we went over this at the beginning of the program so to come, should justice sonia sotomayor consider stepping down while biden is president and the democrats hold control of the senate by a thin margin. it's a radical idea, but given what happened been two rpgs, supreme court seat, does it make some sense? that's what i'm driving at with today is poll question. it's were kaddish.com go there and vote on this should a supreme court justice ever time their retirement so as to influence the selection of their successor, hey, by the way, i'm going to present what i call the mingle project monday june 17 on the island on long island, the john hangman theater in my social media are all the details i'd love to see you there if you work in spaceflight, this is the worst possible thing i can ever help >> my dad died doing what he >> spatial columbia have final flight from your sunday, april 7 at nine >> shake up your shower with the flavor for every feeling this dog progressions you up, this stub winds you down. this stub, the deep glowing and this keeps you going. so whatever care do you car

i thought we had more coming from sonia sotomayor, saying certainly in their deliberations and certainly crossing the line and can make for personal difficulties. >> amy coney barrett said this is a really transparent court, you understand their deliberations because you're able to read their decisions. but at the same time, she does acknowledge there is a lot out there that is not public that makes that the relationships that the justices have with each, so much to say how we live our lives in this country, it makes it all the more curious. what can you tell us, in your reporting, about what it's really like at the supreme court? >> i think it's very formal, very stylized, very ritualistic. as justice barrett said, it's like being in an arranged marriage with no possibility of divorce. you don't want to get cross-ways with people needlessly. you may have lost your vote in this one, but may need their vote in the next one. and there are conferences describing it sort of formal, and they ever and the conference, they do almost all of their communications in writing. partly because the cas

. >> imagine iffure your name is sonia sotomayor or brown jackson. should have voted the way you were expected to vote, not 9-0. you would you know divisions, they are professional at it. democrats are determined to keep trump off now a federal ballot. here is congressman jamie raskin. >> the supreme court punted and said it is up to congress to act. i am working with a number of colleagues, including maxine waters and swalwell to revive determining someone who commit the insurreksz is disqualified by section three of the 14th amendment. >> harris: lisa, eric swalwell will work on keeping trump off the ballot? >> lisa: i don't think democrats believe this narrative, they want to the means to justify the means. trump is so bad anything is justifiable to stop him from being president, removing him from the ballot and taking extreme measures and democrats want to decide the outcome of this election, not voters. it is up to voters to save the country. you had david axelrod say something similar, that is how elections work, should be in the hands of voter

court should not stop the law from taking effect the three liberal justices dissented justice sonia sotomayor writing, "the court gives a green light to a law that will upend the state bounds of political power and sow chaos. the ruling is a major blow to the biden administration which has argued immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility but texas officials, including governor greg abbott say they're taking actions because the government has not stopped migrants from crossing into the u.s when did you put up this wire? texas had already placed razor wire and buoys across the border to deter immigrants crossing illegally. a move challenged in court by the biden administration the governor telling us earlier this month that sb-4 did follow the constitution >> what the constitution does, it gives authority to states to be able to act when the federal government refuses to act. >> reporter: civil rights groups worry the law will lead to racial profiling today, the white house said, "we fundamentally disagree with the supreme court's order. sb-4 will not only make communities in texas le

they're going to become the next sonia sotomayors. this is a horrible moment but it won't last. >> you're talking about the potential political impacts and how this could force action on issues related to immigration policy, but morgan there's still this issue of logistics around what's happening at the border and this particular law, this idea from texas officials that this would allow them to take action to defend their state, but we know already when that sb-4 was allowed to go into effect by the supreme court for about nine hours yesterday, there was the confusion that you've already talked about. to we know if there were any arrests during that time and sort of what the process looks like? because i wonder, do we know where migrants who are arrested by local police or state officials would be held and would they just bypass the immigration courts altogether? what does that look like? >> reporter: yeah, ana, all great questions. we do know right now there's been no official reporting of any local law enforcement taking sb-4 into f

. ♪ announcer: now, supreme court justices sonia sotomayor and amy coney barrett.alk about the importance discussion hosted by the group icivics, which the late justice sandra day o'connor founded in 2009. this is just over one hour. >> welcome everybody. justices, it is so great to have you here to help celebrate civic learning week. to those of you who are tuning in our the first part of the day, this is in operating a full week of activity all around the united states to emphasize the centrality of civic learning at this time and the ability to govern ourselves in this democratic republic. we are so delighted to be joined here by justices sotomayor and barrett. they need no introduction, but i feel compelled to provide one nonetheless and to kind of add respect for their offices and for their achievements to share what we have here. so, justice sonia sotomayor , associate justice, was born in the bronx on june 25th, 1954. she earned a ba from princeton university, graduating summa, loudly, and receiving the highest academic honor presented to an undergraduate. i

nope, this time the so-called liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson in a concurring opinion basically told her cat there are colleagues quit while you're ahead, you have them at patchwork. >> see you? i did there. you're waiting for c. rozanna day where you were all trying to you we're leaning into your tv is going how is lara coates going to bring j. maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there was going to be some chaos if every state gets to decide whether trump can be on the ballot they got to have consistency. that's going to come from congress. they said, not the states. otherwise, you've got this will not a hilou, but patchwork that was as far as they wanted the court to go. but i mean, tell a baby not to cry the rest of them all. but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in

liberal justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson questioned the law's constitutionality and sow chaos. multiple law enforcement officials tell cbs news they're already short-staffed and don't have the training from the state in how to enforce the law. >> it's not like, oh, he looks illegal and we're going to put him in jail. we can't do that, you know. we can't stereotype someone, you know, someone from mexico and do that. >> reporter: and that potential for racial profiling across texas is what concerns migrant activists like dylan corbett. >> it's not just against recently arriving migrants, migrants who are coming to the border today, but this really goes after texans throughout the state. >> reporter: tonight the mexican government says it won't accept migrants that texas officials try to send back under the new law. campaigning here in nevada, president biden had no comment on the ruling. coincidentally, he's headed next to the border states of arizona and texas. norah. >> ed o'keefe, thank you very much. >>> today former trump white house adviser peter navarro became t

justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring, saying the decision protects donald trump from, quote, future controversy. cbs's robert costa has the former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president donald trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th >> you cannot take somebody out of a race. the voter can take a person out of the race very quickly, but i couldn't shouldn't be doing that. >> reporter: with this ruling, two other states also had their efforts to remove the former president stall. three justices in a separate concurring opinion said allowing the colorado measure to go forward would, we agree, create a chaotic state-by-state patchwork amid a tense political landscape. justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up

but what happened because of how broadly they swept is that the three liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson wrote about an oath-breaking insurrectionists. they incited that kind of a phrase, not specifically naming trump as one, but certainly the tone is there and straightened enough that justice barrett, when she wrote separately, even though she didn't agree with how far the majority was going, she said, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. we should be taking the temperature down rather than bringing it up but you can see why the liberals don't know by the way, does not believe in raises the temperature, will justices wanted to send a message? ditch that they this ruling was inevitable, you know, the colorado supreme court was really an outlier with what it did that under any scenario, the liberals did not want to go this far and give states this kind of power, but they did not want to have a really open-ended invitation for dominance. >> to that >> no, ellie and i were just the first sentence of what justices sotomayor kaga

liberal justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson questions the law's constitutionality andd it will upend the long-standing federal state balance of power and so chaos. but the moment multiple local loggers and officials till they are already short-staffed and don't have the training to enforce the law. appeared to be good is not illegal put them in general, we can't do that. we can't stereotype someone from mexico and do that. >> that potential for racial profiling cross texas is what concerns migrant activists like dylan corbett. >> it's not just against recently arrived migrants. migrants coming to the border. this really goes after texans throughout the state. >> reporter: tonight, the mexican government says it won't accept migrants that texas officials try to send back under the new law. campaigning here in nevada, president biden had no comment on the ruling. coincidentally, he is headed next to the border states of arizona and texas. norah? >> norah: ed o'keefe, thank you very much. today, former trump white house advisor peter navarro became the first person from t

but in a scathing dissent, joined by justice ketanji brown jackson, justice sonia sotomayor warned that the decision "invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement." sotomayor added, "this law will disrupt sensitive foreign relations, frustrate the protection of individuals fleeing persecution, and deter noncitizens from reporting abuse or trafficking." the ruling comes as federal migrant apprehensions across the southwest border reach an average of 4,200 daily, a sharp decline from the peak of nearly 11,000 in a single day back in december. so, now this case goes back to the u.s. court of appeals for the fifth circuit, with a nudge from some of the justices to move quickly, and that could mean this texas law could be back before the supreme court soon, perhaps within days. still, the white house tonight is saying that the court's order today will, quote, sow chaos and confusion at the border. david? >> david: but not over yet, as you point out. terry, thank you. >>> we turn now to that chilling case that made national headlines. a horrific racial attack in mississippi. to

la jueza sonia sotomayor, quien votó en contra, reaccionó enérgicamente así que esta decisión frustra, obstaculiza los esfuerzos federales y mina la capacidad de las agencias federales para detectar y monitorear y minentes amenazas de seguridad. a todos nos va a afectar hasta la gente americana, porque no se va a querer ir a trabajar y es cuando van a aumentar los precios en las tiendas. el gobernador abe, quien firmó la ley en diciembre, hoy en un tono de victoria, dijo que aún se tiene que celebrar la audiencia en la corte federal de apelaciones del quinto circuito, pero esto es claramente un desarrollo positivo. sus seguidores están de acuerdo. lo que necesitamos es enforzar las leyes de migración federales. la medida permita a los agentes de la ley arrestar a personas que se sospeche que entraron al país por texas de manera irregular. algunos departamento de policía como dallas dicen que la sb 4 no será su prioridad. nuestros residentes documentado un documentado que son respetuosos de la ley no tienen nada que tener temor en este departamento . nosotros tenemos que bregar con muc

on tuesday, supreme court justice sonia sotomayor criticized the texas law, writing in her dissent -- "this law will disrupt sensitive foreign relations, frustrate the protection of individuals fleeing persecution, hamper active federal enforcement efforts, undermine federal agencies' ability to detect and monitor imminent security threats, and deter noncitizens from reporting abuse or trafficking." authorities in mexico have also condemned the texas law. israel has carried out a number of deadly strikes in gaza over the past 24 hours. in gaza city, an israeli attack killed 24 people at the kuwait roundabout where palestinians had gathered to collect aid. meanwhile, an israeli attack on the nuseirat refugee camp has killed at least 27 palestinians. the official death toll in gaza is approaching 32,000. the world health organization warned tuesday many infants in gaza are on the "brink of death" due to the lack of food. a w.h.o. spokesperson said newborn babies are "simply dying because of low birth weight." the u.n. high commissioner for human rights volker turk said israel may be com

the atlantic published a piece this week calling on sonia sotomayor to retire this year arguing if sheill be making a bet that she will remain fit to serve until possibly age 78 or even 82. if she retires this year, president biden will 234078 nate a young and reliably liberal judge to replace her. the author even goes to point out that justice sotomayor is a diabetic and relatively poor health. carrie, does this surprise you because it shocks me. >> yeah. at this point i don't think we should be surprised but i agree. this is lower blow than i thought. especially for someone who is such a reliable liberal. they are doing things to suggest she ised in n. bad health. there is really no evidence. they are going out of their way. what it does show is the left is very concerned about the upcoming election. they don't trust president biden to be able to hold on for another four years. but i think it's in horrible taste that they are doing this kind of well you are no more useful to us, let's just push her off. just as they try to do with justice breyer. i think it's a horrible way to treat

joining me is melissa murray, a former clerk to sonia sotomayor or come and andrew wiseman, the generalounsel at the fbi. they are the co-authors of the branded number one, congratulations, new york time the seller -- new york times bestseller, "the trump indictments." what a great book. donald trump said crazy things, we don't have as much time as we would love to. andrew, you said nathan wade -- he resigned after friday, which means that fani willis can stay on the case . you said she should recuse herself. why do you think that? do you still think that ny? -- do you still think that and why? >> it is important to note what the judge said, the defendant, they were not prejudiced and are not prejudiced at all. meaning, he separated out this conflict issue from anything the defendant can complain about. important to remember that because this is two different stories. unfortunately, what affects the timing of the other. my biggest concern is not that fani willis needs to or required to recuse herself, i was trying to figure out where is this going to go from here. the judge invited the

. >> the three liberal justices dissented with justice sonia sotomayor warning the court gives a green to a lull that will upend the long-standing federal state balance of power and sew chaos. challenges to the law are not over at the justices sent the case back to a lower court. the newshour supreme court analyst marcia coyle has been following the decision and joins us now. the will allow texas to enforce for now the contentious new law that gives local police the authority to arrest migrants. how did the justices arrive at this ruling? >> first of all, it appears to be a 6-3 decision not to grant the biden administration a temporary pause on the law taking effect. the only one wrote in the majority was justice barrett and she was joined by justice kavanaugh. her bottom line seems to be it is premature for the supreme court to act on the administration's request at this time while the lower federal appellate court, the fifth circuit, still had before it the question of whether to pause the law while an appeal goes forward in the fifth circuit. >> this law goes into effect as the liti

elena kagan, sonia sotomayor, ketanji brown jackson agreed that states lack the authority, but that wasn't for the critics. >> the supreme court does it again, handing another major win to donald trump, allowing him to stay on the colorado ballot and is choosing to ugh e near the question at the heart of the cases which is whether trump is an insurrectionist under the 14th amendment. >> a lot of americans out there, their blood is boiling for what donald trump did on january 6th. they just think he's getting let off the hook scot free. >> the truth is, of course, these people don't trust the voter, and they don't much like the voters, at least not the 74 million who voted for trump. today we really saw their anger and their hatred consume them. howard: cassie, the anchors and commentators who said of course colorado and maine and illinois should be able to kick donald trump off the ballot under section three of the 14th amendment, how do they look now in the wake of this unanimous supreme court ruling? >> silly, unhinged, not cred credible. -- not credible. 9-0, when do you hear that in th

supreme court justice sonia sotomayor, in her dissent, warned the decision invites further chaos in crisis in immigration enforcement. it's not clear when the appeals court will rule after today's arguments. back to the desk. >> thank you. amanda. a warning about scammers pretending to be with the federal trade commission. the ftc says thieves are using the names of real agency employees trying to trick you. the agency says it will never contact you for money, tell you to move your money to protect it, tell you to buy gold bars or send you to a bitcoin atm. so if you get a call like this asking you to do any of those things, you need to report it to fraud. dot ftc.gov 5-10 this morning we have just patchy cloud cover out there. >> you can't see it from the exploratorium camera, but we have some around oakland this morning a little bit in napa and even santa rosa. but the cloud cover not nearly as expansive as it was this time yesterday. looking at your weather and health today, air quality is good. we're breathing easy. however allergy sufferers, your tree pollen is high. the main offender

and frankly, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, and sonia sotomayor, should be standing up and screamingabsolute disgusting abuse of power. and let me make this clear for the non lawyers out there. because i have -- the one lawyer who's here. i'm explaining this, i'm on campus right. it's like explaining this case to my students today. and they are literally saying well, why is this taking so long? this isn't that complicated. i literally had to show them a video from lethal weapon to about a diplomatic immunity to explain how silly presidential immunity is. this is not complicated. it is very clear, that we have an absolutely corrupted supreme court. that at least three of the judges have financial dealings that we can't explain. gorsuch, kavanaugh, and clarence thomas. and rather than the court demonstrating that the only audience that matters is the american people, they have shown that the only audience that matters is republicans. that is the problem with this. it's not complicated, it doesn't require a lot of legalese. they are stalling in order to allow donald trump to get into th

justices sonia sotomayor ketanji brown, jackson, and elena kagan. and i'll just read briefly from their descent because the majority itself did not explain itself. it just had an order that said that texas can enforce this two justices on the right. did concur in that. i'll get to that in a second. but i just wanted to explain what the dissenters road they said today, the court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens in explicitly instructs it its state courts to disregard ongoing federal immigration proceedings that law appends federal state balance of power that has existed for over a century. that's what justices sotomayor and jackson road and then justice kagan wrote separately, the subject of immigration generally and the entry and removal of noncitizens particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government that's that's kinda the crux of the argument, even though this is playing out in such human terms at the bor

joining us now, former law clerk to judge sonia sotomayor, melissa murray.o still with us, rick wilson. i want to ask you about donald trump and the court cases and what we should expect to come. >> we can expect a whole lot of waiting. the court issued their decision in the disqualification case, and this was hailed as a unanimous decision. there was a roiling dissent from the three liberal justices who argued their brethren had gone too far, deciding issues that weren't actually before the court, and so that means at least going forward into the april 25th oral arguments on the immunity case, we have a court that's sort of ribboned with disagreement over donald trump, and at least one portion of the court believing that the other side is somewhat in the bag for donald trump, doing their level best to make it easier for him to proceed to the general election. >> we have the immunity arguments now scheduled for april 25th. what should we expect in those arguments? what questions from the justices are you going to be listening carefully for? >> it's hard to s

supreme court justice sonia sotomayor, in her dissent, warned the decision invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. it's not clear when the appeals court will rule after today's arguments. back to the desk. >> thank you. amanda. still ahead, neighbors in vallejo concerned about the growing unhoused population in their community. but officials say they can't do much about it. >> the ferris wheel of fisherman's wharf may be there longer than expected. mayor london breed suggestion 608 this morning we are enjoying mild sunshine today, dry conditions tomorrow and then our rain chances do ramp up dramatically starting on friday and they stay elevated through part of the weekend. >> we'll talk about the r a honey baked ham that's been slow smoked, hand glazed, and spiral sliced. or, a kelly baked ham. nobody wants a kelly baked meal, not even kelly. every bite is a celebration with the honey baked ham company. oak, cedar and pine trees. your uv index today is at five. that is moderate temperature wise. future weather showing you bright conditions early on. today. by 10

of reproductive freedom for all, and also tiffany are right, a former law clerk for justice, sonia sotomayor for being here just to be clear, and people are thinking, well, this is not the dobbs case, this is not truly whether to think that abortion can be legal or not or illegal. this is about access to abortion medication. but maybe for wondering why the justices even took a case like this. >> what's your thought >> well, i think in dobbs, you remember the line where they said that this was just a neutral opinion. we're returning the issue back to the people and their elected representatives. and every time abortion access has been on the ballot since then, abortion access has one. and so now what we see is not a fight over whether or not it should be legal or return to that neutral position. but whether or not women can have access to the drug that most women used to end early pregnancies. and so i think that this was a secondary attack on the right of women to exercise bodily autonomy. and they took it in order to test whether or not that access will remain available. >> many i mean, the

melissa murray, professor of law at nyu, who clerked for justice sonia sotomayor before she ascendedte for law, justice, and reproductive rights. she testified before congressional committees about roe v. wade and against the nomination of then-judge kavanaugh. >> confirming judge kavanaugh to the supreme court would threaten people's ability to make fundamental personal decisions, including deciding whether to have an abortion. make no mistake about it, a vote for judge kavanaugh is a vote against roe. >> and we're joined by andrew weissman, lead prosecutor from the mueller probe. you see him there, younger but not wiser. melissa and andrew have teamed up to write the new book i mentioned you may have heard about. you see it on your screen. you can google, amazon, or local bookstore, type into your internet browser, "the trump indictments: the historic charging documents with commentary." that is their legal commentary. i wanted to shoutout a worth while project. >> thank you so much. >> absolutely. why are you doing this, andrew? >> as you know, we're about to head into the new yor

>> you know, justice sonia sotomayor invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement.right about now, is a buzz word, if you will. a lot of republican elected officials in congress like to talk about it. but again, there's a bill on the table that, you know, elected officials have just voted for republicans rejected because donald trump told them to do so. do you agree with justice sotomayor? and what are the solutions here? because this can't be it? >> i agree with justice sotomayor. she pointed out that this would create chaos. it would create potentially 50 different versions of how you enforce the immigration law. and would make the federal government's job in processing people and keeping track of folks and determining who should be here and who shouldn't, that much harder. it would create more confusion than order. so i think she's right. and the legislation -- look. i disagreed with part of the legislation that was compromised legislation. but it did have some good things in there. especially more resources for these southern counties, whether they're in califor

even though justice amy coney barrett and sonia sotomayor, love to talk about how they share candy and movie nights, there's bad blood behinds scenes. and the liberal judges have not been able to shake a compromise out of the majority. >> he says in a news letter last week, i argued the supreme court's recent decision on diversity in high school admissions offered a reason for americans to be less cynical about the court. on that subject, the justices seem to be following a consistent principle across several cases. sometimes that principle disappointed the political left. sometimes it disappointed the right. last week's decision feels different. when urgent action could help a republican presidential candidate in 2000, the court which was dominated by republican appointee the at the time, acted urgently. when delay seems to help a presidential candidate, court has chosen delay. the combination does not make the court look independent from partisan politics. i think we should focus on what he says about look. it doesn't make the court look independent. even if they are independent, the

we talked about the metadata from justice sonia sotomayor's concurrence seems to begin as a dissent.about the process by which this opinion was reached. it seems that one big google talk and everything adds to it. that is part of why you ended up with metadata being available for us to see that perhaps this should have remained as dissent. >> it is like writing a document with a bunch of people . exactly as you said, google docs. they are trying to get- obviously, i do not know who is running the show. i appreciate -- assume it was chief justice roberts. they want is money to join the majority opinion as possible. you take suggestions from people. the justices will say, i do not like this language, could you change that? at the same time, the opinions can move around. different people may change their views over the course of time. at the what happened here as there was an majority opinion that explicitly said that congress, only by legislation can enforce the 14th amendment section 3. not just the states cannot do it, but that congress cannot even do it when it counts electoral vote

listen to justice sonia sotomayor. >> i have such a problem with your brief, senator. it didn't happen to. i don't know what to make of all of this because you have a -- i'm not sure how we get to prove direct injury in any way. >> the justices seem skeptical of the idea that by alerting social media companies to disinformation, the government was somehow coercing them. they didn't see the evidence for that. and they said there should be a place for government officials to go to platforms and talk about harmful content as long as they weren't, again, using their powers to coerce these companies because that would violate the first amendment, but the justices weren't seeing that. anna. >> ken dilanian, again, today's arguments, we'll wait for an actual decision on this issue. but it's an important one. appreciate you. >>> still ahead, a new way for americans to buy and sell homes that could save you a good amount of money. we'll explain when yasmin vossoughian picks up our coverage right after this. thanks for staying there. tayinge get the new iphone 15 pro with tons o

justices sonia sotomayor and ketanji brown jackson said this today, the court invites further chaos and crisis and immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens and explicitly instructs its state courts to disregard any ongoing federal immigration proceedings. the law appends federal state balance of power that has existed for over a century. and then the third liberal joining in was justice elena kagan, who said the subject of immigration generally, and the entry and removal of noncitizens that's particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government. and that's the point here. briana you're looking at all the human drama at the border right now with those pictures and we've just seen so much turmoil as migrants have tried to make their way to america across the river there. but what this is about at this point is essentially state powers versus federal powers. and as it said, it's been for more than a century that the federal government has had control of immigration. and this is the first time a

i want you to answer because you've been a law clerk for the supreme court, justice sonia sotomayor we know supreme court justices are known for the dictum, the things they are supposed to address, and then the rest they're actually wanting to address. there was some dictum here in the sense that he got went beyond just the ruling in this case, he could have just said, you're not disqualified. and nathan wade has to go are you have to go he went into professionalism and beyond. was that inappropriate to you or appropriate? >> there was a lot of diktat here and there's always this debate about when dicta is appropriate and when it's not i thought some of it. the comments about her professionalism. i thought that maybe that was fair game. i think actually calling out the election was to me seemed a bit inappropriate. this is a legal opinion. it's not a place to explicitly in both politics and this way that part. i thought when a little bit too far, but there was certainly a lot of dicta that did not have any legal weight >> tiffany, right? always a pleasure to have you on. thank you so m

chaos of the federal courts were creating, we're adding to that and our first latina justice sonia sotomayor said something that was joined by justice ketanji brown, jackson. she said the court invites further chaos and crisis in an immigration enforcement texas up ends the federal-state balance of power that has existed for over a century in which the national government has had exclusive authority over entry and removal of noncitizens. this is the key part. this is what this all comes down to, is who's responsible and for age she does, of course, it has been the domain of the federal government but as i mentioned, john, i wanted to just refer briefly to the little word we did get from two of the justices in the conservative dominated majority yesterday, justices amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh referred to the unusual procedural posture that this case was in. and just as they wrote i think it unwise to invite emergency litigation in this court about whether a court of appeals abused its discretion at this preliminary step that essentially john was a signal to the fifth circuit to go b

justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson take issue with the rulings broadness, which they suggest is to quote insulate this court and petitioner from future controversy. the petitioner, of course, being donald trump, has for him, he praised the ruling, then pivoted to the courts. next big decision on presidential immunity when you make a decision, you don't want to have your opposing party or opponent, or even somebody that just thinks you're wrong, >> bring a criminal suit against you or any kind of a suit when you leave well, since i have that right now, at a level that nobody's ever seen before, i have rogue prosecutors and i have rogue judges have judges that are out of control and it's a very unfair thing for me >> keeping them honest. there is, of course, no evidence of rogue prosecutors or judges, no matter how many times he says that there are colorado secretary of state, jenna griswold also weighing in a bit earlier here on cnn first and foremost, i'm glad that they issued a decision colorado voters and american voters all across the country deserve to

they are the chief justice of the united states, john roberts, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, who are the three democratic appointees on the bench. and then, in addition to them, neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh, who were two of donald trump's three justices appointed to the supreme court. it is obviously typical for the supreme court to come. not every justice is there. amy coney barrett, clarence thomas and samuel alito are not there. clarence thomas has not been there, has not attended the state of the union since 2006. casey, remind our viewers who see the sea of white of congressional women. yes. democrats in the house and senate, why? they are all wearing white. >> it's about reproductive rights. and that, of course, has become a the central issue. frankly, the democrats want to promote for all of the discussions that we're having around this table about the president's challenges on immigration and the economy, democrats are going to plan to answer those challenges with abortion. i mean, that is going to be something that we are going to be hearing over a

right there in between john roberts, the chief justice, and sonia sotomayor, behind them. that's justice kennedy, anthony kennedy, who resigned from the supreme court. i believe he was replaced by was it brett kavanaugh who took his place and so that that is it's interesting, i suppose, as with jorge santos, he still enjoys privileges not to compare justice kennedy and congressman santos, but they are both formers. there we see, lisa murkowski and susan collins, both of whom in the last couple of weeks endorsed, nikki haley talking to, lindsey graham. >> yes. who did not endorse nikki haley. he is still with with donald trump. i just to go back to something that john king was mentioning earlier about the debate and things that are important. a number of centrist, democratic sources and frankly, moderate republican sources who want biden to win over trump said to me this afternoon, he better talk about crime. he better talk about immigration and the border. they see these as just along with reproductive rights, a critical message. >> and again, this is where you get this de

sonia sotomayor, elana kagan and ketanji brown jackson said the majority improperly decided novel constitutionalons this court and trump from future controversy. this case, crying out for judicial restraint, it abandoned thattices said of the majority. amy coney barrett wrote the court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a presidential election. particularly in this circumstance, relying on the court to turn the national -- to turn the temperature down not up. there was also jenna griswold on monday. here are her comets. >> i would sayod the court issued the decision. americans have been voting across the nation in early voting and in those super tuesday states here in colorado. in colorado, the americans deserve to know whether trump is a qualified candidate. my larger reaction is disappointment. i do believe that states should be able, under our constitution, to bar oath insurrectionists. ultimately, this leaves open the door for congress uthorizing legislation. we know that congress is at nearly -- a nearly nonfunctioning body. ultimately, it will be up to the sa

escuchar el discurso sobre el estado de la nación john roberts, clarence thomas, samuel alito, sonia sotomayorlquier momento estará llegando ya el presidente. están con nosotros para profundizar sobre las expectativas. todo lo que se espera del mensaje del presidente joe biden, el analista republicano de noticias telemundo, alfonso aguilar y el analista demócrata, ex subdirectora de comunicación de la casa blanca en el gobierno de biden, pili tovar. a los 2, muchas gracias por estar con nosotros. gracias por estar contigo. gracias decíamos es una noche como como ocurre cada año, un presidente que tiene que dar el discurso sobre el estado de la nación, pero también es distinto, hay más expectativa sobre el presidente joe biden, porque también estamos en medio de un proceso electoral. pili qué tiene que hacer joe biden hoy para tener una buena noche? brevemente el presidente tiene que demostrar que tiene la fuerza para poder seguir liderando, lo cual lo sabemos, que la tiene, pero creo que que tiene que demostrárselo al pueblo estadounidense y hacer el caso de por qué necesita otros 4 años. por

sonia sotomayor, ela kagan and ketanji brown jackson said the majority improperly decided novel constitutionalcase, crying out for judicial restraint, it abandoned thatouamy coney barrett wrote te court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile particularly in this circumstance, relying on the court to turn the national -- to turn the temperature down not up. there was also jenna griswold on monday. here are her comets. >> i would say it's good the court issued the decision. americans have been voting across the nation in early voting and in those super tuesday states, here in colorado. in colorado, the americans deserve to know whether trump is a qualified candidate. my larger■s reaction is disappointment. i do believe that states should be able, under our constitution, to bar oath breaking insurrectionists. ultimately, this leaves open the door for congress to pass authozing legislation. we know that congress is at nearly -- a nearly nonfunctioning body. ultimately, it will be up to the american voters to save our democracy in november. host: this was a unanimous decision and i

there is justice sonia sotomayor and amy coney barrett at a panel discussion from last week from tuesdayg together about the court and about law. you can read that story in today's "washington post." this is james in alabama, good morning. caller: good morning. just wanted to say real quick, i think it would be worse only if they were born after 1980. i believe that the generations after 1980 were indoctrinated, not educated. think about it -- i am surprised you are able to ask this question because you are using the word women, and now we have half of the democratic women don't know how to define what a woman is. and then the people that sit down in front of congress from that generation think that a man can get pregnant. that is all i got to say. host: one more stat from that gallup report, this wrecks down respondents by pitical party -- this breaks down by political party. do you think the government would be better with more women in office? for those who say yes, 80 4% of democrats said yes, 54% of independents say the country would be better off, and just 32% republicans say the c