they maintain that slveas un bauseiothe tu and that is relevant their gument was always that theonstition oue inrpd inige arn ndde d w cold and the constitution was the silver from around it . thihire he s titn he fail written not to conceal or destroy the apple but to give a pride of place. this is always his argument. io a alfeides -roavntlary ew difnt causes. counted slaves as/5 of a person prisns o t sve tra gives dif me soer t psi a aicg meheld no longer exist in the united states. slavery does not appear i the constitution. it refers to slaves as persons whhasdefoom of fousen t meoston a avhane lco's w fnders an pla o a c ward ultat extinctn. othersooked at the provisions as being an obvious compromise in a way that would oer perverse incenves mnt sles ehaor omomo u hthcoin rpti eumie heook tt in order tonderstand the anti slavery tradition the people who said the constitution was antislavery community have tonderane tiip th so t dlaon thnsutn. laraons cal yoveuntaha sa nalht wt eaan that the constitution is framed in order to make the declaration a reality. you have had a lot of re