for guess makes anna nicole smith smith a star. >> va-va-voom. she was ridiculed, but there's a whole story the public doesn't know. >> people have a perception that she was this dumb blond. she wasn't. >> i'm fine, i'm well, i'm here. >> every single thing i touch has a story to it. >> she snagged a very rich man who was near death. >> one of the world's richest men. >> anna never gave [ bleep ] about money. she loved mr. marshall tremendously. >> he left her nothing. zero. >> she is one hot mess, except maybe she's not that hot anymore. >> make me beautiful dress. >> anna nicole smith just gave birth to a baby girl only to have her 20-year-old son daniel die at her maternity bedside. and then the unimaginable happens -- anna herself dies just five months later. >> reporter: the question of why no one called 911 sooner is never fully answered. >> do you know what this even is? >> i thought it would be important to show dannielynn a little bit about where her mom came from. >> there you are with your mommy. >>> she wanted a little girl to treat l

smith and. and dickey says, you know, i remember that when she first came to lancaster, fattiest even told everybody in their circles, when you talk to her, this is a black woman, when you talk to her, you call her mrs. smith. you don't call her by her first name. she ain't lydia to you. and and dickey when when he when he sent for her, he would just refer as smith. he said, sir smith should fix him up and send him off that night. meaning, dear gettysburg. oh yeah. we have some. other 20th centu hers. woodrow wilson who said the -- exalted. exalted. doing on time were the states from his governance included in their name until the whites who were real citizens got co again. he actually screened the birth the nation at the white house this horrific celebrthe ku klux klan. and how did they manage to work that out? well, it turns out thomas dixon and woodrow wilson went to school together at johns hopkins university in baltimore. so ugly birds, a feather stick together. another columbia university

smith. let me just offer a couple of initial thoughts and disclaimer hours before we begin. my talk tonight, which is which i have entitled defining lydia hamilton smith is based largely this book through a ess plug right here, anmon woman and tom's already giving you the rest of the title the goal of my book was to capture they dimensions of mrs. smith. and i think just from tom's brief introduction, you, you gnize that she had a lot of dimensions. and the book received, m happy to say, has received some very favorable reviews. one local review wasn't so favorable, but pretty much everelse was. and in my favorite one so far is is from barry olmsted. he writes, he did a review for library journal and he says, among other things, kelly seeks to do for smith. what annette gordon-reed did for the hemings family in the hemings is a month slow, which is to provide a biography of a figure given only glancing attention in the annals of history that captures it. that's what i to do. and it took it t

>> that he would kill gavin smith.is a powerful thing, isn't it? in 2012, they were separated, but still living together and gavin and lisa were separated too and that old magnetic force, gavin met chandy on that secluded road. >> did the two of you become romantic? >> guess. >> did that include kissing? >> yes. >> while you were kissing gavin, did something happen that caught your attention? >> yeah. >> what happened? >> something just popped up and appeared. >> was that something the defendant, john creech? >> yes. >> gavin didn't have a chance, she said. >> he repeatedly punched him in the face. i wanted to get away. i was scared. >> but before she drove away, she looked back. >> john had gavin panned down. >> later she said creech wanted him to drive to the crime scene and she refused to go closer and drop creech off. >> why didn't you take a month away back to the scene? >> i was afraid of what i would see. >> gavin was dead by then and the prosecutor said, creech was not going to the hospital. he was setting out

but jack smith is not giving up. so explain how he's able to refile those indictments. >> absolutely, kristen, good to chat with you. my understanding is that jack smith is trying this case again with making a few alterations. a few charges have been dropped, but not a lot of the major central charges. and he's basically trying to circumvent this supreme court ruling that said that jack smith could not move this case forward because the evidence presented was coming from trump's so-called official duties when he was president. but jack smith thinks he can still get a guilty verdict on trump for these crimes without having to use the evidence that the supreme court deemed was not admissible. >> so how did he tweak it so that this is more about trump's actions as candidate, which doesn't get that broad immunity versus you know, his role as president? >> yeah. my understanding is he had to take away some of the communications that were deemed official communications in particular. there was a lot of folks in trump's cab

smith never was.en, gave him unlimited power to prosecute a former president. gave him the kind of authority reserved only for senate confirmed us attorneys. smith was never confirmed to anything, so that violates the constitution's appointments clause, because the attorney general is not allowed to use the legislative right of congress and the separation of powers which are cherished. liz: jack smith seems like he's arguing tradition. the tradition of special counsels, right? but you know, they should not be getting unlimited funding that congress never appropriated or approved that's going around the constitutional authority of congress so that's another reason why judge aileen cannon tossed out the classified documents case. the bottom line is that it's doubtful jack smith can get judge canon removed from the christ. she's citing justice clarence thomas his opinion on the trump immunity case. he went out of his way to also question jack smith's appointment as unlawful. he has no lawful standing or

let me read one other part from jack smith.because you're not in charge of certifying your own win or loss but saying he had a personal interest as a candidate being named winner of the election. what do you think jack smith is saying back to the supreme court? i remind viewer -- >> yeah but the one thing -- >> let me finish one thought. >> yes. >> david, i want to say the supreme court was trying to help trump but they left the door open they could have said we tossed the whole thing we're the supreme court. but they did a split and jack smith answers saying give me a break, he was a candidate at the insurrection he wasn't a government official dealing with his own loss. >> that's a great point because a big chunk of this superceding indictment focuses on vice president and the president's efforts to have him play a role that he didn't really have other than ceremonial in the senate to reject the electors. that as well as his speech on the ellipsis was really, as jack smith said, okay, guess what, he wasn't acting as president

i mean, i think it's a smart tactical move by jack smith. but half of the case or so, maybe more just fell away against donald trump that said, he's not going to be satisfied. he's still going to argue the whole case should be dismissed. i think that argument will be rejected by the district court, but the supreme court said donald trump's still can appeal that meaning to the dc court of appeals and then potentially back to the supreme court before trial. so there's no way phil, that we get through that whole appeals process and still started trial between now and november 5. i mean, that's just not going to happen. all right. elie honig, stick with us. we got a lot more to get to on this we want to go back to cnn's kaitlan poll answers continued digging through this kaitlan. what are you seeing right now? what stood out to you as you've had some more time with it, will fell as elie is saying, one of the things here is that the prosecutors really are trying to refocus this around the private things that donald trump was doing, either as a ca

[music playing] narrator: denita smith probably never saw it coming, one shot, >>> denita smith nevert coming, one shot with a clean hit from behind the killer was apparently lying in wait on the apartment second floor landing as denita watt down the stairs from her third-floor unit said durham police detective sean pate. >> there were four apartments on the landing, i think someone was there, there were knocking on the door. >> so denita would have to have walked right past. >> to go down the steps and that is her. >> denita murdered and executed and, it made no sense. her bff said that denita didn't have any enemies. >> denita was a light in the dark world she had a beautiful spirit she was loving and she was kind and she embodied everything about supporting people. >> there was nobody that didn't like her. >> she was realistic and well loved >> especially by her fiance, jermeir stroud who appeared devastated . >> we all cried. he didn't say a whole lot. >> jermeir and denita had met back in college and became the it couple on campus. >> they had been dating for a few years and befo

. >> reporter: tonight, special counsel jack smith filing a new indictment against former president donald trump for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, a direct response to the recent supreme court ruling on presidential immunity. that ruling granting presidents sweeping immunity for virtually all official acts of the executive branch. so, smith went back to the drawing board, now prosecuting trump for what he allegedly did in his role as a candidate, not as president of the united states. the new indictment charges trump with the same four crimes, including conspiracy to defraud the united states, to obstruct the certification of the electoral votes on january 6th, and "conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one's vote counted." but there are some changes in the wake of that supreme court ruling which determined a president is "entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts." the new indictment removes any mention of trump's alleged behavior that prosecutors believe could be considered official acts. for example, it no longer

>> i thought that was really a good argument that jack smith's team made.d it's the sort of argument that doesn't get a lot of traction necessarily in the district court, which is so concerned about the case in front of it, but it gets a lot of play in the higher courts because they're thinking about how expansive is this ruling if we do this? how impactful is this going to be? the notion that inferior officers cannot be appointed to do things that are even semi independent across the federal government would be a disaster. as you said in all of these departments, you have inferior officers who are appointed pursuant to these statutes without having to be affirmed by confirmed by the senate. and so it's not just a special counsel jack smith problem is not just a doj problem. if the 11th circuit and ultimately the supreme court does what trump wants them to do. it's an entire executive branch problem. so i think that was a good argument and i think the 11th circuit will consider there that seriously. >> all right. jen rodgers. thank you. up next right here o

smith has to accommodate his indictment to that case, and there's two elements to it. one is the acts themselves and of course the other is what evidence can be used. he's properly taken out. the communication with jeff clark, the court said specifically that that could not be used as evidence there's another issue here which is the obstruction of an official proceeding. there's an additional case, fischer case that sheds some doubt on whether that statute can be utilized, even though the plain language is clear, the supreme court rewrote the law, essentially went beyond what the statute said. so maybe that case can be made, will see as the additional evidence comes in, but clearly, the judge has to have an evidentiary hearing to find out what is the evidence supporting the slimmed down indictment. but i mean, one thing is abundantly clear. >> the former president's summoned a mob to washington. >> knowing they were armed he said all right, i think we're having trouble with the congresswoman's audio yet we've lost her. we will try to get her back lots of discuss on thi

written's matthew hudson smith going for gold.— smith going for gold. he is.bit before him some - smith going for gold. he is. a i little bit before him some other brits in action here. alastair chalmers, he will be about to take to the track for the a00 metre hurdles semifinals. then there are three british women in the a00 metre semifinals, victoria r who grew... the highlight of this evening from otb tmg perspective, such high hopes for smith, given that he is the fastest man in the world this year over the distance, a european record holder and won his semifinal with ease. he spoken openly in recent times about the mental, physical and financial struggles he has been through in recent years. but he says that running is what brings him fun and allows them to express himself. he also said in a bbc interview before these games that he really wanted to make his nephew proud and give him something to boast about to all his friends back in wolverhampton. we will see how he does tonight. a bit of history for you, the last british man to win the olympic a00 metres

this is not really a great moment for jack smith. that is slimming it down because of the way the immunity ruling came out. it's not a win at all at this point. what to see how that hearing goes? norm was talking about kaitlan on that note about the vice former vice president's role. >> that's something you mentioned as well. so essentially, as far as i understand, jack smith is now talking about mike pence, not as vice president, but as the president of the senate. and that there therefore is not part of the that is not part of trump's official relationship with his vice president. that's more a campaign issue. is that right? >> a campaign issue or actually alex, it's that mike pence under the constitution the way that the prosecutors are framing this is part of a different branch of government. on january 6, he's part of the legislative branch overseeing congress. and so that is how they're trying to make sure that the bubble isn't so wide over pence that they can't use him at all. now, this is one of those things that the judge is

jack smith didn't ask for that today. that is not surprising to me.when i was at the justice apartment, my role in the solicitor general's office was to solicit requests from prosecutors and uniformly say we are not going to do that. we don't ever, we have too many cases before too many judges. whenever single a judge out. it is the rarest thing ever to try to seek a judges removal. sometimes courts will do it on their own, including appeals court. that very well may have been here but that is not something that smith is going to ask for. you have to get the solicitor general's approval and i suspect he wouldn't ask for something like that. and october hearing by the supreme court. if they hear the case, my gut feeling would be they wouldn't hear the case but this thing will fizzle at the end of, it will be one vote with justice thomas but i don't see other votes for it. i think this would be the end of the road sometime in the winter or spring coming up. >> neal katyal and andrew weissman, great to have you back. thank you very much for starting off

i can see why jack smith wants this in.s really is the heart of the whole case, getting mike pence to block the certification. it's a very important part of the narrative, i think, and so they'll litigate it and figure whether this is in or out. >> chief justice in the majority opinion on this case wrote whenever the president and vice president discuss their official responsibilities, they engage in official conduct. it seems like it's going to be a high burden to meet to overcome the presumption of immunity if they're not able to, does jack smith have a case without the conversations with vice president mike pence? >> i think so. you're right. this is going to be litigated and we're going to see a decision on this, probably ultimately by the supreme court. even without the mike pence evidence, however, i think the narrative is a little less complete, but there is still evidence of donald trump -- allegations of donald trump pressuring state officials to change their slate of electors, organizing fake slates of electors an

the issue will be whether she is helped by jack smith position on friday where jack smith says yes, i'm willing to do that or whether jack smith says no, let's do this after the general election. >> and so as it goes forward and as judge chutkan decides 31 process or the other what she's allowing to go forward, that trump is going to a motion to dismiss anything in the indictment, she is going to say no and then they are going to appeal it to the supreme court. >> yes about it will be hard for them to appeal it prior to that factual hearing. there's no question that they can delay the ultimate trial, again, if kamala harris wins. they can be going back to the supreme court for an additional ruling. this could take a lot of time. one way i look at this is if donald trump wins, we know this is absolutely going. if kamala harris wins, at least there is a chance it will go forward. it may take some time. but, that hearing we are you will hear additional evidence and there will be new material for the public to digest about donald trump and what he was up to so that something for us to go on

so labour i put iain duncan smith back in? the wa i think put iain duncan smith back in?ther have iain duncan smith than faiza. ., , , , rather have iain duncan smith than faiza. .,, ,, ., ., faiza. people were upset about that locall . i faiza. people were upset about that locally- i know _ faiza. people were upset about that locally. i know i _ faiza. people were upset about that locally. i know i have _ faiza. people were upset about that locally. i know i have said _ faiza. people were upset about that locally. i know i have said this i faiza. people were upset about that locally. i know i have said this to i locally. i know i have said this to ou, i locally. i know i have said this to you. i don't _ locally. i know i have said this to you, i don't think _ locally. i know i have said this to you, i don't think it _ locally. i know i have said this to you, i don't think it is _ locally. i know i have said this to you, i don't think it is that i locally. i know i have said this to j you, i don't think it is that stupid a calculation by them. they got one extra tory mp b

smith covina nicola is back awesome. out of the finger at terminix path, living in the south of spain realized his dream of bringing back to like the fantastic 3 wheeled vehicle with both the combustion hands and the electric session and the feeling to drive it is c. o for tennessee. it's house call high for the plan and so go into the car, the coffee, it is like a, a plane to open sides. right? so the cookie load seats behind pilot. so it's a little airplane on the road. the caffeine and all that was originally developed in germany by put send in 1948. he joined forces in 1952 with very mister schmidt. a year later, the eccentric creation was presented to the public. in 1956, mister smith were allowed to make plains again and soon lost interest. in the convenience of that project. they sold the woods to send who set up with a combo, the code slots like one machine involving fun, by the end of the production run in 1964. and this will move in 40000 mess. estimate micro costs were produced because even while that remains

yes, an interesting move by smith.her option would be to let judge chutkan make rulings on what the indictment cons stated official acts that had to be thrown out. when i discussed this with experts after he learned this was a possibility, why would jack smith investigate himself. when you look at the indictment, it's the bearbarest minimum her. what constitutes official acts particularly that section where donald trump is accused of violating the law trying to get the justice department to investigate bogus claims of flawed. that is entirely gone. the supreme court in their opinion said this was clearly an official act, the president talking to his justice department. there are elements that remain including donald trump's efforts to get mike pence to delay the certification. we can only guess why jack smith felt that was appropriate to leave in. mike pence was not acting as the vice president, he was acting as the president of the senate in a ceremonial role. those are the things they have to hash out again, this is

we don't know it's a grand jury specific to jack smith. i want to go back to the statement you were reading from a few moments ago. i believe that statement says that while the grand jury had not previously heard evidence related to the case, that this was not necessarily a grand jury just for this. it just says, presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in the case. i'm not sure this grand jury was specific to this case. it could have been a grand jury already convened in the ordinary course of business and the federal district of the district of columbia. that's federal court in washington, d.c. >> it is a reminder that accountability is happening on parallel tracks here. while this one track will not happen in the timely fashion that many people wanted to see it in, it proceeds, nonetheless. >> wheels of justice keep turning. for donald trump it's a reminderer to him that he needs to get elected to get away from it all. it's an important reminder that we have to remember that this is a president who has, heret

so, smith went back to the drawing board, now prosecuting trump for what he allegedly did in his role as a candidate, not as president of the united states. the new indictment charges trump with the same four crimes, including conspiracy to defraud the united states, to obstruct the certification of the electoral votes on january 6th, and "conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one's vote counted." but there are some changes in the wake of that supreme court ruling which determined a president is "entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts." the new indictment removes any mention of trump's alleged behavior that prosecutors believe could be considered official acts. for example, it no longer describes trump's alleged efforts to enlist justice department officials to subvert the election. and it no longer details how multiple federal officials, including the director of national intelligence, told trump his claims of election fraud were false. what smith has done instead is focus on trump as the leader of his campaign, highlig

smith will start day 3, on 72. he'll have gus atkinson alongside him.do will be hoping for another fruitful day after taking 3 for 68 so far in the innings. it's also day 2 of the first test between pakistan and bangladesh in rawalpindi. the hosts declared on 448—6, thanks to a 1m from saud shakeel and an unbeaten 171 from mohammed rizwan. bangladesh are 27 without loss in reply, trailing by a21 runs. chelsea have a 2—0 lead following the first leg of their conference league playoff with servette. christopher nkunku opened the scoring with a penalty in the second half, to break the deadlock at stamford bridge, before noni madueke doubled their lead with 15 minutes to go. but there was some concern when cole palmer went off injured clutching his hamstring, but boss enzo maresca is hopeful it's not too serious. cole, yeah, he had some. he felt something, but it looks, it looks fine. they already checked him. he looks fine. he looks 0k. so hopefully it's not a it's not any problem. and he can be available for sunday's game. and you can see all the scores f

jack smith was proactive. he adjusted. he looked at the indictment and tried to pull out the offending language that might run afoul of the supreme court's absolute immunity ruling. weirded down from 45 pages to 36 pages, but what i was waiting for and i thought it would come as a result of hearings before judge chutkan, was waiting to see if jack smith believed that in the wake of the absolute immunity ruling from the supreme court some of the charges would have to go away. it's his considered opinion as evidenced by the superseding indictment that all four charges remain viable, provable, and he's going to proceed to trial on all four charges and that's a good day for the prospect of accountability. >> barb, in order to get to a jury of his peers, donald trump will have to survive a motion to dismiss denial by 10 eight. -- judge chutkan. we had an original version of the indictment. it survived a motion to dismiss by donald trump that was filed in front of judge chutkan. it's the same judge. the same indictment went to t

what does that even mean that jack smith shouldn't be anywhere near power? in your view, david i think the j.d. >> vance i'm not going to try to interpret as his his you know, his words you clearly heard him say it. what i think he's trying to say is, you know, ashley pointed out earlier that donald trump is convicted of 34 counts in a new york courtroom by all accounts, even our own fried zakaria said that if his name wasn't donald trump, those those counts wouldn't have been brought i do think there's a great deal of law fair being waged against this former president in this campaign, there were suits initially to keep him off the ballot and many and many states, 14th amendment's suits which all failed the suit in georgia, the suits in new york this suit. so a lot of people just hear white noise. they see the legal system is an extension of the political system, and that's unfortunate because there are some, in some instances, some real justice able issues that need to be tried didn't they get just mattered up in this big morass of politics. it's unfortuna

i think you get a flavor of that in jack smith brief filed today but really only a flavor.ords like nonsensical, misguided, strained, erroneously and i pay good money to read the first draft of this because i think you some words that weren't so restrained and because really truly a first-year law student could dismantle judge cannon's opinion and even a prelaw student and you don't have to go to law school but just for starters and as smith points out the supreme court in the united states in 1974 took the very law that merrick garland is fighting toward the appointment of jack smith and said, yes, this gives you the power to appoint a special counsel and the judge's explanation was, that wasn't necessary to the holding of the case which is to put it mildly, nuts and if anyone should know it, it is her because this decision says, look, the special counsel is appointed illegally and therefore the indictment has to fall apart and he has no authority to issue an indictment in the same thing was true in the nixon case were nixon would say with the subpoena quashed outside of t

but matt hudson—smith is still in the front. can he get there?many people in the world can say that? i've been the bridesmaid twice now! my time is coming. so i'm just happy, i'm grateful. it'sjust a start. yeah, i saw my family. i didn't even know they were here! it's been a hell of a journey, i'm just grateful. earlier, there had been drama on the track involving britain's george mills taking a tumble with the finish line of his 5000 metre heat in sight. eventually finishing 18th, before confronting the frenchman he believed was to blame. but organisers agreed mills was impeded, and he is through to saturday's final. despite heartbreak for hudson—smith, amber anning gave herself a chance of a second medal of the games. having already won relay bronze, she ran a personal best to make the 400 metre final — propelled, she said, by british support and the pride of trying to add to team gb's growing tally on the track. it wasn't just here at the athletics that there was gripping action all the way to the line, as the same was true in the velodrome.

check -- jack smith has his own obligations.nder doj rules he's obligated to consult with a number of different components and have everyone sign off on his final strategy. that is a really cumbersome part of being at the justice department. he is subject to the same rules i had to live with as a u.s. attorney. this is the same for a special counsel. it can be frustratingly slow, but when you have had some of the smartest legal minds in the country looking at your strategy, chewing on the decisions he makes about how to handle his case after this devastating supreme court decision, he will come out on the other end with a great strategy that is anticipating all of the potential problems nt of the government's case to move forward. >> that is something i had posted on social myself, this idea that jack smith is gaming out all the different permutations of what could happen if he took this particular position versus maybe this one versus another one, and the idea is, the ramifications of this immunity really do not just affect one

jack smith is a very hardcharging prosecutor.hat he wanted to actually meet this deadline and not ask for more time, but the department of justice is a very large place with a lot of moving pieces and a lot of people with a lot of different equities and how to handle this supreme court decision in merrick garland, the attorney general, is a very thoughtful and very cautious person, and i suspect it probably was a bit of a tug-of-war as to how to handle this in the timing. here's the big picture, though. the downside of the delay is that to the extent the people think there could be a hearing, a factual hearing where we hear from witnesses, the more there is a delay, the less likely that's going to happen before the election. >> so then andrew, let me get your take on this tweet from george washington university law professor randall eliasson who tweeted, could he, meaning jack smith, need more time because he is preparing a superseding indictment adding trumps co-conspirators as defendants? that would be smart. what do you think

and by doing so, what jackson smith has done. the judge here's a cleaner version of the indictment. now let's move forward with that and we can anticipate a motion to dismiss from donald trump moving forward. >> paul, how do you see this new indictment? >> i think this is a bold strategic move by jack smith to say that he can prosecute and win this case, even within the super limited confines of the supreme court's immunity decision. what everybody had been expecting is that on friday both sides would file papers about whether and how the case should go forward, and then next week judge chutkan would hold a hearing, go line by line through the indictment what could stay and what had to go with regards to the new supreme court decision. what we didn't know, jack smith secretly impaneled this new grand jury which produce add superseding indictment that streamlines the whole process. as was said, a lot more the same than is different between these two new indictments but i think jack smith felt he needed a new grand jury indictment

he calls them deranged jack smith has brought this ridiculous new indictment against me.t's merely an attempt, quote: to interfere with the election. i want to just play this soundbite from sandra smith talking to supreme court neil gorsuch about that immunity decision. take a listen. >> this is the first time in american history that one presidential administration was seeking to bring criminal charges against a predecessor. there's a precedent of the united states supreme court called nixon vs. fitzgerald in which the court said civil cases can't be brought against the president presumptively in his official capacity after he leaves office. why? because that would chill him from exercising the powers and duties of the president while he is president. >> so, jonathan, if this goes forward, and if, let's say, the former president doesn't succeed in court, we are still talking about months, if not years of dealing with this specific case, that the special counsel is bringing forward. >> well, i think that the supreme court will still have problems with this indictment. it

ruling that makes it clear what smith says. we'll hold under the supreme court's immunity decision 55 years. so to bolster his claim that this revised indictment holds and is consistent with that supreme court ruling granting broad immunity to presidents smith added new sections to try to show that trump's acts on january 6 were unofficial. on official is the crucial word that the supreme court used to say to say that unofficial acts of a sitting president can be prosecuted. so smith went back, looked at it and said, all right, i'm going to show you how these counts that could send someone to prison for 55 years were an official in one new section. he does that by writing quote throughout the conspiracies, although the defendants sometimes used his twitter account to communicate with the public as president about official actions and policies. he also regularly used it for personal purposes including to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud, exhort his supporters to travel to washington, dc on january 6 pressure the v

what this move from jack smith now means. >>> also tonight, we're tracking this dangerous heat for millions. severe storms now from the midwest into the northeast on the way. >>> and the deadly accident at the atlanta airport. what we've learned. >>> first tonight, this new revised indictment against donald trump in the election interference case. how it's different from the original one, and could it affect the election? >>> also, we're tracking the dangerous heat from the midwest moving into the east. records set in chicago. the feel like reading, 115 degrees. the nation's largest power grid operator with a new warning tonight. and this heat now fueling severe storms. large hail, damaging winds. moving into the northeast. ginger zee has the forecast. >>> the deadly airport horror. two workers killed, a third seriously injured inside a hangar. the deadly wheel rupture. >>> in the northeast, the mosquito concern now turning deadly. a moesktd mosquito-borne virus killing one person in new hampshire. the massachusetts town taking action. the spraying in new york city. authorities in several s

even though sandy smith was black. black woman. and so in any it's a it's a they think they may have targeted at certain leaders of the movement including sandy. so they say it's not racial animus. political animus. right. because you're a communist. this is the reason why this happened. and so no one is convicted ultimately, they do a civil case. they're able to win a civil case because one of the members of the workers party is not a member of the communist workers party. that's saying, well, because you're not communists, we can't use political animus to justify your killing. right? so they are able to get some money for that. but the involved keep doing movement work, but we think less of an activism, right? they're active. a stop doesn't stop when they stop being students right. they she remained in greensboro politics right after. she graduates and when she dies been a college student are like, well, why didn't we know her right. and so at the end years later, they've done like many demonstrations every year. they do a demons

team gb's dina asher—smith and daryl neita finished 11th and 5th in the womens 200 metres final.by thomas ran away with the gold medal. silver went to st lucia's 100 metre championjulien alfred. the usa's brittany brown just edged out asher—smith for bronze i was confident going into the race and i did not realise i hadn't won the race until i crossed the line and i knew i would have to execute until the finish and had an olympic champion in the lane next to me and the race wasn't over until it was over. team gb�*s mathew hudson smith is the favourite to take gold in the final of the 400 metres later. he looked very impressive in comfortably winning his semi—final against a field that included former world champion, michael norman. if hudson smith can win he'll become britain's first male 0lympic 400 metres champion since eric liddell — of chariots of fire fame. in the velodrome, the dutch smashed their own world record twice in defending their team sprint title, outclassing great britain in the final. roy van den berg, harrie lavraysen and jeffrey hoogland were the same three th

smith about those color variations. ions and the rings are sufficient to put the possibilities that could account for the kind of differences. is it does it imply these are quite different minerals or have they been exposed different kinds of things? well, that's that's what we don't really understand. all we see is a surface of that could mean different composition among the particles between the ring, sea ring, or it could be a purely superficial effect happens to the ring particles, perhaps color or color dislocations in the in the crystal structure that the due to high energy particle bombardment, slowly cause the surface of the particles different in the two ring systems. but this method, as fellow scientists, were sure of one thing. now, you know, accounting rings and voyager one, we had estimated that there were hundreds, perhaps even up to thousand. now we're getting higher resolution and we're finding that many of the rings that we're seeing the part where single rings in the voyager one photography are now tur

dina asher-smith is in line enough just now. dina asher-smith is in line for the — enough just now.smith is in line for the macro. in _ enough just now. dina asher-smith is in line for the macro. in the _ enough just now. dina asher-smith is in line for the macro. in the final- in line for the macro. in the final ofthe in line for the macro. in the final of the women's _ in line for the macro. in the final of the women's 200 _ in line for the macro. in the final of the women's 200 metres, - in line for the macro. in the final. of the women's 200 metres, british hopes rested with dina asher—smith and darryl neita, hoping to land theirfirst individual and darryl neita, hoping to land their first individual medals. the favourite was the inform american gabby thomas and she soon showed why. gabby thomas and she soon showed wh . ,, , gabby thomas and she soon showed wh _ ,, , , ., ., gabby thomas and she soon showed wh . ,, , , ., ., , gabby thomas and she soon showed why. she is starting to pull away. timeous from alfred! _ why. she is starting to pull away. timeous from alfred! gabby -

special counsel jack smith filed this. this is the new indictmentnd now all in its 36 pages, it indict trump for january 6. so you might when yeameay that be a surprisedoes tmp thinking, didn't the supreme court say that trump had immunity and shoot this entire case down, went into the garbage. well, yes. except in this indictment, smith says, it's going to hold up to the supreme court's immunity ruling. it is not as long. okay. like i mentioned, 36 pages, the original indictment that smith had filed that fell to the immunity decision from the supreme court was 45 pages but. 36 pages is still a lot in this smith's stands by the four original crucial counts that trump faced, which include conspiracy to defraud the united states. so this is crucial to emphasize those four core charges are still there just to make the significance clear, we looked it up and the maximum prison sentence of those four counts combined the maximum is 55 years in prison. ruling that makes it clear what smith says. we'll hold under the supreme court

trump calling smith's action quote, an act of desperation and ridiculous. and he's demanding that the case be immediately dismissed. the new indictment underscores the immense personal significance of a trump victory come this november, if he returns to the white house, he would have the authority to shut down this case and another federal case, the classified documents case against him. let's bring in cnn's alayna treene. alayna, what comes next with this indictment and how's the trump campaign responding? >> well, look the trump campaign is fighting exactly the way that you would expect them to donald trump had sent a series of posts on this last night including into this morning calling this a hoax, saying that this is election interference. he noted that early voting starts in just ten days, i believe on september 6. and so that's what they're sayisaying about this that, jac smith and his team are using this as a way to interfere in the upcoming election. all the things we have heard him say repeatedly luck what comes next? i mean i think there's a lot

i it's clearly aearln effort too more on election interference from jack smith.hould be ashamed him -- of himself. >> summer cheering it on.e >> it isch a slick move. >> because of the slow nature of our justice system, this is as conversation we are still having >> the 60 day rule is not actually a rule it's a norm, a practice. >> it's not written in law or something that is written in stone, it's a policy orrt guideline of sortss,.>> >> once a case has begun, what's the prosecution has commenced,it it can continue to do so uph through anand including and beyd election day.id >> she said it i wasn't a rule,h the norm and i thought we were going to be turned to norms. >> it is a rule, it's 985.500. federal prosecutors and agentsma may never select the timing of any action including an best gey of steps and criminal charges for the purpose of affecting an election or for the purpose ofeu getting an advantage from onein side tg o the other.it whether it's 90 days or 60 days, this has been a rule that every attorney general has affirmed and reaffirmed since george b

when she met john smith and at some point her father, powhatan, was to execute john smith. but pocahontas cast herself over john's missed body and saved him from being executed by her father. well, that's another that's good story, right? i mean, that's a cool story and it makes for great myth. so much so that you know virginians to this day love to trace their their they're ancestry back to so at this point course there are thousands of people who can with at least some credible tea, connect themselves to pocahontas and offspring john rolfe. so this story about pocahontas saving john rolfe or john smith well probably happen in fact in almost certainly didn't happen. and the way we know that is john smith the only source we have for that story is a that john smith wrote about himself. and we all know are you favorite to the author, shall we say? and it turned that this had happened to john smith, not but twice, and that during his travels the very same thing happened to him somewhere in in the arab territories and some lovely princess once again saved john smith from being