samuel: the first being, am i telling the story to general smathers just so i will have an excuse toll him? they've already told me i can't just kill him. i wanted to just kill him when i met him and realized he had killed a company of black soldiers for no reason other than what he's. -- he said. they tell me if i killed him they were going to hang me. possibility. and i at major warren don't think that would have happened. he just didn't want to push it that far at that moment. so he concocts a tale as he lays the gun next to him to tell him what happened to his son to make them go for the gun. that is a question as to the veracity of the tale. it is a great tale. charlie: it is it galvanizes your attention. you have no idea how this is going to end. samuel: we asked, who are you going to do to get this job? oh, it is a tarantino movie. some actor is saying make it a tarantino movie in the snow -- sign me up. character,e marvel have you sign a new contract? samuel: i have three movies to go. charlie: that has been a big payday. samuel: now actually. it's been a big pay day in terms

think big money is corrupting, to my example, example, if i am giving 2 million to support senator smathers that is more corrupting than if i was going to give him 10,000 forfor most people at some point the distinction, if you are concerned about one big money person having an undue influence or corrupting influence, it is not clear to me why supporting 2 million for the campaign is different than getting to million to it. how about you? if you were in charge when you strike down the contribution limits? >> well, in a purista purist theoretical world yes, but if i were a justice or politician and recognizing the widespread suspicion that the public has toward politicians and their interaction with money who i am not sure how i would come out. i know justice thomas command i am wondering if they have -- we should revisit this part. there is not an intellectually consistent justification here in separating contributions from expenditures. i don't know if that would be supported judicially and certainly not popularly. which kind of brings me always to what is going on in the states? i find th