could longer than sloss be frankfurt's game chancellor merkel so so she's making the case for european financial hop on the banks of the river mind off the briggs's gets the city of london. this is that of your business i'm going to have elf as well come google it's a noun that became a verb and a very very valuable company twenty years ago today a pair of peerage the students working out of the proverbial garage wanted to make internet searches better so google was born in the excitement of the young democratic internet it's an bishops were courageous delivering the world's information to anyone with internet access but the company its business practices its aim and scope and also its uses have changed over the past twenty years. google's business model is simple users searching the internet tell google about themselves allowing google to sell targeted advertising to businesses the firm i.p.o. at eighty five dollars a share in two thousand and four and quickly rose in value. new products like google mail and acquisitions like you tube expanded google from a search engine into an onlin

center well aware of the fact that when britain leaves the european union of march next year nandan sloss could be front for that's because off the brakes it banks and financial service providers will no longer be able to do business in new countries from the british capital many bankas based of that have already traded on their apartments on the banks of the river thames for the river mine paris is also looking to new those on the move. the awful tower the louvre gallery or the arc de triomphe globally recognised paris landmarks frankfurt can't hold a candle to them it's a room a city hall pales in comparison but frankfurt was germany's financial hub even before the european central bank was headquartered here that's why many in the city's banking district are especially optimistic about britain's exit from the e.u. . front foot it's nice to get a few on frankfurt's an important european financial center but it's also obvious that the city of london remains the european financial center it will take frank for quite some time to take the title on no less an increasing number of london ban

coast until the i had reached land almost twelve hours had passed for its was and remains a giant sloss of a storm sitting on the coast half a florence churning up warm ocean waters the other half dumping torrential rain some places recording more precipitation last night than they usually receive in an entire year and that translates into flooding and when you add the storm surge caused by the hurricane you have the recipe for devastating inland flooding. and here are the pictures that prove florence has a pond storm chasers posted on social media some of the first the most dramatic images of residents in the town of newbern being rescued earlier today newburgh was suddenly submerged with a storm surge forced water into the nearby river flash flooding that called hundreds of residents by surprise in the city of wilmington which is clocking almost twenty four hours of nonstop rain and you can see how easily trees were pushed over by those gale force winds and one storm chaser posted this video to show how eerily calm the city became while the eye of the hurricane passed over tonight in

the press, thatjustice ministers are now wanting to work with the noble and learned baroness butler—slossorce law? indeed, the case of 0wens v 0wens in the supreme court this summer is not typical. only 2% of respondents actually contest the divorce usually and only a handful of those do so in a contested court hearing. however, that said, we have noted thejudgment and — as importantly — the comments by lord justice munby that change is needed. divorce proceedings should involve collaboration to protect the future of the families involved yet, in far too many cases — including cases which end up undefended — they start with a string of allegations, often exaggerated, to demonstrate fault. in view of the overwhelming views of thejudiciary and the professions, and the complete discrediting of the present law by the supreme court in the owens case, can the government have any reason for not supporting the noble lady baroness butler—sloss‘s divorce review bill mentioned by the noble lady baroness anelay? with a view to introducing no—fault divorce, with a simple scheme of application and conf

political process the sloss with a and with z. . well this is not certainly what we have heard from foreign media about to singapore summit i think there's a lot of criticism about the fact that there doesn't seem to be any country to cheat when it is a lot of this is a story meeting between him and trump if you want to look at the south korean side however they would disagree they would say that what was really needed it was one time was a very strong gesture of goodwill between these two countries that have been historically was with each other and that precisely is what is going to contribute toward peace but obviously what we're having problem with now is determining the specifics of how to move forward how will support really the needs iraq is and what kind of concessions with united states offer in return we have seen we might bump a zero zero zero visit to coming out last time then most korea's not interested in giving up its nuclear arms without having any specific guarantees in place and that's really been doing a source of

most recently, baroness butler—sloss introduced into the house of lords a private bill earlier this yearnsultation today. along with their rice say lots of other things, not least of which was mrs 0wen‘s well—publicised fight which was in the supreme court only a couple of months ago which really had commentators around the world talking about wine in england and wales we have quite such an archaic system. how long do you think it will take to implement these reforms? that really is the burning question. although resolution very much welcomes this consultation, we have been campaigning for a number of years and i think everybody who practices in this field, both academics who have looked at the law including most recent professors and judges who work in this area, are pretty much all on the same page that things need to change. i do not doubt there will be a vocal minority groups who feel that this is about making divorce easy, it's going to make it a speedy process, that people have the option to do now fault divorce at the moment but the problem with all of those arguments is no—fault