king when i was doing research for my book on snick. john hope franklin, the great historian of his time recommended me to her. but having said all that, there's just the serendipity of i was -- because at that time, i really believed more in the snick view of bottom up. one of the things about my first book "in struggle" is that it is a story of the movement from the grassroots up. it's not from king's perspective. so that was -- that was my thrust. so i've always wondered why she entrusted me with that mission. because she knew that. she knew that i had written a book and i suspect that she had read it. but i think she understood that even though i came to it with that perspective, i would come with a sympathy for the movement but also i would learn over time. i remember the first paper i gave about -- after becoming editor of martin luther king's paper, it was at a conference at the capitol. and on martin luther king, it was one of the first conferences after the national holiday. so i'm invited to give this very public speech that's

dagen: jonas is this a win for anybody who loves live muis snick. >> all this tech development has beenficial to the consumer which is why the government has stayed out of it. i worry about tech, five tech companies want everything, is all consumption going to be amazon. what are they going to do with all that power? i worry about what that's going towards. dagen: gary b, is this good news? >> yeah, i think it's great news. the bigger point that jonas brings up the fear of technology taking over but what's monopoly these days with netscape, was dell a monopoly, exxon in a monopoly, ebay is a monopoly. you can get your power to your house other than from your local utility, there are no monopolies anymore. it's just too difficult in this age, i think it's great for amazon but don't be competition out there if it doesn't work. dagen: capri. >> ticketmaster is domination for tickets including europe, i'm a music chick,i say bring it on, go ahead, amazon, we want lower prices. dagen: john, final word to you. >> always a great show when john gets called, long way to being a monopoly. gary b

on both sides of the country's political debate escalates it's not clear who's going to be affected snick on the court banning or canceling right wing to rallies and even events featuring conservative speakers has become pretty commonplace within the past few months here in the us. and you know as well as i do that they have a message that we don't believe in the message of hate most recently organizers were compelled to cancel two rallies one in san francisco and the other in berkeley i left has made another appearance in berkeley california planned to end time marxism rally on sunday was canceled because of fears of west wing violence those fears turned out to be justified. but was. ok it wasn't working space to stay back earlier this month the free speech rally in boston was labeled a white nationalist gathering despite denials by the events organizers we don't need to say but my message is clear to this group we don't want you we don't want you to comment now with hate speech accusations being thrown around the us remains the only modern democracy in the world without a legal definiti

even do very modest medicaid reform how tackle social security and medicaid more politically toxin snickcially entitlement, don't expect to get it back. and i will be personal here. . what 2 hell is my wife and i do getting 4,000 dollars a month from federal government for social security? you are right, i am stealing from you, worse i am stealing from your children. >> you paid into it. >> that is nonsense i bought i buy car insurance, too i buy fire insurance i didn't get premiums back may be that is how it was sold 70 years ago, but your money getting back that is not so i've got more than my money back. >> should there be for those who don't need it cut. >> it absolutely. get rid of it i have a simple rule if you own two homes ineligible for social security. >> a good rule. >> that is politicians are lying to american people, we talk about this, you know whos do talk about medicare and social security looming entitlement crisis we do on this very program it gets brought up -- more than once a week, i tell my parents, this, they are taking more out of medicare than ever put into medic

supports it i he said i am going to make a statement i am righteous one i think sort of apple thet snicktry to appeal three charges as well as nextera in your life i want to ask you about you launching the start up first timeline term of how this takes place. >> probably something next five months judge will determine whether or not to proceed to sentencing should that occur judge will decide that closer to you know, end of five months meantime we are going there is a lot of legal work to dismiss these i think he ronnous, and some cases not even legal charges, so assuming the judge does proceed to that united states guidelines promulgated by department of justice suggests the amount for a crime is what suggests the sentence, in my case a my investors made four times money so it is very hard to interpret what a sentence should be up to her honorer of course if you read the guidelines the suggest they make zero to six months so i am gratified the large charge that ridiculous conspiracy government contrived proven false what we worried about could have resulted in major sentence, so that is