the title of my talk is "cyber-bullying: social aggression and social exclusion." research definitions of bullying emphasize two key element -- chronicity and elements of power. this makes sense if you are talking about traditional face-to-face bullying, but they don't make as much sense in the cyber world. for example, chronicity is less relevant because with one post a young people can air something to peers hundreds of times and see it again and again. imbalance of power means something very different in cyber space. experts who stand strong in holding to these traditional criteria of blowiullying conclut occurs at low base rates, is an overrated phenomenon, and does not involve any youth who don't also bully face to face. i don't agree with this conclusion, and i don't think that we need to be using these traditional bullying criteria when we try to understand cyber aggression. would you like to bring these up? okay. please go ahead. >> did we hook up hdmi up here? sorry. >> perhaps i'll keep talking. i prefer to think in terms of cyber aggression. cyber aggres

that's not at all contradictory to what it was actually part of the social democratic tradition social democracy was never anti national or a national not you are not given the internet was international but were built on the foundations of existing nations and. people it's not your own but your father could your father represent this position and yes i don't tend to reference him or his positions but in this regard we agree and one hundred percent would not put twenty first on. one times imprisonment we've come to the end of this interesting discussion now for the three questions that we always ask our guests to complete work for national feeling for me and that's neither right wing nor left wing because. the not your nation is a community of culture consciousness and communication tools can munch of. this is a social reality and what matters is the approach we must if. he were alive today i would tell my father just that many people even those who criticized and acknowledge his significant accomplishments that. we've gotten this vote. they find their old form the social democrats hav

of democracy and social justice. and this would not at all be artificial but connected to the historical realities that already played a role one hundred fifty years ago shortly before we know it from theone of what we did before it was an idea of a fraternal league of nations instead of one nation pitted against another this was also a clear aspect of your father's attitude to reunification which many on the left feared would herald a return to nationalism that this was because he doesn't nation have to be dissolved in order to create international leagues or united europe in the open. the bus three but definitely has to be dissolved is the idea of the old school sovereign nation states are not under which belongs in the past in that. this it has no provision for the nation as part of a community. i think in my own shop nation states exist and we still need them by this components of united europe and they have the same problem as the e.u. . finding a political direction. and that direction should be given by the na

chairman, this amendment is directed and designed to protect social security and medicare. very straightforward, nothing in the underlying bill can take effect unless the trustees confirmed that no harm will come to the medicare trust fund in social script trust fund. mr. chairman, i think throughout this process today we've heard about process, i shame in this committee oversees social security and my dear friend and good colleague mr. johnson who has been built and i who have built have never even had a hearing in the last two years. that being said and having criticized our colleagues for not paying for a lot of these tax cuts for the altar wealthy, turns out i was mistaken. they will be paid for by forcing devastating cuts to programs like social security and medicare. consider that in 2026 with the tax provisions were talking about will kick in. according to mr. roberts greenstein from the senate budget and policy priorities, we estimate the legislation would cost roughly 2.9 trillion over the 26 -- 126-25 pick the first full decade it would be in effect. the revenue l

went to the social media start? the russianow about activity, his indictment of the internet research, special counsel moeller talked about it starting in 2014, and that corresponds with some of our research from other analysts really shows in a concerted way that is about when it started. that does not mean it was not happening earlier, and there were other kinds of attempts to influence our politics, going back a number of different instances, as we talked about earlier, but because of useerted efforts to americans, polaroid against each other, it really started ron 2014. host: do you agree, 2014? guest: i think it is hard to pinpoint. but the caller mentioning the german marshall fund. not support the viewers with the history of the organization, but it started with a gift from the german people to the american people in appreciation or the marshall plan, which was to support during world war ii to help rebuild europe after the war. that is our history. we publish on our website all of our donors. we have seven o

hasn't been torn down there's no investment in social housing social housing is often run down and housing is a basic human right we need to provide social housing and the sense of community that's built into the d.n.a. of these buildings is irreplaceable yeah due to dramatically the the communicate that without it being boring a door because it is clearly explained the tearing down. our approach was to bring people into social housing itself so it's really important that the play happens in a council estate community space and it's really important that that space actually comes to life that the history of that space that the sense that that space could be a place where a fire happens where. blackouts happen where the place is not maintained all of that actually happens and you experience it from we'll i think that's what gives the play its urgency and really makes you feel wow this place matt is it's bringing people together and it has a life of its own but ironic that it is in a community of the city which is being gentrified which is losing social housing and over the government's as i

of people on social media. i think it all was one of the most instructive people who could teach us a lot. the most recent complaints -- trump has picked up this idea that social media and online forms are biased against conservatives and him. one of the arguments he points to recently is that when he searches google news for stories about trump, they are largely negative. google's response and the response of many others say they are pulling from mainstream media sources that run headlines that are negative. the read on the president is often very negative. and the president argues, you should be pulling from sources that are not mainstream but are more supportive of me. past, google has never had to wrestle with that. because they said that if we take a snapshot of the mainstream media, we take a snapshot of what people are saying online. we are at the point where more broadly in the country, we are not agreeing on sets of facts or thinking about the world. so google newly has to wrestle with that. now there'

media followers the government doesn't actually say that it cracks down on people with large social media accounts it says that it's introducing this law as you said is part of a larger package of laws to crackdown partially on fake news and to maintain the security of the country now why social media as our viewers may already know during egypt's version of the arab spring social media was a huge part of of the uprising and during this time you had a large group large groups of activists who in a very short time gained a very large following and the hundred thousands and some of them even in the millions and. egypt the state's control over. traditional media outlets like newspapers and t.v. stations is pretty tight whether it's public broadcasters or private t.v. stations and social media was really the last front where you could get some dissent you could get some free expression but the state had so far not been able to regulate it in the way that it regulates traditional media and basically what they did with this law is. treat social media accounts as media media companies whic

organizations and leaders across the world here to some vague form of socialism in fact socialism is getting more popular in places that are a lot closer to washington than venezuela. who believe that every working class american deserves the opportunity to change their economic destiny and their children's future that is well that's the message that we need to brains haven't in terms. of piecing this. prime sisson on democracy where people will like the salon just don't apply to the rich. hand and we should absolutely have a health care system that provides help here for every citizen in our country socialism is quite popular among millennial is in the united states more popular than capitalism in fact some pollsters say that if donald trump had run against bernie sanders in the twenty sixteen presidential election he might not have been able to pull off his victory we decided to ask the co to lily a young activist why he thinks that socialism is on the rise in the united states to people my age especially the really sick of you know the ills that capitalism brings upon if you look

so, social peace. at some point, for john rawls, if you have been given breaks and had a chance, you know, and you did not succeed, at some point it may be that you were a horse and buggy person in a jet age and so your technology just got away from you, but you should be able to adapt. that is what liberal arts education is all about. you learn all sides, you learn how to think and you can adapt to new technology. so you have done that, and then if you did not make it as well, you do not blame society. harder.have worked i could have been more honest, easier to get along with. the humble bit. the old self-examination. where did i go wrong? maybe there were missed opportunities, but maybe, possibly, it is possible that i am not perfect. so you want people who admit that they may be had something to do with their failure and they are humble and contrite, repentance. they say well, you know, i could've have done better. but i blew my savings and i did a lot of things i shouldn't have, and i ruined my hea

so, social peace.some point, for john rawls, if you have had a chance and then given a break and you did not succeed, at some point it may be that you were a horse and buggy person in a jet age and your technology got away from you but you should be able to adapt. that is what liberal arts education is all about. you learn how to think and you can adapt to new technology. you do not blame society. i could have been more honest. you do self-examination. where did i go wrong? maybe there were lost opportunities but maybe, just possibly, i am not perfect. so you want people who admit that they may be had something to do with their failure and they are humble and contrite, repentance. i could've have done better. i blew my savings i ruined my health and i did things i shouldn't have and i regret it now. now i am going to be hard-working and straight. that is the idea. the various critiques of rawls, one of them is that this race, to get up to the starting line, this is all done in public policy. one of the

a lack of parents overall social concerns about broader social issues.speaking compared to other countries like education. like making it more affordable to everyone. homelessness, it is here compared to other developed countries. imprisonment. >> we get it. we've got problems here. yeah. i think it is two different levels. how to address those problems. generations very on their larger political problems. much more in the 60s and drops in the 70s and 80s. now it certainly seems to be up. they are very concerned about rotter problems. they are very politically engaged. >> we are both very concerned about political polarization. in our experience in this weird position, there are people right, left and center. certainly libertarian who all agree and very passionately that we have an over incarceration problem. we really could come together on this. political polarization is actually making the case right now. >> an article in the new york times over the weekend. talking about how free play prepares people. prepares them in 1835 after is after his journey

i think the power of social media will drive social activism in the future. social activism and the dissemination that is matthew: i agree. i think it is really a good thing that athletes are recognizing -- like it or not, they are role models at all levels, not just professional levels. college, even high school. they get more attention than the average person, so individually and collectively speak out on important social issues is incredible. the real issue is not so much -- there is a little issue with the nfl anthem protesters, is this being disrespectful to the flag, is this suppression by the owners for people wanting to talk about something that is important? the real question is, what is the appropriate forum? there is going to be a lot of disagreement, but i think over 5-10 years, there will be by way of discussion some legal decisions as to this would be an appropriate forum, this would not be. as with social media, there are a variety of mediums that are out there and that is really where the issue is now. ,hat, all things considered this is appro

the head of the social democrats to write this letter and to renegotiate the deal. and there's a new poll out that suggest that the for the first time the. forwarded to second place ahead of the social democrats what do you make of that well that was that's always in the background those great numbers for the if the the polling situation because all the parties know particularly the social democrats if they would let a coalition collapse now in fresh elections the a if he could be the biggest winner so in a way that makes the social democrats. the hands are tied for them they wouldn't want to risk fresh elections. thanks very much. now to some other stories making news around the world pope francis has touched down in lithuania as he makes the first papal visit to the balkan states in nearly twenty five years he was greeted upon arrival by the country's president. they he'll celebrate mass and then visit a form of soviet k.g.b. prison where many women sentenced to hard labor. have you seen any of the u.s. deputy attorney general wrote rosenstein has denied a new yor

the head of the social democrats to write this letter and to renegotiate the deal. and there's a new poll out that suggest that the for the first time they have to have now crept forward into second place ahead of the social democrats what do you make of that well that was that's always in the background those great numbers for the d. the polling situation because all the parties know particularly the social democrats if they would lead a coalition collapse now in fresh elections the if he could be the biggest winner so in a way that makes the social democrats. the hands are tied for them they wouldn't want to risk fresh elections. thanks very much. germany's world famous october fest has begun in munich with the traditional tapping of the first barrel of beer. you. saw. the bruins served by the later known as a mass engine the celebration of beer drinking and varian culture last for two weeks. looks like a lot of fun and that's all we have time for we'll have more news for you at the top of the hour thanks for joining me. on. this work congress for two. months and

just because social media exists doesn't mean that your target client is on every social channel. first, really understand the demographics of each social channel. what client might be on facebook might not be on snapchat. know what social media channels you should put your energy into. >> it is changing. if you look at instagram, which is fast growing and you might have thought a younger base is creeping up. >> it is creeping up. but if you're appealing to the millennials and gen zer, they're more active on instagram and snapchat than on a facebook. >>> ignoring comments. this is an easy one, right? super easy. >> super easy. social media is being used for customer service more than ever. millennial conditi millennial consumers expect it more than ever. it's an experience. not a department. if you have a bad customer experience online, nine out of ten chances, they won't be a repeat customer. don't ignore the dms. get back to the comments within a 24-hour time frame. that experience of the client or the consumer is going to be way more pleasant and appreciated because we really j

she thinks social media is the main cause. all teenagers are into social media. one thing we learned a lot about because i think we'll have a common intuition that there's a pattern a pattern in the upper-middle-class especially prepared for college. there's two wonderful books we read. the miller go, what's the title of the book and the other is robert putnam's book. both wonderful books. they come to the same conclusion which is a pattern in middle class and above the what and above the wood to coal intensive parenting. the working classes more natural growth. teen. working-class kid has more free time but they're also coastal upper trauma when their kid. their trajectory is very different and in college now, our elite schools, which is where this is the most common, overwhelmingly as the kids of the top few%. working kids do come with different mental issues than the upper class. >> i do want to add to that. working i fired for years -- can anyone hear me, there's free speech issues on campus. for years when i wrote an op-ed for "the new york times" in 2012 i

media and not using social media anymore. and my older brothers friends qhor -- maybe have more in chon with gen-x now my question is do you have anything to say to gen-xers i feel the bigger abusers taking pictures of their family or family oriented which makes me happy. but do you have anything to say to your friends of your age who are promoting their -- family and their children to their friends to see? >> yeah i wrote a whole book about it, aaron. i'm trying to get their attention. and i also -- i have to confess the reason i wrote the book is because i do all of that stuff too. i don't pretend to be the of virtue here and it is a struggle but i think it is one that's worth -- struggling with maybe that's a fine place to end. i don't know. >> i think it is. i wanted to thank matthew hannity, thank you all for coming. the book is zero hour for gen-x. [applause] c-span to launch booktv 20 years ago on c-span2. and a since then, we've coveredded thousands of authors and book festivals including more than 30 events with supr

social drives are just that, giants. across so many different borders and they also go across and so borders and they also go across and so many different platforms —— social giants are just that, giants. it is tough to get the right level of regulation that works across territory and the different platforms. are they fighting a losing battle? we have said that facebook has said they have removed oi’ facebook has said they have removed or taken down something like 1.3 billion fake accounts, that's an enormous number. like you say, how do you police this and therefore, do we have to accept the fact there's manipulation and it can't be stopped? i think if you look at the different social media platforms as bad, platforms, then i think there has began element of responsibility in the user and that's where there's a sense of responsibility with every person along the chain —— as that. there's a responsibility for the user, the platforms and the brands and advertisers working on the platform as well. yes, there's an element o

let's turn to social media. we had a couple of folks show up to talk about their bias and what they were doing with russian meddling and frankly smart people, they seem to have a lot of trouble with the language. >> well, you know, they really do, lou, here is the part i love about it. speaking of anonymous things that have gone on today, yeah, they're saying, well, this happened for liberals too, well k -- can you name some, well, no, we are not going the name some. the reason i can name people and i can name organizations right now who i know were -- had this prejudice against and were censored and i will name them. algorithms were designed to specifically root out the conservatives and to blame it on the people who are hitting on the conservative sites was outrageous in my opinion. >> we heading toward regulations, arbiters of what is appropriate, what is the standard for discourse? >> well, i think the root of where we need to go is to determine who owns the content. first of all, they don't know whether the

and facebook right now is if i'm not mistaken in place number four when it comes to the amount of social media teens consume and actually instagram is the number two spot so instagram was really a key product in the portfolio to make sure that they could have that long term connection to users what does it mean for the company long term i mean you're saying it was it's still is pod of facebook isn't it oh definitely and i mean facebook's not going to go anywhere in the next couple years that they are the largest social media platform and will most likely remain however they are starting to hemorrhage users the growth has slowing down there isn't really as much hype as there used to be and it's because of those three things i talked about because of the demographic change because of the problems that are having politically and also just user skepticism and those are challenges they're going to have to find answers for moving forward or else you know they could go the way of my space is it going to have to reinvent itself somehow list's it disappears into a police vehicle was certainly goi

social media makes it a lot easier. that doesn't mean that we should say, okay, let's have social media have the don't police without restrictions or worries. because i do think that leads to bad results as well. but it does mean that we should recognize where these differences are important and how we might distinguish the kind of activities that we expect a social media company to be on the lookout for versus what we expect of a telephone which is a very different kind of service. >> guest: this is not hard. i think the line here is actually quite clear, and it's clear because the first amendment shows us how to think about these services. so isps, internet service providers, hold themselves out as providing connectivity to all or substantially all endpoints, right? and they've all said that they're going to abide by those basic no blocking, no throttling principles. and that's fundamentally why the d.c. circuit upheld the 2015 net neutrality rules. they said there wasn't and there couldn't be a first amendment proble

parts of america infused with socialism.ilitary, road, infrastructure. the entire new deal that helped build the middle class in this country. the weekend. come on, now, who doesn't love a weekend. who brought that into the american system. kennedy: lazy people, and in europe they have a month long weekend called august. that's why their productivity lags behind the united states. ned, it's interesting. people like jehmu make the point, we can have capitalism with nice parts but that's not necessarily socialism, is it? >> no, it's not. the reason we are having confusion i think our education system completely tried our young people will what socialism is all about. socialism actually ends up being about submission. i think we have got to go back into our education system and start teaching real such is, history and economics. this is how real economics actually work. i have to tell you, i wrote a piece called in search of americanism 6 years ago. we need to start talking about who we are as a people. how we got to this point

media we are talking about cyber bullying area we teach social studies, this is social life, in a 21st century this is part of the work we have to do. in terms of challenges, lack of resources. that is time and money. ditch rain, work, get resources to provide information train, work, get resources to provide information. there is a lot of confusion on the part of schools, is this my job are not? a lot of states are moving to clarify that cyber bullying, what is happening on campus is part of bullying policy, but there is a lot of ambiguity there, because there are a lot of issues with free speech area another issue is going back to the last 10 years what we have not solved, what is the definition of bullying? we heard a lot from dr. underwood talking about how a lot of things hurting our kids are not what we would objectively call bullying. if i were to bring this to a school official and say my kid is being cyber bullied, they would probably laugh and say, no, they were not intending to do harm and we cannot cover it under our policy. we had been approaching bullying in a disciplinar

it's not censorship. >> the president back in august centavos tweakers social street could social media is discriminating against republican and conservative voices, speaking loudly and clearly for the current administration. they're closing down the opinions of many people on the right while at the same time doing nothing to others. are conservatives being systematically discriminated against? >> a series of examples at the look in any detail, you see that those fall apart. >> i agree very strongly with berin and point out when the european union to the antitrust investigation into google and using its search engine to favor its products, whether you think that violated antitrust law or not, certainly they produce evidence that arguably showed google products are being disproportionately represented in the front end of the search page over those of rivals. not to get into the details of whether the antitrust action was warranted or appropriate, but there was evidence. when facebook and twitter have gone after russian bots, they have a list of criteria that they think these are why thes