans and the house republicans were returning in-kind. they walked away from the negotiations and both sides accuse the other of giving up. and jeff miller have reach

we wanted to come as close as you can to making it a slamdunk for j. r. r. we called it passing a test on the steroids. but we wanted to do that with the goal of asking the question could be some problems that are raised to say that even if there was no doubt about the passing of the test that we still might find reason to say that even a robot come if a robot has reached this level of functioning capacity that we still might say at the end of the that it is not adequate or not it. we are playing the role of a judge which is a very high level particularized role within human community. and for example, as i think we say in the paper quite clearly, very different from other human activities that involve rules, such as for example, driving cars, driving vehicles, center. so that was the sort of task we set for ourselves in trying to do this. and the idea was good we still, even if the robot could perform functionally that well, come up with some reason for thinking or at least trying to problematize the idea that it's not a slamdunk that we would just allow th

. >> even if you believe there is some evidence and you believe that it is not a slamdunk, you ought to go ahead because that is what justice is about. >> if prosecutors started shying away because they would be embarrassed about losing the case, that would not be good for them, or good for the public or for legitimacy of the system. erodes it in any way your sense of invincibility that you lost a case? >> that is easy because i never had a sense of invincibility. anyone who does does not belong in a particular kind of job. >> is it possible you were overconfident in the case you lost? >> i don't know. i don't think so. you should never be overconfident in any case. i lost cases when i was a prosecutor. so i know. in one of the cases i lost a trial, i had more evidence and i was more confident than i was in other cases, but in no case are prosecutors ever overconfident because the system is you have 12 ordinary americans who sit in the box. they may see things differently. go to permit the trial than you expected them to go. i hope it is the case that none of my prosecutors go into t

is a slamdunk for doubts -- senate democrats? a slamdunk is hard to the senate. there is so much acrimony in that chamber. leader andmajority mitch mcconnell get along. it is more likely they will pass something. is it something the house could pass? that is highly unlikely. do the two bodies have to go into conference committee? can they do it before friday which is when the senate leaves for a five-week break? some say of course we should keep working and stay. some say would be against the law to stay past the august recess. it is some procedural archaic rules in the house bylaws and say they have to recess by august. it would be archaic. nobody would be going to jail. those who really stick to the letter of bylaws are talking about that. a question for our viewers. should congress finish this before they leave for the five-week rate? reached between the house and senate on the veterans affairs health care bill. can this get past the wings of a post -- both parties by friday? >> this is much more likely. we really thought it was falling apart. wereummit democr

slamdunk butte a microsoft -- microsoft former ceo may be the new owner of the l.a. clippers by next month. we are digital. see our stories an interview at tvomberg.com and bloomberg plus and tablet. we are streaming on apple tv and amazon fire. ♪ could officially default on the debt by the end of the day as negotiations continue with creditors owed 1.5 billion on that aiding back to 2001. a federal judge will not let argentina pay other bondholders their interest payments unless they also pay out creditors. that would trigger a default as early as 5:00 eastern time today. newsing in the bloomberg reporter covering this story. clearly this is on everyone's mind. what do you think? do not really know. there have been a lot of the turn of events. there have been several meetings between argentine officials and court appointed mediator in new york over the past couple of weeks. yesterday at the final hour the economy minister showed up. 12 hours of talks and people are feeling very optimistic. >> the federal judge in new york is because that is where the bombs were init

heartened because it feels -- it is showing they were willing to try a case that was not a 100% slamdunk where do you stand on this? >> insider trading, i am against it. [laughter] the theu feel that with near-perfect record that the government was not hard enough on insider trading cases? >> they have to come down very hard on a case because in a war that is self-regulating, you have to do that. it is like the irs. why do americans willingly write checks to the irs question that they fear the irs. that means when they bring -- irs? that means when they bring a case they have to be very tough to keep everyone else in line. that is how regulation works on wall street. >> sheelah kolhatkar, this is the same chart -- case i was , ring with keri geiger prosecutors now going after the smaller fish because there are not any of the big fish left for them to try? this investigation started in 2006, 2007, reald and dozens of people, and snared people that perhaps should not have been caught up in their web. cohen. try to get steve quickly he could not get him. they charged his firm. -- >> they co

he's making sure elite athletes make a slamdunk out off the court and in the flash -- in the fashionthe man who dresses the nba could be dressing you with his new clothing line. here to talk about his new venture is warrior boswell. he joins us from l.a.. explain this to us. how did this high-fashion phenomenon come to be? caddo from basketball shorts and hightops to could tour at the end of the game? it,hen you think about there are 82 games, whether it's basketball or hockey eight of 41 home, 41 away. depending on the team and depending on how good they are seeingyou could end up your favorite star 21 times a year. 31 times. if they go to the playoffs, that increases as well. it and have the body for financial means, a hookup with guys like me and other designers and it just happens. it was literally a cottage industry that spiraled. >> why basketball? we look at baseball players, they are pretty honky-tonk looking. >> it's interesting because i work with a lot of baseball players as well. sebastian, there are a lot of guys who make their mark. the thing that's interesting about ba

. >> it is not a slamdunk. >> i am not sure what that means but go ahead. is there any doubt about who those four individuals -- what they may have been doing on the plane? there is no suspicion about who they were or they have not been identified? i think it is just that information about their identities. >> going back to the point about the international investigation, it is an interesting point under whose offices -- apart from the fact that it happened on , surely therritory russians might be in a position to contest the results of any investigation if they feel they are not part of it. going to make sure the results of this investigation are not contested by the russians? >> i don't know we can ensure that. again it is only natural that this took place in ukrainian territory that they would have the lead on the investigation. that is a pretty standard procedure. they have welcomed and invited in a range of international that is an clearly indication of their openness to an international investigation. want the russians involved? , i am not in a positi

we wanted to assume let's say we get there and then really sort of ask doesn't mean it's a slamdunk in the way that turing seems to suggest it is, and we say no. >> can i say something? i quite friendly don't care whether you use hart-fuller-dworkin or anyone. when i read your paper, what i think of paper is about is the key question. the deep question is, under what circumstances can we say that an entity has sympathy for others is part, understands their lot as another slot, understands himself to be part of a community? is a question of reciprocity. underline all of your objections i think, even though you use brazen terms as a teacher's terms as a jurist but i think the type of questions of reciprocity and recognition. that's the reason why i thought that your hypothetical was a real problem because you structured a hypothetical in such a way that it looks like you have conditions of reciprocity. that's also why i talked about in the history of rhetoric because it's about these qualities, the appeal of the ethos, and not just low gross -- logos so you constructed this entity i want

we wanted to assume, let's say we get there and then we sort of ask does that mean it's a slamdunk inhat turing seems to suggest it is? and we say no. >> i quite frankly don't care whether you use hart, fuller, dworkin or anyone. i don't think that's what the paper is about. when i read your paper, what i think your paper is about is a deep question. the key question is, under what circumstances can we say to an entity has sympathy for others, is part, understands their lot as, with another slot. understands himself to be part of a community. it's a question of reciprocity. we've underlined all of your objections, i think, even though jurisprudence. i think your talk about questions of and mutual recognition. that's the reason why i thought that your hypothetical was a real problem, because you structured a hypothetical in such a way that it looks like you have conditions of reciprocity. that's also why i talked about the history of record because rhetoric is about these qualities. the infield the ethos or pay those, and not just logos but ethos and pathos are important to read it. so