it’s good that the british did not demand that sosanj pay for six police escort cars and a helicoptersed price of electricity in his prison cell, or for the security of the ecuadorian embassy in london, where he was imprisoned from 2012 to 2019. to say almost 5.00 km, everything is relative, as is 12 years of life locked up in england versus several life sentences in the usa. and about what is happening in american prisons, the world thanks to osanju, i learned that among the thousands of documents published in wikileaks about the atrocities of american security forces, there is evidence of torture in their prisons. in order not to repeat the fate of the heroes with their journalistic work and gain freedom, in the case of the united states against julian asandge. the journalist was required to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to obtain and disclose classified us national defense documents. he admitted guilt. 5 years in the english belmarsh maximum security prison, where he was kept in a solitary cell 2x3 m without the guilty verdict was credited to him. until yesterday, the us

well, in the case with sosanj, of course, we all saw hypocrisy, first of all, the hypocrisy of westernmorning to evening that someone is sitting in that country, someone is sitting in that country, that’s a person . they seized the truth, which means they illegally broke into a diplomatic institution in order to seize it, they are keeping them in prison for many long years... imprisonment, and we do not see a single award, not a single award, not a single concern, they word, no one said anything about assange, who is talking about awards, this is of course very clear regarding what is happening, it is very important, where are the merits of this person in connection with the kind of resonance his investigations caused, of course, all human rights organizations should have stood up on the contrary for this man, who never had to ride around the world for a day, is a lie. and hypocrisy, this is their motto, which we saw first of all from this case, the second point, but it is clear that asansh is already, including for reasons, due to his condition health, he could not stay in these inhum

clinton who is and the clinton family is the main enemy, that is, the source of adversity with the sosanjhe loses a lot of votes, he disappoints the left-wing youth, who will not go to vote for donald fredovich trump, but these are the guys who will stay at home, they will not vote for biden, and biden needs to score points among them, very politically technological the question is if biden is willing to do this, make these deals and pretend that he is doing it. he will simply be destroyed, and the republican will be called a weakling, a coward who spent 100 billion american dollars taxpayers. lost to russia here there is one more nuance one more nuance remember barack obama said that he would close guantanamo, the guantanamo is still working, but why? congress allocates money, the money must be spent, the united states is a very bureaucratic power, money has been allocated for ukraine, it must be spent, so he can’t do anything, it’s possible, because biden didn’t make money on this and no one made money, it’s impossible from ukraine, because they all make money from this, partly, partly

the biden administration's sosanj deal, a miscarriage of justice that dishonors the service and sacrifice of our military members and their families. there should be no court deals that allow anyone who would jeopardize the security of senior military personnel or the nation to avoid prison. safety. the us tried to prosecute him under the us espionage act. in 2013 , another key defendant, former pentagon employee bradley manning, was sentenced to 35 years in the same case. it was he who conveyed secret information to asanj. in prison, mening changed his gender, gave his name as chelsea , and received a pardon from barack obama in 2017. the founder of wikileaks remained a man and did not change his convictions. and even despite the deal with the american authorities. plea of ​​guilty in exchange for freedom in court julian sanche made it clear that he did not repent, but only had to agree with the terms offered to him, the washington post newspaper quoted him as saying during the meeting, where he referred to the first amendment to the us constitution, which protects freedom of speech. i a