solomi? i think that volodymyr would probably be more correct, he is from the profile committee, but also my answer to blitz, unfortunately, no, this is only the beginning, and it can only be used for those parishes or parishes that are very directly related to documents . more precisely, directly to the russian synod. thank you, ms. solomi. mr. volodymyr. i have a slightly different answer. the russian orthodox church will cease its activities because a separate article of the law clearly prohibits the activities of the russian orthodox church of ukraine. as for other organizations that are affiliated with it, the so-called uocmp, then for that it will be necessary to really conduct an examination, for that a court decision will be needed, all the necessary mechanisms for this religious organization to be dissolved. ties with moscow, or has ceased to exist, it is in the law, but we live in ukraine, we perfectly understand that the implementation of the law is possible under the conditions of

solomi, mr. volodymyr, how did this kurdish operation change its character? russian-ukrainian war, and how it affected, how, how it showed the current regime putin? well, first of all, it once again demonstrated the skill of the armed forces of ukraine, completely unexpectedly, and a large-scale and quick operation, which not only the russians, but also our allies did not expect from it. secondly, it really showed russia's inability to defend itself, because this is a really critical situation. for a country, when , for various reasons, the troops of a foreign country find themselves on the territory of the country, and such a critical situation, the country can either unite, or show a complete inability to unite, as in russia the following happened, exactly the second, that is, russia showed that even the direct threat of a foreign army on its territory is not capable of uniting this society that has been atomized by putin for decades, so it seems to me... that no matter how these events end, they will have such far-reaching consequences, and the third extre

solomi? i think so volodymyr would be, probably more correct, he is from the ruling committee, but also my answer blitz, unfortunately, no, this is only the beginning, and she can only offer for those. e parishes or parishes, which are very directly documented , are related, more precisely, directly to the russian synod. thank you, ms. solemiya, mr. volodymyr, i have a slightly different answer, the russian orthodox church should stop its activities, because a separate article of the law clearly states the prohibition of the activities of the russian orthodox church of ukraine. as for other organizations that affiliated with it, the so-called uocmp, for that it will be necessary to really conduct an examination, for that... a court decision will be needed, all the necessary mechanisms for this religious organization to either break ties with moscow or cease its existence, it is in the law, but we live in ukraine, we understand very well that the implementation of the law is possible under the

solomi, mr.odymyr, we remember this long history of creating anti-corruption bodies, and we remember that we have the most powerful legislation in... well, at least in europe, it is so precisely anti-corruption, why its application, and especially prejudice against corruption before by committing a crime, why not from it'. is happening in ukraine, why are there so many corruption scandals during the war? i absolutely agree with solomia that the current legislation is enough to fight corruption, i am absolutely sure that the thesis of equating corruption with state treason will do nothing to fight corruption, it is just a cool and populist slogan, there is nothing else, so i am not surprised , that there is no draft law, because it will not give anything, why during the war you can hear and see. so much corruption, and because the war is accelerating, because the war intensifies all those phenomena that already exist in society, that is, the war manifests what is in people, unfortunately, in some

solomi, mr.olodymyr, here's how did this kurdish operation change the nature of the russian-ukrainian war and how did it affect, how, how did it show the current regime of putin? well, first of all, she once again demonstrated the skill of the armed forces of ukraine, a completely unexpected and large-scale and fast operation, which she did not expect expected not only by the russians, but also by... the allies, secondly, it really showed russia's inability to defend itself, er, because it is really a critical situation for the country when, for various reasons , foreign troops are on the territory of the country countries, and such a critical situation can either unite the country or show a complete inability to unite, so the following happened in russia, exactly the second, that is, russia showed that even a direct threat to its foreign army. on its territory is not able to unite this atomized by putin for decades of society, so it seems to me that no matter how these events end, they will have

solomi, i think that volodymyr would probably be more correct, he is the right committee, but my answer is also blitz , unfortunately, no, this is only the beginning, and she can stop only for those parishes or parishes, which are very directly related to the documents... have more precisely a direct relation to the russian synod. thank you, ms. solemia, mr. volodymyr. i have a slightly different answer: the russian orthodox church will cease its activities, because a separate article of the law clearly prohibits the activities of the russian orthodox church of ukraine. as for other organizations that are affiliated with it, the so-called uocmp, for that it will be necessary to conduct an examination, for that a court decision will be required, all mechanisms are needed so that this religious organization... either breaks ties with moscow or ceases to exist, it is in the law, but we live in ukraine, we understand very well that the implementation of the law is possible under the condition of public pressure, observation of journalists , that's why we are watching together, we did everyt

solomi, but considering this, this and such a position in on the fundamental issue, these people's deputies of ukraine, whether can they now be called people's deputies of ukraine, isn't it time to ask questions about the existence or stay in the verkhovna rada of people who were elected on the lists of the same party, the opposition platform for life. which is already officially banned in ukraine, but deputies still pass laws or vote against laws, form the legislative field of the state, during the war representatives of this enemy party were and remain not only in the verkhovna rada, but also in local self-government bodies in 2020 for over 4 thousand deputies were elected from opzh, well, look and here, too, he is right, we need... when all this is published on the voting website, to see who was absent, without good reasons, who was present, but did not vote, that is why this infographic of the agency, unfortunately, is much wider, but as for formal name or not the name of these deputies, people's deputies, unfortunately, are the constitution of ukraine, which clearly states under what c