heating prices in switzerland have proposed lowering the temperature in homes to save gas, the social democratic partye a statement. after, as electricity providers announced plans to raise the cost of their services by 47% next year german farmers demand higher food prices, as stated by the head of rosa farmers. this is the only way to save the country's agricultural industry for the sanction, having to pay with layoffs and ruins of the german chemical concern, the bases in which in 2019, in the wake of the crisis, laid off 6,000 employees , are preparing to lay off six times as many people, the reason for the lack of an alternative to russian hydrocarbons. development of the hunting industry not only was it discussed at the palace of independence , alexander lukashenko received a report from the deputy prime minister and the head of the belarusian society of hunters and fishermen the day before. former leader. the ministry of internal affairs of igor shunevich has been working in this position for more than six months. the president was interested in the proposal for development. one of the question

the russian united social democratic party was created, its leadership included many prominent figures from the times remaining in the past perestroika. mikhail gorbachev was elected chairman of the new left party, and its appearance was welcomed by the entire european social democracy, but time was, alas, irrevocably lost the mood of the people, as well as their attitude to the only president of the ussr changed radically. the transition of the soviet union in 1990 to a multi-party system and to a presidential form of government was an important step, opening up opportunities for political modernization, which could in turn accelerate critical changes in the economy, but the ussr was already beginning to burst at the seams . task - was the search for a new saving version of the union statehood. even if the damaged liver worries better take care of it in time , two active components could help relieve inflammation and restore liver cells. see liver care with a vengeance. why do you need my megapowers? you can also activate your activate a free transfer of a minute of unlimited gigabyte

sun and a year ago, and he reacts, he speaks as usual, representing the coalition of the social democratic party with the libertarian party and the greens, in short, we have zelena is ahead of us, and once she was also a candidate for the post of chancellor. maybe she is acting more decisively than golf because she told herself that she is still a young person and plans a further career . in german says that it is necessary to provide weapons in ukraine more decisively and to really fulfill their promises, so that is exactly what oxford announced, and in addition to this, how to say circular deliveries, they should also supposedly how he thinks to save him, we can only such a situation in scholz because he has many and in general in germany there are many more connections with russia, where energy carriers are supplied from, first of all, and let's say from the ukrainian orna, which has now slowed down in the parks of ukraine, it does not depend on germany or on metal products, that is, uh, in germany still one has such a moment that she wants to avoid by planting in ukraine and russia negotiate

by a government parties by the probations, f t p party by the greens and also within the social democratic party to tell shows that it's important for him to go there to give a sign in to actually also say not just was not just promise is this will many have been demanding by the german chancellor, but it shows himself pointed out he does not want to be one of those who go into you create pretty quickly for in photo opportunity and then to leave again. so he needs to have something in his suitcase with him within this delegation, i could be 2 things on one side, having showing german support for a possible membership with the european union for ukraine. you just mentioned it with rebecca that, that a european commission president was off on the line was that that, that they want to show the support and want to have this final assessment that will present next week on one. so it could be that, and on the other side, it could be the heavy weapons that ukraine is having, relying on, especially now that, that munition is going out in the ukraine, ukraine's defense ministry has stated so it's not jus

kravchuk grigory surkis and viktor medvedchuk gathered already in a political project, the social democratic partyukraine, united, by the way, at about the same time, kravchuk's famous phrase appeared, only dead fools do not change their points of view in 2004 kravchuk calls himself a vip agitator for viktor yanukovych in 2006 heads the wrong bloc, created in opposition to the political power of viktor yushchenko. and in 2010, he becomes the confidant of another contender. even zelensky managed to attract yulia tymoshenko to the highest post of the state kravchuk to an important audience. activities, appointing him, albeit for a short time, the head of the ukrainian delegation at the minsk talks on the donbass, people so connected. finally, the heavyweights come into play. and we saw literally another chattering there. yes, any attempt to get away from concrete implementation in an interview with our program in september 2020, leonid kravchuk said that it was quite possible to resolve the conflict in the format of the normandy four with the participation of the leaders of russia and germany, franc

so i think, yes, of course there is a legacy of the his party, the social democrats. there are there is a very strong pacifist movement in germany as a country, not just among people who vote for spd but among other, other parts of the country. so there are very strong ties to russia in eastern germany and all those people are very skeptical about weapons deliveries. so the society is split. i would say we have and this is what polls are also showing we have some 40% in favor of delivering of heavy, heavy weapons and like 37 or 38 i think against it. so this is something that charles also is considering, um, and but he will have to decide and i think he's moving in that direction, but moving slowly. um christoph. do you think the chancellor is right to be cautious to be fearful? that a stronger german a more proactive approach could in fact precipitate uh world war three, as he actually himself has said personally in the military field, i think he's too cautious. it's a different thing with economy and sanctions. so i would he give us a bit uh answer from my point of

so i think, yes, of course, there is a legacy of the, his party, the social democrats. there are, there is a very strong pacifist movement in germany as a country, not just in among people who vote for speedy but among other other parts of the country. so there are very strong ties to russia in east, in germany. and all those people are very skeptical about weapons delivery. so their society is split, i would say, and we have, and this is what polls are also showing that we have some 40 percent in favor of delivering of a heavy weapons. and like 3738, i think against it. so this is something that shows also is considering and but he will have to decide and i think he's moving in that direction. but moving slowly. christa, do you think the chancellor is right to be cautious to be fearful that a stronger german and more proactive approach could in fact, precipitate world war 3. as he actually himself said, personally in the military field, i think he's too cautious. it's a different thing with economy and sanctions. so i would here give us an answer. from my point of view

germany, and even in the parties themselves there are different positions, for example, in the social democratic partypeople. there would be a radical vote and there is a more moderate vote, but that's why it's a big discussion. well, it seems to me that in fact even in eastern germany of eastern europe there is not a complete vision of what and what and what should actually happen that there ukrainian tanks should be in moscow or what is this? this is what is meant by this, this is the victory over russia, and that is why. well, there are those too, of course, in europe it also has such an element that many people are simply afraid that this will turn into the third world war, what is this there will be a nuclear war that er then russia will also fight from germany and that there er it will be an apocalypse of some kind and er and russia plays very well with this er seven er thoughts and there is such a psychological war er in western europe in relation to this so that it does not turn into a third education you he and more one question about preserving putin's face , what we know about what macron w

kravchuk grigory surkis and viktor medvedchuk gathered already in a political project, the social democratic partyukraine , united, by the way, at about the same time, kravchuk’s famous phrase appeared, only dead fools do not change their points of view in 2004 kravchuk calls himself a vip agitator for viktor yanukovych in 2006 who. the bloc is wrong, created in opposition to the political power of viktor yushchenko. and in 2010, it becomes the confidant of another contender. to the highest post of the state of yulia tymoshenko, even zelensky managed to attract kravchuk to important public activities, appointing him and for a short time the head of the ukrainian delegation at the minsk talks on the donbass. people connected like that. here, finally, the heavy scales come into play. and we saw literally another chattering there. yes, any attempt to get away from a specific implementation in an interview with our program in september 2020. leonid kravchuk said that it was quite possible to resolve the conflict in the format of the normandy four with the participation of the leaders of russia and ger

and we see also the dependency of the social democratic party from some questions about the former chancellor schroeder and other items. but what we want to see is that the chancellor takes up the decision of the parliament from the bonus talk as of 28th of april, where more than 500 members of parliament have supported not only financial support and to a trauma and medical care. but also the delivery of heavy weapons like leopard and mater and heavy artillery. and we question why the chancellor does not take over this strong request from the parliament and is delivering and they are the questions arising know about this delivery. the german defense minister, christina langley, i had more to say today on the heavy weapons germany is delivering. let's have a quick listen damn against latitudes argued. come after us, we have as we have made a very clear commitment that along with our dutch friends, we will provide the arm at howard said 2000 and the house below is fast up cash lawson. when the training is almost complete and also they can be deploy to ukraine along with the ukranian soldiers wh

whether that is something that would have sold his shaken off, complete the also being from the social democrat party and unfold society quite clearly said that there was an issue if germany is highest representative, the president is not welcome. in kias, just hours before heading there, we also heard from ukraine's president lensky, essentially accusing would have souls germany of still doing a balancing act between standing by ukraine side and relations with russia. so this issue is not going away. now we've heard in the report, there's been a lot of criticism lately about especially about germany's sluggish weapons deliveries to you crying. or you just mentioned it about germany, friends when a circle see the lumber, i just gave an update just a short while ago. let's have a listen. the i'm biggest lather, tucson to come after us. we have to, we have made a very clear commitment that along with our dutch friends, we will provide the armored howards or 2000 and the outs below as fast push lawson when the training is almost complete and also they can be deployed to ukraine along with the ukranian s

or is it the legacy of the social democratic party and those ties to moscow and politic that lot just mentioned? or is it perhaps that he's been essentially intimidated by putting scare tactics? i think it's all of those things and i would add one more. i think it's also fear that russia could cut off gas supplies suddenly and germany economy would suffer. i think this is also something that he has in mind when he's hesitant in making a decision and deliver heavy weapons to ukraine as soon enough. so i think, yes, of course there is a legacy of the, his part of the social democrats there are, there is a very strong pacifist more movement in germany as a country, not just in among people who vote for speedy, but among other other parts of the country, so there are very strong ties to russia in east, in germany, and all those people are very skeptical about weapons delivery. so the society is split, i would say, and we have, and this is what polls are also showing. we have some 40 percent in favor of delivering of a heavy weapons and like 3738 i think against it. so this is something th

shield the conflict ukraine. sherman jazz are all shots that 37 percent support with the social democratic party, fresh off a regional election, locked in the largest state of nor drying west valley. earlier this month. sho, get just trying to extinguish the wind stand for ukraine seems to be symptomatic of a larger problem of rudderless leadership at home. candidates prime minister just intruder took a popularity hit earlier this year when he invoked martial law including the board of canadian citizens bank account. all in response to freedom come boy truckers and their supporters gathering in the nation capital to demand an end to the government . heavy handed colbert families now and 41 percent popularity true. don't have that yet. recovered from the treating. average canadians with measures normally reserved for care suspects. so having these are their popularity problems. well, they could try sweeping in front of their own doors and stock working their way down not least promises to their own people that basically to be able to fix during their campaign exist right there. meanwhile, k of sa

we met yesterday with two parliamentarians and with the social democratic party, this is the party thate majority in the swedish parliament, and they speak very carefully about russian aggression about the war in ukraine, they are really very careful about these issues when we they said that nato was also decided by the social democrats quite recently, because even at the beginning of march there is an armenian prime minister and the leader of the social democrats, magdalena anderson, she was against joining nato, and we we have to understand that sweden has a very long way to go, they are proud of the fact that their country has not been at war for about 200 years and for them joining nato is a very difficult decision. to ukraine and started this terrible war. therefore, now the social democrats, as well as the majority of swedes, support joining nato, and they believe that these obstacles that exist in certain countries of the european union and in certain nato countries, we are talking about turkey, will be removed as much as possible with the help of friendly communications and coop

so i have a deeply realist view those occur from social democratic parties, but guided by the way. or 100 years since a second international'st dealt with the problem ofit communists by the challenging centerleft parties with those in europe or the united states. we have some familiarity of what actually needs to be done in terms of firmness and clarity. think i'll be good if that was reflected in the way in which foreign security policy is articulated as well. >> i guess i have to ask is that possible of the american system? we have a whole lot of policymakers in congress and in the senate all with platform. and of the chinese watch the statements very, very carefully. also attribute to them policy because theysa have message of legislative action. >> it is done in a way the chinese manage a certain diversity of its current position we take for example the people's daily says a post with a time says great people daily'e money for opens the chinese comments party we all read the opinion pieces, we read the editorials. we know what the line is. and then of course we have the chinese

the social democratic party of ukraine is an organization with an interesting history.akthrough in the first presidential elections, the nationalist vyacheslav chervov , years later, already in the company of a businessman. viktor medvedchuk's party campaigned for friendship with russia against nato during the first orange maidan with medvedchuk together they created a political bloc called not so, which was an antonym. e slogan. so the orange slogan of president yushchenko there and the orange coalitions in general, and only in the program of this bloc it was not so for friendship with russia against nato, two american invaders and so on. amazingly, 10 years later, in 2015, leonid kravchuk is already becoming the main face of the public initiative for the movement of ukraine into nato , another political shifter. he was one of the first to proclaim ukraine's course towards nato . uh, nato is only what they were extremely afraid of and are now afraid of. uh, russia and her leadership, because it is clear that, uh, whatever relations with ukraine are, but this is all a z

those of us who come from the social democratic party for 100 years since the second international in the 80s with the problem of communist parties challenging centerleft parties in europe, the unitedstates or australia . we have something on your mitof what needs to be done in terms of clarity. it was the way in which foreign policy was articulated as well i guess i have to ask is that possible in the american system where we have a lot of policymakers in congress and in the senate all with a platform and i know the chinese watch their state very carefully and often attribute to them policy weight because they may presage legislative action. >> i think in its own way the chinese manage a certain diversity of its own position . take for example hathe people's daily as opposed to what global times says. people's daily is one of the four organs of the chinese communist party so we assiduously follow and read the opinion pieces, we read theeditorials . we know what the line is and ho then of course we have the chinese ink tanks which may say things in variance with the line and you have

so i have a deeply realist view of how you deal with leninists those of us who come from social democratic parties like i do by the way for a hundred years since the second international in the 1880s, we've dealt with the problem of communist parties challenging center left parties, whether it's in europe or the united states from own country, australia, so we have some familiarity of what actually needs to be done in terms of firmness and clarity. i think it would be good if that was reflected in the way in which foreign security policy is articulated as well. guess i have to ask is that possible in the american system where we have you know a whole lot of policymakers in congress and in the senate all with a platform and and i know the chinese watch their statements very very carefully and often attribute to them policy weight because they may presage legislative action. well, i think it's it's own way the chinese a certain diversity of its own position take for example what the people's daily says as opposed to what global times says. people's daily is one of the four organs of the chinese comm

proposed to reduce the temperature in houses to 18 °. dubious initiative was made by the social democratic partylans to raise the cost of their services by 47% next year. 2/3 of americans may experience blackouts in the summer electricity is reported in a report by local corporations in germany demanding higher food prices. this is the only way to save the country's agricultural industry, the head of the farmers' union said at the same time, the german chemical concern is preparing to lay off 40,000 employees. the reason is the lack of an alternative to russian hydrocarbons. the next package of sanctions from the european union will have a negative impact on the financial system of the baltic countries, prices are rising at a breakneck pace, and consumers are confident that tomorrow it will only get worse, this opinion was shared with our tv channel by latvian political scientist andrey starikov. according to him, an endless number of imposed sanctions will finally kill the baltic economy. sanctions work different sanctions they work but in a different direction, because sanctions destroy those

kravchuk grigory surkis and viktor medvedchuk gathered already in the political project of the social democratic party about the same time, kravchuk's famous phrase appeared, only dead fools do not change of his point of view in 2004 kravchuk calls himself a vip agitator for viktor yanukovych in 2006 leads a bloc created in opposition to the political power of viktor yushchenko and in 2010 he becomes a confidant another contender. to the highest post of yulia tymoshenko’s state, even zelensky managed to attract krovchak to important public activities, appointing him, albeit for a long time, the head of the ukrainian delegation at the minsk talks on donbass . finally, the heavyweights come into play. and we saw literally another chattering there. yes, any attempt to get away from a specific implementation in an interview with our program in september 2020, leonid kravchuk said that it was quite possible to resolve the conflict in the format of the normandy four with the participation of the leaders of russia and germany, france and ukraine, they say, as in the ninety- first in belovezhskaya pushcha, wh

you see, they are not even embarrassed that there are socialist communist social democratic parties alls a direct decision here once and banned once and banned all left-wing parties. everything was completely destroyed, now they completely took it and everything is banned. now, about zelensky, you know this is the attitude towards europeans. it is possible, of course, as if you like to treat europe then an absolutely ungrateful person. well, that's his nature. maybe i do not welcome the fact that germany is making a decision to supply weapons there and so on. yes, even from a moral and ethical point of view. this is pure rudeness. well here's an objective erase. i don’t know why the europeans are rudeness on the part of zelensky and macronism. yes, well, this is pure rudeness, this is a separate feature. ukrainian political elite, they behave like this to someone you know, that's how a girl lost innocence. here is her deceiver. they just say, a minute a point and everyone should, that is, the girl came, but how can she remember from whom exactly she was brukkachen, and this is not about

proposed to reduce the temperature in houses to 18 °. dubious initiative was made by the social democratic partyviders announced plans to raise the cost of their services by 47% next year. 2/3 of americans may face a power outage in the summer, according to a report, local corporations in germany demand higher food prices - this is the only way save the country's agricultural industry, said the head of the farmers union at the same time, the german chemical concern is preparing to lay off 40,000 employees. the reason is the lack of an alternative to russian hydrocarbons. the next package of sanctions from the european union will have a negative impact on the financial system of the baltic countries, prices are growing at a frantic pace, and consumers are sure that tomorrow it will only get worse, this opinion was shared with our tv channel by latvian political scientist andrey starikov according to him, an infinite number of sanctions have been imposed will finally kill the baltic economy. sanctions work different sanctions they work but in a different direction, because sanctions destroy those

right now also for the fact that, as the newspaper found out, the traditional party of the social democratic partyany was due to lack of money for a personal meeting with scholz, anyone who wanted to pay could immediately pay 15,000 euros. the price suggested a photo of scholz's own dining table and a chance to talk face-to-face with the german chancellor. well, now attention to the caricature screen, on which the same scholz lies naked on the table. in what the mother gave birth covered with leaves lettuce factor lined up. this dish is all with large sums of money to talk to scholz again to solve your problems. you can only for 15.000 euros. this is just the beginning of the crisis, and jokes are jokes, and an aerospace salon is opening right now in berlin, completely dedicated to military equipment, civil aircraft. there are not even submitted to the opening visited. naturally, scholz spoke of supporting ukraine, which would require germany to create the largest army in europe . agreed after the well-known events that began just on june 22, 81 years ago, that germany should no longer have. it is

see, they are not even embarrassed that all over the world there is the socialist communist social democratic partyowards europeans. of course, you can treat the euro as you like, but this is an absolutely ungrateful person. well, that's his nature. maybe i do not welcome the fact that germany is making a decision to supply weapons there and so on. yes, even from a moral and ethical point of view. this is pure rudeness. well, for the sake of objectivity. i don't know why europeans. so this is rudeness on the part of zelensky and macron, and shvost. yes, well, this is pure rudeness, this is a separate feature. the ukrainian political elite, they behave like this, you know, like a girl who has lost her innocence. here is her deceiver. it’s just that they say, and everyone should take a minute, that is, the girl-reckoner, but how can she remember from whom exactly she was brukkachen, and this is not about ukraine, but about their vile corrupt nasty elite, but look at how zelensky's opponents behave in this case. look, he criticizes scholz, he criticizes macron, and klitschko speaks and says, no, well

these or other political forces that are quite influential , for example, the social democrats do not have political partypartners in ukraine, and this negatively affects the dynamics of mutual relations and there is skepticism. sometimes present

of all, you know, i love when these people on the opposition want to talk about the socialism of the democratic party. explain to me than nazism in the fascism of the gop right now. >> well, let's start with the topic at hand and you can extend out from there. when it comes to november, what are the main issues that are going to push you to vote? >> well, i have a couple of issues. january 6th, that was an act of domestic terrorism. i don't care how you feel about it, the truth is the truth. the fact is, you have the supreme court that has been politicized with abortion and this gun issue. and i'm sorry, i've read that second amendment. i've yet to see where it says that a psychopath has a right

with these or other political forces that are quite influential, for example, the social democrats do not have political party partners in ukraine, and this negatively affects the dynamics of relations and there is skepticism what is sometimes present also affects because it is the second largest political force in the european union, it is worth working on it, yes , it is understandable, but since this issue is being discussed so lively today, can you explain to us what happened well, it is clear to every average citizen what advantages ukraine will receive in the case of granting the status of a candidate for eu accession. how will ordinary ordinary citizens feel? and what is no less important, what obligations will official kyiv take on? well , first of all, it is more symbolism. that is, it is about symbolism . about the recognition by the european union and politicians and citizens of our desire to become part of a full-fledged part, that is, to accept the rules of the game that are directly applicable to the european union, this is the first and the second - unfortunately does not give us guarantees tha

to get sweden and finland joining, the swedish application is in some trouble because the social democrat partyato chief is in stockholm and what he has said in a speech that their is it is unthinkable nato allies were not react if sweden were attacked. the subtext of that is, if sweden doesn't get in, don't worry, we will stand by you. that is the message from the swedes. it underlines for you the difficulty is that this application is in at the moment, it is due to be resolved at the end of the month. my colleague will be there for bbc news and she will be reporting every bit of that row because it is important to the nato efforts to effectively convince the russians there is no future in the kind of action they have taken in ukraine. we will bring you more on that later in the afternoon. the long—awaited plan to transform england's food system was published this morning, with the government promising to put farmers and food security at the heart of their reforms. the prime minister denied criticism that the plan fails to tackle obesity by leaving out a recommended tax on sugar and salt, sayi

parties. a new social democrat government has just been elected. the left, too, is embracing these policies.onna be tough on migrants and tough on muslims? martin: you have to be tough on migration, or you have to at least act like you're tough on migration, and that's one of the reason why the social democrats come into power, in my view, and-- hamish: couldn't have won without doing that. martin: i don't believe so. no, no, i don't believe so. ♪♪♪ hamish: this is vollsmose. officially, it's a ghetto, one of 29 across the country, with high migrant populations, low incomes, and high crime rates. ♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ hamish: if you commit a crime here, you get double the punishment. soon, a thousand families will be evicted and the homes demolished to promote integration. ♪♪♪ the boys at vollsmose boxing club are trying to fight off that stigma. ali is already a champion boxer. ♪♪♪ ali aziz al-tamimi: yeah, i'm very proud, because i made my family-- i make a lot of people proud of me, so i'm also proud. ♪♪♪ hamish: do you like it here? ali: i like it here, and i don't want to move any place. hamish: but

party than it has been. democrats abandon pro-lifers. pro-lifers moved to the republican party. there is a lot of in the basic social justice message that how to appeal to lots of democrats and i think we see a lot more pro-life sentiment among hispanics and african-americans than among the big fundraisers and the democratic party. host: cheryl out of los angeles, democratic. good morning. caller: i want to preface this by saying that the father in heaven is neither democratic, republican, or independent, nor is he an author of confusion. he is not into religion but i want to preface this by saying that the coach who was praying, in matthew 6:6 it says when you pray secretly, the father in heaven will reward you openly. you did not tell you to make a public thing about prayer. it is a private thing that once you do it, he will reward you openly if you do his precepts and examples. another thing i want to say about this abortion thing, i am against abortion but i am for the women who choose to have their bodies to do what they want to because when they were going to take the lady and stone her, he said he who is with

of all, you know, i love when these people on the opposition want to talk about the socialism of the democratic party. explain to me than nazism in the fascism of the gop right now. >> well, let's start with the topic at hand and you can extend out from there. when it comes to november, what are the main issues that are going to push you to vote? >> well, i have a couple of issues. january 6th, that was an act of domestic terrorism. i don't care how you feel about it, the truth is the truth. the fact is, you have the supreme court that has been politicized with abortion and this gun issue. and i'm sorry, i've read that second amendment. i've yet to see where it says that a psychopath has a right to own a weapon or, for that matter -- >> for gradually this recorded program and take you live to the capitol hill for congressional hearing on gun violence. members of the house oversight committee took a break for both on the house floor. earlier, they talk to victims of the recent mass shootings and evolve, a texas and buffalo, new york. this hearing is about to start again, live coverage here on c-span 3

yeah, we have 3 parties in the coalition government in germany. you had the social democrats and the greens and they are both a saying we want to and the combustion engine by 2035. this is absolutely necessary to fight climate change and to reach climate neutrality by 2050, which is the use overall goal. and so they say e mobility is the future. then we also have the business laundry of friendly, free democrats in the government with their leader who's send it now who is also jimmy's finance minister. and he repeated this morning and no a we want to reject this proposal because we think we have to continue using a equals at least 44 cars. and this is a very contradictory, because if yours are more client friendly you than fossil fuels, but less climate, french re friendly than immobility. and their critics also say that these fuels are needed for planes, for example, for ships and are, there won't be enough in the next coming years in the following years. for cars as well. all righty to be correspond. marina strauss and brussels. thank you. the g 7 is said to condemn china's

party could have gone g in. one was represented different versions of socialism mondale approach as a the idea of the democrat becoming a new democratad really focusing that is really what helped shape the direction of the party going forward what happened in 1974 and who got elected just give you a hard time. 1974 is another critical year in political history. the big thing that is dominated is watergate ready have a newup group of people who come into congress watergate babies who represent a change in these party. one of the things that's often depicted because there called the watergate babies they were against nixon. satchel change the democratic party. to focus on big government and they wanted change. this is people like garyy hart, even a whole slew of new candidates who come in for their joint later by people like al gore points people like bill clinton. there's a change in thear party direction and the party structure for the other big thing that happens is the economic recession. there is a real struggle with the democratic party for new solutions of the economy. going to find new ways to address the proble

tell us where the state is headed, but i think it is gonna tell us about the democratic party is headed. i'm not here to socialize along democrats despite my former standing as a republican. the feeling among democrats in california is a little bit of a frustration. so most of the days was talking about, i think they feel that there was a -- balance public safety while still being a liberal. still being a progressive. you can want to banned assault rifles, and also think that cops should be protecting your neighborhood. i think there is a feeling among democrats that some on the progressive left, went overboard. cheswold chesa boudin is an example downtown francisco. -- the school board members recalled here in san francisco. and possibly, i think the most rheumatic thing is i think will happen with caruso, and the mayor's race in california. he was a mitt romney republican. had me running for merritt los angeles, i think if he wins that, that would be a real shock to the system. but even that he is in the game tells you that the democratic days is ready to look for more sensible, reforms, oriented agenda. it's p

first, i love when these people in the opposition want to talk about the socialism of the democratic partyn to me the fascism of the gop right now. host: let's start the topic at hand. when it comes to november, what are the main issues that are going to push you to vote? caller: i have a couple issues. january 6, that was an act of domestic terrorism. the truth is the truth. the fact is you have the supreme court that has been politicized with abortion and this gun issue and i am sorry. i have read that second amendment. i have yet to see where it says that a psychopath has the right to own a weapon or that a law-abiding citizen has a right to own a military style assault weapon for protection. that is an abuse of power. let's call it what it is. host: are those specific things going to motivate you to vote for a specific candidate this november? caller: i am leaning straight democratic at this point. i think the republican party are crazy. i think that is what they are. when they had charge of the house for trump's first two years, what do they actually do? they could not even get their

that's the voters saying that the democratic party has embraced socialism. we don't want this. want that old centrist democratic party back which by the way jimmy carter represented so i think we could have 25-plus seats in the house. i think we'll get the senate majority as well but the big comparison with jimmy carter is the fact that after carter's failure in everyway, culturally, national security, the economy, we got ronald regan but it wasn't just ronald regan we got a majority in the senate and a political realignment in the country where democrats, these reagan democrats, switched their voting patterns to the republican party. what you're going to see in november is the beginning of a realignment where people who had voted democrat but loved cops and loved the military, believe you should commemorate d-day for example, and hate socialism they are going to come the republican s way. now the question is what does the republican party do when they have those new supporters i hope they do the right thing. stuart: matt schlapp great stuff thanks for joining us we'll see you

democratic party ballistics -- party politics, which is what she would do. facebook is a persona non grata in the democratic party. facebook has been shown to have so many social harms. she is to some extent responsible for not having taken an affection on it. -- taken enough action on it. emily: what about an appointed office? david: sheet has been talked about being a treasury -- she has been talked about being a treasury secretary in the past. she would be a good one. a role like that would be controversial because of facebook's history. emily: we will be watching. she is transitioning the team over the summer. her direct reports will transition over the summer. she will remain on facebook's board. david: javier is an impressive guy too. emily: he has been running growth and meta is still growing despite all of this. david, thank you. i'm glad you are here today. glad to see you in person in new york. we will have much more on this throughout the show. we will keep talking about women in tech, talk to the female founders fund to get the pulse on vc funding trends for women. and more on sheryl sandberg leaving facebook as well. this is bloomberg. ♪ emily: ve

be an outsider is to use her incredible fundraising and her incredible social media presence to basically make the democratic party more. more liberal more progressive right with these endorsements, you know pushing. pushing the party further left and you know, what do we think about those efforts or how successful they've been or a transformative? they've been i mean, i you know, i keep thinking about texas right? she's had her eye on texas since before she was elected. she keeps saying. we're going to turn texas blue. just watch just like watch it happen and and she said it again on the night that she was elected in the general election. she was giving her. she was giving her victory speech and that was the night that ted cruz. be better or work and and that those results were playing in the background as she was giving her acceptance speech and she stopped her speech. and she was like we're gonna we're gonna turn texas in a generation. in this generation and when you watch what she the way she handled ted cruz during the failure of the electric grid last winter. when texans were freezing to death and ted cruz w

middle class, all suffering miserably because of biden's new green deal socialism, and, of course, his adherence to the democratic partymate alarmism religious consult. it's like you can't even deprogram these people they're so nuts. joe biden is headed to the beach yet again but not before lecturing ordinary tax-paying hard working, law abiding american citizens and threatening to rip away our second amendment rights which he thinks is not absolute. i tend to disagree. take a look. >> the second amendment like all other rights is not absolute. we need to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines. and if we can't ban assault weapons, then we should raise the age to purchase them from 18 to 21. strengthen background checks enact safe storage laws and red flag laws. repeal the immunity that protects gun manufacturers from liability. address the mental health crisis deepening the trauma of gun violence as a consequence of that violence. enough. enough. my god, the fact that the majority of the senate republicans don't want any of these proposals even to be debated or come up for a vote, i find unconscionable. meet t

kinds of versions of democratic socialism, but i think the sanders campaign is represented and then the other side was mont was the mondale approaches the traditional democratic party and the third would be someone like gary hart as this kind of as a more who stood for the ideas of the atari democrats or who become the new democrats really focusing on sort of tech and trade in the new economy as the future for the party and that's really what dominated to help the shape the direction of the party going forward and what really my book looks at before we talk about 1984 though. let's talk about 1974. what happened in 1974 and who got elected then that helped proceed this and i should say when i say 1984. i mean not the george orwell book, but then 1984 but the election but the you know, i'm just giving you a hard time the 1974 was it is actually another critical year and political history and the big and the big the big thing that's from dominated. the the news was watergate and you have this new group of congress of people who come into congress who were come to the owners the watergate babies who represent a sea change in the party and one of the things that it's o

so many people for women, the women's movement for social justice organizations from the labor movement, you're both independently of the democratic party. we need our own independent mass organizations. and that's a member. that was the only way that will be made was one in the 1st place. you know, nobody was passed. i view yourself that bio republican majority quoted 973. how did that happen? because there was a mass limit on the street that understood that we have to fight to it, to someone who will this ruling effect most it is going to set millions, but have stand up millions of people living in states where getting a law getting an abortion would when breaking the law, primarily it would affect poor women, poor g v. people. and ultimately let's remember that reproductive rights are one aspect off, or we're all health care and or we don't care that people need that especially women need. and so we're running late. this morning we'll fall on the backs off for women and what people. and that's why it's really important to understand that the way to fight back is to, you know, to build a kind of working class solid id across gender, a

party of socialism and liberation. gloria law river says such anti democratic position makes us more isolated. as lopez opened a door and president of cuba have said, as well as many others, they're all seen. the u. s. is itself the one that's becoming isolated by this highly anti democratic position to deny the invitation to the 3 countries q of venezuela. and he got iowa in the whole world, whether it's the u. s. army of ukraine and its involvement in eastern europe with the sanctions against russia. that if you don't go by the way of the us, you will suffer sanctions, blockade, and even war. and what's taking place right now with a summit of the americas is a failure by the united states because it can no longer dominate and dictate as it used in those countries have said, it's time that we have the say in our own company, the community of latin american in caribbean states was formed. so lock, this is why they have begun to insist that there has to be economic and political, social integration of the americas without the us and without canada, who have dictated to them for too long, hearty