secretary-general, julian smit said she _ possible.lian smit said she doesn't expect - possible. secretary-general, julian smit said she doesn't expect natol possible. secretary-general, julian i smit said she doesn't expect nato to offer ukraine membership at the washington summit. what needs to happen— washington summit. what needs to happen for— washington summit. what needs to happen for ukraine to receive this invitation— happen for ukraine to receive this invitation and don't you think ukrainians who give their lives daily— ukrainians who give their lives daily for— ukrainians who give their lives daily for security deserve joining nato? _

secretary-general, julian smit said she _ possible. secretary-general, julian smit said she doesn't _ possible. secretary-general, julian smit said she doesn't expect - possible. secretary-general, julian smit said she doesn't expect natol possible. secretary-general, julian i smit said she doesn't expect nato to offer ukraine membership at the washington summit. what needs to happen— washington summit. what needs to happen for— washington summit. what needs to happen for ukraine to receive this invitation— happen for ukraine to receive this invitation and don't you think ukrainians who give their lives daily— ukrainians who give their lives daily for— ukrainians who give their lives daily for security deserve joining nato? _ daily for security deserve joining nato? second question, it is not that ukraine expects to receive fighter— that ukraine expects to receive fighterjet this spring, is it unrealistic and will ukraine actually— unrealistic and will ukraine actually receive them? additionally, how would _ actually receive them? addi

smit office telling them lies and fabrications, they were able to corroborate the assertions that thesefalsehoods because his chronology did not line up, the times he said -- said he met with the burisma company did not line up. he made allegations about hunter biden being in a country that hunter biden never visited. it's about building that case to be able to prosecute him fully for false statements to the fbi. now have this amount of new evidence and allegations in the court filing because the justice department is trying to implore the judges to not release his or smirnov before. so that's where all this new information comes in. he is revealing it to the government after rest, so that is important to know that because at that point, he should've known the gig is up. it is him kind of coming clean after arrest and knowingly telling the fbi's best he could his contacts with russian officials. laura: the unverified allegation was made and what is called a 1023 form, where the fbi takes in those raw allegations, and it was the foundation of that form for the house republican impeachmen

those are markets where there is still november smit. that was my common.en a high willingness but if you live with obesity and you have tried all kinds of interventions that you have been paying for and most likely not succeeding, now there are opportunities for strong weight loss. it is one that many are willing to pay for. we are still trying to make contracts with consistence. those who need treatment the most and we once make contracts so that those patients are also served and they end up being the biggest. it is quite meaningful. >> you think it will be a bigger market for the drugs? >> bigo with most of our products. it gets in the market and you work with them. it is a private health care market where there is a big demand factor for having insurance, good paying jobs and good coverage. it is different in europe where it is -- they are slower in approving projects. but we have huge coverage. we believe it is a sizable and continued strong growth of opportunity. >> we want to talk about how this drug is actually taken. when it comes to the pills, yo

smit vsus massachusetts.he court did hold that this mid- trial judicialcqttal trickled the double jeopardy clause. it said if massachusetts had a rule that thisas not the final order. it could be revisited. they could come back to it ler >> what if the state had a rule that the foremanas two signed a verdict in blue ink. he signed it in black ink. and the judge, you kno it's supposed to be blue ink,o back then one of the jurors changes their mind. is that rule of state law sufficient to constitute a determinion o when jeopardy wasernated? >> yeah. >> you think i is? >> i think if they hav a procedural rule that has to b complied with and by the time i was complied with the jury is not unanimous, i think the general presumption would be, yes, it is fine. >> a frivolous rule that should not impede the federal law determination? >> as this court has said many mes in many contexts whether it be ppey or last year in the electionsecse, at some point as a state rule, it is so outside the bounds of sort of normal rea

>> no, we're underweight the market cap of that because it's in the smit index. we're underweight in the stock but we own it. >> fortnet, stephanie link, good for you on that, because she owns the stock she's talked about it a lot. the run-on effect in some of the other names is extraordinary crowdstrike, palo alto, check point. there's fortinet off its highs of the day if you show crowdstrike and palo alto, that leads me to joe you sold one-third of crowd strike >> i did >> the stock is up 120% since you bought it last august. >> correct >> august of '23 >> again, this is an intuitive observation from an individual which is probably going to be wrong. >> don't say that. >> listen, i believe in cyber security i believe in cyber security. we have checkpoint, palo alto network in the strategy. we had fortinet. sold out of fortinet congratulations to stephanie, up 9% i am overweight cyber security, and i think longer term that's exactly how you want to be the strategy was buying checkpoint, was buying palo alto in october those were great buys. i was able to buy cro

so far, jack smit and the judge are eager to move forward.h, the court does say ok, there's no immunity ——jack smith, i'm sceptical... immunity -- jack smith, i'm sceptical- - -_ immunity -- jack smith, i'm sceptical... immunity -- jack smith, i'm scetical... , , , sceptical... just very quickly. in our sceptical... just very quickly. in your mind. _ sceptical... just very quickly. in your mind, this _ sceptical... just very quickly. in your mind, this could _ sceptical... just very quickly. in your mind, this could go - sceptical... just very quickly. in your mind, this could go back. sceptical... just very quickly. in | your mind, this could go back to sceptical... just very quickly. in - your mind, this could go back to the trial court and could proceed. 0r trial court and could proceed. or what everything just pause? everything pauses now while the supreme court considers it. if they don't take the case, goes on. before ou no, don't take the case, goes on. before you go. we — don't take the case, goes on. before you go. we have _ don't ta

smit now, even though jeff smith hase been given a lot of discretioneh that policy rests with main justice. e atto and i think the attorney general himself really should sign off on departing from that policy. estion so there's a lot of questions here. but jeff smith seeing a loss of calendar space and for him,sn it's significant. >> every day he loseificant.s, o reduces the likelihood that he can get a triaod getl through bn the election. >> and it one of his argumentsss was that this has broad implications in terms of the country you talked about and i've heard other attorneys as well make the argument that maybe the president's attorneys were very broa ybe e d. >> their their definition of immunity can. >> they modify those arguments, fine, tuned them, if you will. >> yeah, i expect that some i of these justices are as concerned with the lower court's decisione lowe ann lack of clarity as to when a president can on immunity. >> so even if they may agree with the resule t, they may not agree with the logic or rationale of ther ra lower. for but the real danger here for jeff smith is once

that's up to jack smit that dehh but the only difference seems to us to be the cooperation issu, e one. they don't really say they think trump had sufficient state of mind to violate the law. as you say, chris biden has actually committed violations of these classified regulations fons of thr much longer period. i was actually quite shocked to hear that he'd been keepingqe from much longer than before he was president or viceyears as president going back to his years as a senator. there's no reason he shoul.d have that information. yeah, and that's exactly what do said. >> john yoo, thank you for coming on. we appreciate your insight weyours. >> thanks, chase. well, our next guest is callin g on members of the president's cabinet to explore the use of the 25th amendment and remove president biden from office. let's brin and g in republicanro representative from new york, claudia tenney. congresswoman, thank you for coming on. we appreciate it. breaking the news here. we apprecibreaki why it is that you think that that it's important now you to toimpn use the 25th amendment to try remov