SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
87
87
Jan 30, 2022
01/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 87
favorite 0
quote 0
once again, i think going forward because our expenses have actually gone up somuch , i wouldn't anticipate there being a fee reduction. i wouldn't anticipate that. >> so unclear, your analysis is that we have in the coffers right now to sustain what we have going forwardif we never did any changes , if we had no help there on the work order line item, we are two years, is that correct? >> if we don't do something about our expenditures and if our revenues don't go up past $57 million we're at about maybe this budgetcycle this year . >> okay. have you seen it before? >> i'm sorry, it's been a while since i've seen. >> that kind of reduction in the possibility, it's been a while since we've seen that kind of low revenue. i don'tremember everseeing that number before . >> the revenues are at fiscal year 1112 . so i think it's a combination of a variety of things. it's a combination of lower fees because even though we lowered our fees in 2015 16, if you filed a permit prior tothat , you still were able, we were still collecting issuance fees and those fees on thehigher fees . it's also based
once again, i think going forward because our expenses have actually gone up somuch , i wouldn't anticipate there being a fee reduction. i wouldn't anticipate that. >> so unclear, your analysis is that we have in the coffers right now to sustain what we have going forwardif we never did any changes , if we had no help there on the work order line item, we are two years, is that correct? >> if we don't do something about our expenditures and if our revenues don't go up past $57...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
79
79
Jan 1, 2022
01/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 79
favorite 0
quote 0
thank you somuch . >> president: thank you. chris? >> caller: chris strauss again. just saying my support the idea of continuing a virtual aspect to meetings but am very much looking forward to being back in person at board meetings and continuing advocacy with you all physically in the room. i just think it's a lot easier to do it in the room when you are able to see the microphone and see the timer that's onthe wall and see the people that you are talking to and have you all see the people you are. from . i think that would increase the advocacy that people feel capable of and it would increase their confidence that they are heard and that their comments are appreciated. i'd like to point out that i want a virtual version of our meetings at washington high school while the faculty meeting is happening in person for those members who have concerns about covid so iknow it's possible to run a hybrid meeting and if you need help i'm more than happy to help you figure that out . >> clerk: hello, tara. >> caller: i agree with continuing to run our virtual meetings and a
thank you somuch . >> president: thank you. chris? >> caller: chris strauss again. just saying my support the idea of continuing a virtual aspect to meetings but am very much looking forward to being back in person at board meetings and continuing advocacy with you all physically in the room. i just think it's a lot easier to do it in the room when you are able to see the microphone and see the timer that's onthe wall and see the people that you are talking to and have you all see...
42
42
Jan 21, 2022
01/22
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
when is the last time you had somebody on the federal level trying to give you somuch ?e. that's the answer to that question . i would say get ready, get prepared and let's get towork . we're out of here. >> all right, all right. i'm thinking our tradition of having many cabinet members today right now at this very moment it's my pleasure to introduce the attorney general of the united states guard. he has divided his practically whole career in the pursuit of justice. as a federal processor prosecutor for the us attorney's office in washington dc and department of justice where he served in both career and noncareer positions under five attorney general's. his responsibilities span the whole work of the department including civil, criminal and national security matters . notably he supervised investigations and prosecutions of national importance including the oklahoma city bombing, the unit water and cases. he served as judge of the united states courts of appeal for the district of columbia for 23 years and as chief judge for the last seven years he was on the bench.
when is the last time you had somebody on the federal level trying to give you somuch ?e. that's the answer to that question . i would say get ready, get prepared and let's get towork . we're out of here. >> all right, all right. i'm thinking our tradition of having many cabinet members today right now at this very moment it's my pleasure to introduce the attorney general of the united states guard. he has divided his practically whole career in the pursuit of justice. as a federal...
31
31
Jan 28, 2022
01/22
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
when is the last time you had somebody on the federal level trying to give you somuch ?e. that's the answer to that question . i would say get ready, get prepared and let's get towork . we're out of here. >> all right, all right. i'm thinking our tradition of having many cabinet members today right now at this very moment it's my pleasure to introduce the attorney general of the united states guard. he has divided his practically whole career in the pursuit of justice. as a federal processor prosecutor for the us attorney's office in washington dc and department of justice where he served in both career and noncareer positions under five attorney general's. his responsibilities span the whole work of the department including civil, criminal and national security matters . notably he supervised investigations and prosecutions of national importance including the oklahoma city bombing, the unit water and cases. he served as judge of the united states courts of appeal for the district of columbia for 23 years and as chief judge for the last seven years he was on the bench.
when is the last time you had somebody on the federal level trying to give you somuch ?e. that's the answer to that question . i would say get ready, get prepared and let's get towork . we're out of here. >> all right, all right. i'm thinking our tradition of having many cabinet members today right now at this very moment it's my pleasure to introduce the attorney general of the united states guard. he has divided his practically whole career in the pursuit of justice. as a federal...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
83
83
Jan 28, 2022
01/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 83
favorite 0
quote 0
once again, i think going forward because our expenses have actually gone up somuch , i wouldn't anticipate being a fee reduction. i wouldn't anticipate that. >> so unclear, your analysis is that we have in the coffers right now to sustain what we have going forwardif we never did any changes , if we had no help there on the work order line item, we are two years, is that correct? >> if we don't do something about our expenditures and if our revenues don't go up past $57 million we're at about maybe this budgetcycle this year . >> okay. have you seen it before? >> i'm sorry, it's been a while since i've seen. >> that kind of reduction in the possibility, it's been a while since we've seen that kind of low revenue. i don'tremember everseeing that number before . >> the revenues are at fiscal year 1112 . so i think it's a combination of a variety of things. it's a combination of lower fees because even though we lowered our fees in 2015 16, if you filed a permit prior tothat , you still were able, we were still collecting issuance fees and those fees on thehigher fees . it's also based on tha
once again, i think going forward because our expenses have actually gone up somuch , i wouldn't anticipate being a fee reduction. i wouldn't anticipate that. >> so unclear, your analysis is that we have in the coffers right now to sustain what we have going forwardif we never did any changes , if we had no help there on the work order line item, we are two years, is that correct? >> if we don't do something about our expenditures and if our revenues don't go up past $57 million...