and in some ways, you know, sncc is non-violent.o, of course, the kenyan resistance movement used arm struggle, so they are sort of questioning non-violence but that doesn't mean they are going to engage in armed struggle like the kenyans were. it's an outlet for their evident frustration. ♪ to see your king ♪ before he said what's the matter ♪ ♪ to see the king oding ♪ he looks mightily hard ♪ ♪ freedom now ♪ freedom now >> okay. i just wanted to say, you noticed in the previous slide, there's a picture of the attack on non-violent protesters in selma, alabama, an event which became known as bloody sunday. this was broadcast on national tv on the nightly news, and -- and these marches in some are campaigning for voting rights, and here you have john lewis who is a prominent member of sncc and now congressman from atlanta fell by a state trooper's batons and the song refers to the violence in selma, and this next selection comes from that moment as well. it is a plea, urgent plea for racial understanding by otis redding, and this wa

particularly sncc. just a couple of questions to ponder.relationship between mass media and journalism and popular music changed since the 1960s, and how can studying the civil rights movement help us better understand the continuing significance of race in today's u.s. politics and society? those are a couple of questions to ponder. i hope you've been pondering them. and i just wanted to show you just a brief and incomplete selection of all of the music that was connected to the social movements of the 1960s, the counter culture, the civil rights movement, the student movement. these are all appeals to the conscience of the listener. as i said, it's an incomplete list. i've got some of them in bold face. those are -- those happen to be motown artists. i have a special interest in motown music. nevertheless, that gives you an idea of some of the songs we just heard. many of them songs one can still hear on the radio today. so that is pretty much all i have in the way of songs, and we do have a little over between 15 and 20 minutes and i won

he is trying to regulate our sncc to less than what happens in nature. rsnic to less than what happens in nature. we have had the epa go as far to an attempt to make it almost impossible for small printing water systems to comply with these regulations. we have a system of people at the epa, and i like them a lot, that are trying to regulate industry out of existence. i am talking about small water systems in small communities. we probably have better water than most large communities, but our are cynic might not fall within the categories. you cannot maintain it at less than what happens in nature, and that is what epa is trying to do. host: let's get a response from gene karpinski. guest: nobody wants unhealthy levels in our drinking water. in the clean air act, passed in 1970, amended in 1990, they said the job is to look at the science, the law, and the facts, then when you set your standards for pollutants, you follow the science. the scientists decide what level is safe. the epa bases it on what independent scientists find. what is how the process