listen when they're having their little meetings when sonya sotomayor gets on television. we are talking about women's bodies and women's rights. ok so you have a body, you have rights whether you want an abortion or not. it has nothing to do with running this country. ok? we have women all of this country including our politicians who are running on emotions. host: point taken. let's let kelly respond to that comment. caller: i would make the clear point that women do not run this country. women are underrepresented on every level. the folks are leading the majority of states, the majority of state legislatures, the presidency, the supreme court, those are all majority men and in most cases majority white men. if the concern is this country is being led by emotion we should look to those are actually making the decisions most often. remember that women are not in majority of those positions. i would add is really easy-to-follow into gender stereotypes and paint all women with the same brush. to say all women are acting only on emotion is very consistent with the tropes an

he had a diatribe against sonya sotomayor. if you think that members of congress and their families are not nervous now being out on the trail, obviously, they are. by the way, newsmax host greg kelly tweeted: wondering if nancy pelosi staged her own mini january 6th. excuse me? her husband underwent surgery for a fractured skull. kelly later deleted that tweet. >>> ahead, elon musk has taken over twitter. some in the media savaging him once again. but when we come back, we'll tell you which pundits pretended that john fetterman's shaky debate performance never even happened. ♪ ♪ ♪ well, the stock is bubbling in the pot ♪ ♪ just till they taste what we've got ♪ ♪ ow, ow ♪ ♪ with a big, fresh carrot ♪ ♪ and a whole lot of cheese ♪ ♪ and the mirror from your van is halfway down the street ♪ ♪ well, you can say that -- ♪ wait, what? i said, "someone just clipped the side view mirror right off the delivery van." when owning a small business gets real, progressive gets you right back to living the dream. now, where were we? why, yo

listen when they're having their little meetings when sonya sotomayor gets on television.ing about women's bodies and women's rights. ok so you have a body, you have rights whether you want an abortion or not. it has nothing to do with running this country. ok? we have women all of this country including our politicians who are running on emotions. host: point taken. let's let kelly respond to that comment. caller: i would make the clear point that women do not run this country. women are underrepresented on every level. the folks are leading the majority of states, the majority of state legislatures, the presidency, the supreme court, those are all majority men and in most cases majority white men. if the concern is this country is being led by emotion we should look to those are actually making the decisions most often. remember that women are not in majority of those positions. i would add is really easy-to-follow into gender stereotypes and paint all women with the same brush. to say all women are acting only on emotion is very consistent with the tropes and biases tha

in a way, she reminded me of justice sowing us on a mayor when she's -- sonya so to mayor -- sotomayornds me of the legislative history and congress's intent hind the statute that was befe the court. judy: josh, what was your take? josh: she was certainly very vocal. she may have spoken and questioned more than any other justice at least during that first section of the arguments. she was very well-informed. she reminded me a little bit of her predecessor, justice breyer, in this question she cap bringing up about congressional purpose and congressional intent but there was no question she intended to come out of the gate very strong to indicate that she is not going to be some sort of shrinking violet on the court. judy: she wasn't holding back. let's talk about what the case was today. it was about the clean water act. in a nutshell, what was the argument? what is the significance? marcia: it is very significant because of how the justices to decide what kind of test to use to determine whether wetlands are part of the waters of the united states can really affect how broadly the cle