did it make me feel better to send out a snarky tweet? maybe.uld i have felt better tweeting without my pants? we should ask our guest. kt would i have felt better if i was tweeting without my pants on? >> it depends on what you were feeling. >> is that the first time you have had that question? you seem unprepared. >> that guy had three things he was thinking. number one he gets through the security line much faster than everybody else. he could get there and get a seat. >> nobody else would want that seat after. >> or he was going to make such a scene that everybody would say i'm out of here. i don't want to fly on a plane and that crazy guy. there would be empty seats. or which is what happened, the mothers looked at him and saw what he was doing grabbed their children and ran. he had the plane to himself. i don't see the problem. >> you are in favor of this? andy has this ever happened to you? you fly to the west coast. >> i flew out of l.a.x. last week with no problems whatsoever. sentinel 1 diligence nothing. i pretty much understand anyth

little snarky there, cello lessons. and we have this completely ordinary cylinder... ordinary, yet i sense it is dripping with magical potential. oh, dear lord. a man pops out for a moment to evacuate his bowels and catch up on the adventures of the caped crusader, only to emerge and discover his apartment has been transformed into a cabaret. sheldon, he's just practicing for his cousin's birthday party. as i was saying... empt

is snarkiness an important quality for the future president of the united states of america? >> i think one thing is you have to dial back the warmth. that is a classic trick. if you want to avoid getting in trouble for something when people would say what happened here? if you say that's what i want to know on their side. this idea of -- first of all even my dad doesn't printout e-mails. the idea that that the e-mails are printed out. recan out of paper in paper tray one. it reminds me of someone who needs to be searched for drugs saying i want you to search me. i am just going to be in the bathroom flushing. >> she admitted to deleting 30,000 e-mails. >> those belong to the public. go and find them. >> nobody is more upset than she is that she deleted the e-mails. >> does clinton now not have to speak to the press for another three months? >> she doesn't need to speak to the press until next november. i agree. i don't care she is trolling the press. i care she is trolling the american people, but i don't care she is trolling the press. the response should be stop covering h

quick, snarky right to it. back at you. >> quick and snarky 140 characters or less.ected killer. personal notebooks introduced as evidence in the aurora movie theater shooting trial. >>> and we're going to have this for -- nebraska banning the death penalty. and our pulse question -- should the death penalty be abolished across the country? we're going to influence you probably after you hear the interview with jeremy sheetz. he's coming up and the first person released from nebraska's death row in 2001. headache? motrin helps you be an unstoppable, let's-rock-this-concert- like-it's-1999 kind of mom. back pain? motrin helps you be the side-planking keeping-up-with- your-girlfriend- even-though-you'll-feel-it- later kind of woman you are. body pain? motrin helps you be an unstoppable, i-can-totally-do-this- all-in-one-trip kind of woman. when pain tries to stop you, there's motrin. motrin works fast to stop pain where it starts. make it happen with new motrin liquid gels. your pet... could you love him any more? probably not. but now you can give them even more when

clinton a question and she just gave this snarky little answer in response. just ridiculous. stop it, stop it, stop it. melissa: yeah, lauren what do you think is the impression in larger world to respond to a question? when if she is asked to take questions from media, will she do interview, she said she will write it down and put it on her list and ponder it in that sarcastic tone, what do people think. >> thinks it is not as much of a priority as she saying it is. honestly a lot of people are saying what about our emails? if this can happen to politicians we should be careful what we're writing in our own emails. obviously sort of things we need to see what is in the emails. >> she lied. if "the new york times" story is accurate she lied. melissa: what "the new york times" story, talking about the fact she had been quoted saying, and her people were quoted saying she was only using one specific email. now it turns out due to a time stamp, that she had been using other emails as well. so they're not even necessarily going after the right ones. judy, what do you make of this

and the president was snarky. >> i don't know why you're here, but i'm here because of what happened in syria a a couple of years ago and i'm here because we have extraordinary challenges throughout the region, not just in syria but iraq and yemen and libya and isil and our interests to make sure that we don't have a nuclear weapon in iran. >> okay, so mike, what did the president actually say about the report? >> well, you know, it's interesting. the way that i framed the question to the president, tony, one of the reasons why the summit was called, continuing anxiety and yes frustration and even anger but some of the gulf nations documented after the president did not retaliate militarily after the chemical weapons two years ago, and we know the story there working with national organizations through the good auspices of russia to have those chemical weapons removed, a process that's now ongoing, but a process that's using chorine bombs again against his own people. the president says it's not technically chemical weapons but here's more of what he had to say. >> it's true that we

the snarky person would say every lousy karaoke singer has been on there and they've run out of talentged the way television is being watched. any of those shows you watch. whether skating or dancing or singing, you see their imprint. the money making machine, they'll roll out new programs and new opportunities. but diana is right. they want to quit while they're ahead to maintain the value of the concept. melissa: because they have perfected and maybe started the idea of this contest reality. reality is in all these different categories. this is where you find the winner. there's cooking shows like this and everything else. this same group could do something else. like maybe another music show? >> as i was saying, the whole landscape will probably change. i think we'll look at youtube to find our stars. there's vine stars. there's instagram stars. these people are profiting on how many followers they have. so the whole business model is changing. it's very exciting to watch where our new rising stars are coming from. melissa: absolutely. that sounds bad news for me. i'll race over to

that was snarky.lieve jeb bush has done nothing to convince you he is a better candidate than you would be? >> i like jeb. might have been one of those days where i wanted to say something that was, you know kind of funny. maybe you didn't take it that way. here's the situation. i was the chairman of the budget committee when we balanced the budget in washington. that was the first time since man walked on the moon. i did it with the clinton administration and we got it done. i was also on the armed services committee and involved in military reform, including the most significant reform of the military that many say in 50 years with the goldwater nichols bill. i went into the private sector and i was governor of ohio. we've gone from a state that was dead to a state optimistic and growing. we just announced on friday amazon locating a big facility here in the midwest. we are growing jobs. we've cut the most amount of taxes. with that resume national security, success in washington and success as an e

he is funny, snarky, geeky, a good dancer.he release skewers the stereotype but at the same time, i find him very authentic as a scientist. my only criticism of his television show is that he was not given script writing credit and when i saw the show, it seemed more like a tribute to carl sagan who i love and it didn't have kneels humor -- neil 's kumar. i think they're wonderful role models coming up and put pressure on your politicians. they feel it and they will listen. i am a scientist at nasa and i will respond to your e-mails in the morning. why am i responding to that one person with there are thousands of people who might have a similar question? they got to me. they sent me an e-mail. [applause] >> this has been a panel. what -- an excellent panel. my only regret is there is not a science denier on the panel because i love to hear what they had to say. a lot of what you have said has gone to religious faith and its effect on science denial but i think there is another cynical component to it. i saw a trailerr the oth

he sat there and was snarky. he was absolutely snarky during the entire trial.ost: that is judy from austin, texas. jenny from ohio. you're next. caller: good morning to you. i do not believe in the death penalty. i'm sorry. i do not believe in it. i do not think you should kill people. i think when they do these horrible crimes, put them in a room and let them stay there for the rest of their lives to ride. host: "the new york times" talks about an aide to osama bin laden, receiving a sentence for an attack that took place in the late 90's, saying it was one of bin laden's most trusted aides. one more call on this topic. this will be a win from ohio independent line. caller: good morning. first let me say, what these guys did was horrific. it is inexcusable. i'm not try to justify his back. however, i do have a problem with the death penalty. most of the inconsistency in which the death penalty is reached. it is quite interesting that those who are so in favor of the death penalty are also the people who are so quick to go to war, and also the people who are ag

a little snide, a little snarky. >> i learned from the best. >> i know. >> it's time now for a "cnbc sue herera, what's happening? >>> hi kelly. here's what's happening. senator rand paul has been talking on the senate floor for about three hours now, filibustering to tie up the trade bill. that filibuster can't go on indefinitely because of the rules of debate. the best he can do is to lay the amendment votes on trade until 1:00 p.m. tomorrow. >>> the drug enforcement administration is conducting raids on pharmacies and pain clinics in four states as part of an aggressive crackdown on prescription pain medication abuse. >>> mcdonald's workers protesting outside company headquarters in illinois this afternoon. ahead of the fast food giant's annual shareholder meeting tomorrow. demonstrators are demanding a union for workers and a pay increase of $15 an hour. >>> nfl commissioner roger goodell says his response fwolt hear directly from new england quarterback tom brady and his appeal of his four-game suspension for deflateing footballs, the players' union has called on goodell to recu

>> i mean i kind of want to be snarky and say if they are scared to go. in the streets and walk that's how citizens feel for 50 years. but to answer more appropriately, if you do your job, you have a really good chance of having nothing to worry about. it's not as if the law goes against cops. cops typically get the benefit of the doubt. what police officers are seeing in the last six months around the country is that people are beginning to have some doubts. people aren't always giving police the benefit of the doubt. our police deserve transparency and due process and the rule of law and all the same protections that citizens get. i don't think we should take that away from them because they have a tough job or because of the controversies. but the end of the day, police have to be held accountable just like everybody else. get a body camera and you'll have nothing to worry about. >> your officers wharks are you seeing on the ground in milwaukee? >> well that's the tipping point. it's called policing where officers won't be as assertive if they should.

. >> sending snarky tweets like this to president obama.nd privacy of americans. so you were for privacy before you were against it. and alling on his supporters to stand with rand and throw in some cash. his campaign even selling this filibuster starter pack with a t-shirt that reads, the nsa knows i bought this t-shirt. still, his opponents say he's wrong on the nsa. >> there's nobody engaging on this national conversation other than me who's used these tools. i've used them for seven years now as a prosecutor. what i talk about is actual. >> paul's campaign says voters want a candidate with coherent views and that he's the only republican running who's willing to learn from america's mistakes in the middle east. we expect to see paul once again in action on the senate floor sunday night when the senate comes back to try to pass an extension before they expire at midnight. >> thanks very much. let's bring in our chief political analyst cnn politics reporter and our cnn political director. is it really rand paul versus the rest of the repu

he is funny, snarky, geeky, a good dancer.he release skewers the stereotype but at the same time, i find him very authentic as a scientist. my only criticism of his television show is that he was not given script writing credit and when i saw the show, it seemed more like a tribute to carl sagan who i love and it didn't have kneels humor -- neil 's kumar. i think they're wonderful role models coming up and put pressure on your politicians. they feel it and they will listen. i am a scientist at nasa and i will respond to your e-mails in the morning. why am i responding to that one person with there are thousands of people who might have a similar question? they got to me. they sent me an e-mail. [applause] >> this has been a panel. what -- an excellent panel. my only regret is there is not a science denier on the panel because i love to hear what they had to say. a lot of what you have said has gone to religious faith and its effect on science denial but i think there is another cynical component to it. i saw a trailerr the oth

he's funny snarky, come a good dancer. i love dancing. i'm a dancing fuel. the same time i find him very very authentic as a scientist. my only criticism is that neil was not giving script writing credit. when i saw the show it seemed like a tribute to carl sagan who i've loved and it didn't have neil's bite. it didn't have neil's humor. i wish they would've given more free range. there are some wonderful role models coming up and also put pressure in your politicians. they feel it. they will listen to that. here i am a scientist at nasa. i will respond to weird e-mails. why do i respond to that one person when there's thousands of people. they got to me. they sent me an e-mail. [applause] >> yep. this has been an excellent panel. my only regret is there is not a science denier on the panel. a lot of what you said has gone to religious faith and its effect on science denial. but i think there is another more cynical component to it. assize trailer at the movies the other day for a term called emergence of doubt that talks about the people that are paid to cy

. >> reporter: he vows to keep blocking the nsa programs sending snarky tweets to president obama.ericans so you were for privacy before you were against it? and calling on his supporters to stand with rand and throw in some cash. his campaign even selling this filibuster starter back with a t-shirt that reads the nsa knows i bought this rand paul t-shirt. still paul's opponents say he's wrong on the nsa. >> there's nobody engaging in this national conversation other than me who has used these tools. i have used them for seven years as a prosecutor. what they talk about is theoretical. what i talk about is actual. >> athena jones, washington. >>> it has been quite a week for senator rand paul. he warned today that he will quote, force the expiration of the nsa illegal spy program. he plans to do that on the senate floor tomorrow night when congress meets for a rare session to try to hash this out before it expires. let's talk about it with mark lamont hill and ben ferguson. ben, let's begin with you. take a look at this statement. this is part of what harry reid said today. quote,