concepts of the origins of art, which should be beautiful even in its dirt, like dostoevsky’s sonya marmeladova i unfortunately didn’t watch, i started watching the beginning, i started watching the beginning, i’m no longer that there was just no time why, because we discussed this topic, i, well, how could it to be related to art from the point of view of cinematography, it plays there well... maybe it doesn’t relate very much yes, but that’s how you like it, this is dirty beautiful, it should be perfect, that’s the guy’s word, it’s just now a phenomenon of the russian-speaking space , a phenomenon, true, and this one needs to learn how to create such phenomena, i just want to say, in addition to sergei mikhailovich, that after aristotle the aesthetics changed a little, in addition to the categories. a work of art, although one opponent said that i shouldn’t confuse it, supposedly there is mass culture, and art is something else, i say again that everything there is done according to the highest standard, you know? starting from the work of a producer, the work of a director, it is already dif