the warren court was famous, like in brown versus board of education, for having social science data in its footnotes. is the present court less receptive to data in this respect? one might think of the argument over the use of comparative or international law data, which has been somewhat controversial. sixth, what are the methodological debates? justices into debates about textualism, regionalism, and questions of that kind. seventh, " trend, if any, would you care to remark on from the beginning to the present time of the roberts court? are we able to paint any kind of picture of this particular court? i mentioned to the declining dockets. he was not here to speculate on how cases appear to be decided on merits. number nine, what i call avoidance techniques. there are ways the justices have -- that courts in general have of simply deflecting a case before it reaches the marriage. having decided to tear it, having it go off on grounds like standing or mootness, the sort of thing laid public does not have much concern about lawyers and judges, and are those devices bei

the warren court was famous in brown versus board of education for having social science data in its footnotes. is the present court less receptive to data of that kind? in this respect, one might think about the argument over the use of comparative or international law data, which is somewhat controversial. sixthly, what about the method logical debates? do justices enter into debates over things like text ulism and originalism and questions of that kind? second, what trends if any, would you care to remark on from the beginning to the present time of the roberts' court? it has only been four years, but are we beginning to paint any kind of picture of this particular court? eighth, i mentioned the declining docket. does anyone care to speculate on why fewer cases appear to be decided on the merits. number nine, what i call avoidance techniques. there are ways that justices have that courts in general have of simply deflecting a case before it reaches the merits, either not hearing it at all, or having decided to hear it and having it go off on grounds like standing or ripeness or mo

board of education for having a social science data in its with nouns. is the present court less receptive to data have that kind and in this respect one might think of the arguments over the use of comparative or international law did it which as you know has been somewhat controversial and what about methodological the beit? to the justices enter into debates over things like textualism, regionalism, and questions of that kind? seventh, what true and if any would you care to remark on from the beginning to the present time of the roberts court? it has ali been for years but are beginning to be able to pay any kind of picture for this particular court? i mentioned the declining dockets. does anyone care to speculate on five syracuses decided on the merits of. number nine, when i call avoidance techniques. there are ways the justices have that course in general have the simply deflecting a case before it reads the marriage. and not hearing it all when having decided to hear that having him go off on grounds like standing or rightness or movement. in the