let's have a chat to sophie lucas who is from the solicitors firm duncan lewis. yourfirm represented six claimants in this case. first of all, what can you tell us about those claimants?— all, what can you tell us about those claimants? our clients, some of them are — those claimants? our clients, some of them are survivors _ those claimants? our clients, some of them are survivors of _ those claimants? our clients, some of them are survivors of torture, - of them are survivors of torture, trafficking. they are incredibly vulnerable, some of them are from countries such as syria, iran. these are clients who came to the uk to seek refuge and had been living in fearfor over seek refuge and had been living in fear for over a seek refuge and had been living in fearfor over a year now, seek refuge and had been living in fear for over a year now, not knowing what their future holds and whether the government will try to remove them to rwanda. you whether the government will try to remove them to rwanda. you listen to the judgment — remove them to rwanda. you listen to t

sophie lucas represents several clients who are at risk of deportation. torture, of trafficking, they've fled war—torn countries. they have been living in limbo, many of them, since may last year. so the repercussions of tomorrow's decision will be felt very strongly by them and many others in the uk who came to seek refuge. which brings us to the allegations made by suella braverman in her letter this evening. she says the european court of human rights' rule 39 would mean even if the government wins tomorrow, it could mean months of delay, as claimants can use interim orders to appeal the decision. some lawyers agree with the former home secretary that the government could have legislated more firmly to prevent this and make clear it would ignore rule 39 in future. but others argue this year's illegal migration act does give the government the power to ignore rule 39, meaning migrants could be deported within weeks, though it could be a breach of international law to do this. it is by no means certain that the european court would reconsider the case if