sotomer our steps to unlock and ensure the stable operation of the grain corridor, in our cooperation, we have moved to a new higher level, the level of the ukraine nato council , and this mechanism may work. we can safely overcome the crisis in the black sea we can overcome the fourth i want to thank all the countries that this week adopted new decisions in support of our state our people our military all citizens the republic of korea announced an increase in aid to ukraine thank you azerbaijan humanitarian aid in the field of energy and demining thank you sweden approved a program to help our recovery strategy until the 27th year thank you very much an agreement was signed in japan by the world bank and ukraine on a loan of 1.5 billion dollars sub-guaranteed by japan thank you austral and canada great britain, the united states, sanctions, sanctions against persons associated with aggression. thank you . soldiers of the 15th brigade of operational assignment named after heroes of ukraine bohdana, for you, a very powerful russian word destroys the south of our country, for whom, guy

sotom >> -- [inaudible] the ninth t holds, and make some sense to me that the collateral should be ousted or -- not that the party is usin reverse the act decision, but that definition does not sit with eldridge. i think i could be wr, if i could say so correctly, that it completely?ridge dealt with >> matthew v. eldridge dealt with cific thought pattern with indiviad been receiving social security benefits wformed that they were informed thatth relevant agency consider them to be no longer toled and therefore their benefits would be terminated and the specific complaint in matthrsus aldridge was my benefits were terminated before i received a hearing. they will entitled to hearing down the road and they could get retroactive if it's if their benefits were terminated and then at the of the day they were bound to be entitled, but thld be an interruption of the stream of benefits, ae court said, that is sufficiently collateral to the overall proceedings that you don't have to use the review mechanism that you use after your benefits claim was finally resolved. but i th that case really has