even though they still own msnbc prayer even though they seeing the but hall in new york at obama's som. [laughter] i don't think he is trying to enrich them but they just see the way the two make money in the world of obamanomics is to line up with government and what does that do? it sacks of entrepreneurs and that means you don't have jobs when you get out of college and thus one of the chosen few that it could go, microsoft, general electric, they will increasingly control more of the economy but that has a nazi fact of being bad on the whole economy. >> i don't know if the microphone can reach that far. [laughter] >> you mentioned earlier you felt the american people a being left out in favor of big government and big business. however believe specifically in terms of the ballet and the stimulus package of fire remember correctly were policies that the times of 40 of the majority of the american public. had the feel the government should address those issues when the majority of the people are supporting an initiative that you feel it in the end will damage them and give them the s

because there's been som real serious errors made re. >> ifill: yosay they weren't provided with th technology. doethat technology exist? >> yes, ds. anwhat we're talking about is bkscatter x-ray is the most prominent. it's being tested by the@ñ t, theransportation secity administration. d what it does, basilly, shows what is on the surface of the body a in yur pockets. i have heard some diurbing news the blogs, and i not sure its correct, but that the tsa had banned the dutch authoritiefrom using dy scanning technology at the rport. if this is true, thatis -- someone needto look really seriously w that happened >> ifill: thatirport in amsterdam. at you are saying whate have in place nowthe screeng process is just not adequate? >> oh, totally inadequate. younow, iheard on the ld-in that they were not oing checks at the now doing checks at t gate. unless you do aery trusive pat-down, i.e., you have toeel parts of the bodyhere people don't like to be touched , that's where peopl would hide the explosis. unless they do a pper search, i would call i a police search, e se event could happen tomorro

so i guess it's going to be crafted in a way that leaves some out and let's som out and . maybe somehow this is going to be crafted in way that we let 2 million 55-to 64-year-olds in and leaves the others out. my good friend from rhode island talked about the c.m.s. act weared and what he had to say. i wasn't prepared to come today and read every editorial out of the washington street journal, but had i, think it would have rebutted most of m what my colleague said. let me read a couple of quotes from the act washings the same one that senator white house talked about. it said, "the reid bill is especially likely to result in providers being unwilling to treat medicare and medicaid patients." unwilling to treat medicare and medicaid patients. in other words, not stealing the $464 billion. well, yeah, stealing the $464 billion is going to generate less interest by providers to see patients. well, there's only 60% of the doctors today seeing medicaid patients. there's about 74% seeing medicare patients. all of a sudden, you like your health insurance, you can keep your docto

som i know are going to want more time than others to comment on this.ity have to vote. we cannot vote by proxy for the nominee. i want to give a chance of a full opportunity to discuss the nomination in fall. what i am trying to do is put a five-minute time limit on it. i know people have more time than others to be heard. we come to a point where i am going to lose a quorum, then what i would do is set up a time whenever people would like to listen to the comments as to why they voted for or against the nominee. i am not going to do that now, but of some point today i have to move the nomination, and i do not want to spend all day on it, but i do not want to jam this through without people who want to be heard on the matter having a chance to do so. that is how i will proceed. i have very brief comments to make because during the ÑiÑiconfirmation hearing i exprs myself about the confirmation, but others have longer comments they want to make, and i will have to accommodate them. have longer comments they want to make on the nominee. and i'll be happy t

members, especially, some of those who are still kind of uncomfortable with the bill or want to make som changes who want the administration to say exactly where they stand on some of those differences, public option, employer mandate, do you expect there'll come a time and when, when the administration will do that and if not? why not? >> well, the administration has laid out some -- you know, has laid out our views on a whole variety of questions. there have been lots of people who have raised questions about, i suppose, the legislative strategy. but i would point out again, we are -- i mean, it's worth pausing. we are further along in getting comprehensive health reform than we have ever been before. and i'd also note -- i probably should have said this. from a cost containment perspective, if a year ago, november or december of last year, someone told you that a bill would be actively debated on the floor of the united states senate, that expanded coverage by more than 30 million, reduced the deficit, had a medicare commission in it and had an excise tax on high cost insurance plans

what guarantees do we have e o som be detained indefinitely here or somewhere os? attorin. eral the attorney general deciding is based on a firm oneviction and the values inherited from the american yort system and the trial could be held successfully in new york city. >> i think what concerns me the most is actually i think fullycision was not fully vested and thought out in of whe poten bt as of the potential rney'suences. i have no doubt as to what the attorney general's finalions are. andne is not the final judgments of the speak. se supreme court said you count thisfinitely detained somebody in this country and the question is if they are hey'vailabble for repatriation to their home tuntry, we keep them parks y poiet my point*. printer stand we did not get the letter yes. >> we on ald get it today. mugglicast question about human smuggling initiatives. was in the rio grande valley artelsly and selling me of the wire transfers to talk i'm y impre d somople but they tell me that we need additional adal legal resources. for example,, the of the of money transfers people c