snyderman. law whicht the requires motions to label price differences as a cash discount rather than a credit card surcharge unconstitutionally restricting speech. this is just over an hour. >> we'll hear argument first this morning. in case 15-1391. expression hair can designs. mr. gupta. >> whether the state can -- this case is about whether the state can criminalize speech the most effect ive effective way. by design new york's law sup presses the message -- >> i'm sorry. you're two groups of petitioners. one wants to give cash price without any information about the sur challenge. the other one i thought wanted to give two separate prices. >> they want to do the same thing. i think what you're referring to is that some of them are doing different things now. one expressions hair design is charging two different prices, one for cash and one for credit. they're trying as hard as they can to describe that as a discount. right now, they're refraining from dual pricing all together. but if we win

like to for the rico 20 act and of course the attorneys general for clean power , led by mister snyderman of new york. this is an attempt now to silence and chill speech through the threat of litigation and prosecution so that's a big thing but one thing, i mean i appreciate this idea of government funding team b or red teams who would look at alternative hypothesis but maybe that's what can be done but ultimately the ideal as far as i'm concerned would be to separate science from state. as much as possible. why is it that we don't have these sorts of controversies in the religious realm? it's because religion is privately funded in the united states. eisenhower in his farewell speech warned of this very problem that we are seeing and a lot of people just remember this as his warning about a military-industrial complex but he also warned about the quote, " steadily increasing share of scientific research that is funded by or at the direction of the federal government and he ." he said that whereas historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery was the free university

snyderman.hicht the requires motions to label price differences as a cash discount rather than a credit card surcharge unconstitutionally restricting speech. this is just over an hour. >> we'll hear argument first this morning. in case 15-1391. expression hair can designs. mr. gupta. >> whether the state can -- this case is about whether the state can criminalize speech the most effect ive effective way. by design new york's law sup presses the message -- >> i'm sorry. you're two groups of petitioners. one wants to give cash price without any information about the sur challenge.