let's bring in parenting expert, ericka souter. do we say to our kids now. >> there are kids who are excited about the outcome but are confused by the anger that's still there and there are kids that are devastated by the outcome. it's really important for parents to acknowledge their feelings but, it's also very important that they make sure their kids feel safe. little kids need to know that the world is not going to end and we're ultimately there to protect them from what's happening outside the house. >> what do you do if you're in a marriage where you and your spouse disagree about who's going to win. >> families don't always agree. i'd like to a tone from president obama's recent activity at the white house. he was very graceful when he invited donald trump there. we can teach our kids that despite their differences you can have tolerance. that's a very important value. to be tolerant of other people and views. >> okay, speaking of tolerance, have a president-elect who's on the record saying pretty harsh things about his poli

selections absent consultation, then his nominees may enjoy my support as did justices kennedy and souter." outside of the judicial, grassley's legislative record shows strong support for renewable energies like ethanol and bio-diesel. he championed wind energy tax credits, helping make iowa a national leader in the industry. "i didn't have the slightest generating 31% of our electricity from wind." that's just a taste of the senator's experience on capitol hill. it all began in 1975 when a 41-year-old grassley became one of iowa's u-s representatives. the now 83-year-old would be near 90 at the end of another term. critics have questioned his health. grassley's response... "i ran three miles this morning, i'd invite you to come with me and you can draw your own conclusions." polls have shown the senator with a commanding lead over judge, 18 points according to the latest polls. officials at quinnipiac university say grassley is headed toward an "easy win", with 95% of the gop vote and a 26-point edge among the crucial independents. be sure to stay with t-v nine and kcrg dot com on electi

i think it's much the same that happened with justice souter and stevens stepping down. i guess you were what justice thomas might actually be perfectly happy to stay on the site in the next couple years especially if he is confident his successor will be some who shares many of these commitments. i did any of the three justices asked me to lead by choice between now and 2020 election. >> of what surprised me greatly if justice thomas would step down voluntarily spent let's test that. you say if the court if you does political, it's authority diminishes. yet the justices do when they leave voluntarily seem to make an effort to lead under a president who shares their worldview. isn't that in cuny a political motive to the court's? >> it is to the justice but, i don't want, i would help folks don't get me say that the court out -- that the cortisone of a political. that's not what we know are what we should hope to be true. it shouldn't be beholden to political process. that has been the transistor at that's what is in jeopardy. are the politics behind the decisions of jus

there's this expression of the souter factor.k a lot of people in the trump administration do not want to risk another david souter, who will prove more moderate or liberal, depending on your perspective, after he is confirmed. >> in fact, they don't want somebody like john roberts, either. and john roberts is very conservative, but he committed the cardinal sin in the view of many conservatives, and that is, he voted to uphold the aca, the affordable care act. >> and -- >> i think where i would slightly disagree with nina, which i try not to, is there are people on the list which i think have great potential. i wouldn't say that president obama selected intellectual leaders. i'm not saying he didn't select good justices. but justice sotomayor was not on the top of any list, nor was justice kagan. they're very qualified and i don't see the difference between president obama and president trump and there are people on that trump list, that are very substantial minds and reliable substantial minds and reliable conservatives. >> the

i think it's much the same that happened with justice souter and stevens stepping down.guess you were what justice thomas might actually be perfectly happy to stay on the site in the next couple years especially if he is confident his successor will be some who shares many of these commitments. i did any of the three justices asked me to believe by choice between now and 2020 election. >> of what surprised me greatly if justice thomas would step down voluntarily spent let's test that. you say if the court if you does political, it's authority diminishes. yet the justices do when they leave voluntarily seem to make an effort to lead under a president who shares their worldview. isn't that in cuny a political motive to the court's? >> it is to the justice but, i don't want, i would help folks don't get me say that the court out -- that the cortisone of a political. that's not what we know are what we should hope to be true. it shouldn't be beholden to political process. that has been the transistor at that's what is in jeopardy. are the politics behind the decisions of jus

selections absent consultation, then his nominees may enjoy my support as did justices kennedy and souter." outside of the judicial, grassley's legislative record shows strong support for renewable energies like ethanol and bio-diesel. he championed wind energy tax credits, helping make iowa a na industry. "i didn't have the slightest idea in 1992, when i got that passed, that we'd be generating 31% of our electricity from wind." that's just a taste of the senator's experience on capitol h 41-year-old grassley became one of iowa's u-s representatives. the now 83-year-old would be near 90 at the end of another term. critics have questioned his health. grassley's response... "i ran three miles this morning, i'd invite you to come with me and you can draw your own conclusions." polls have shown the senator with a commanding lead over judge, 18 points according to the latest polls. officials at quinnipiac university say grassley is headed toward an "easy win", with 95% of the gop vote and a 26-point dedication, u-s soldiers and veterans depend on their community. now hy-vee stores are asking

selections absent consultation, then his nominees may enjoy my support as did justices kennedy and souter." outside of the judicial, grassley's legislative record shows strong support for renewable energies like ethanol and bio-diesel. iowa a national leader in the industry. "i didn't have the slightest idea in 1992, when i got that passed, that we'd be generating 31% of our electricity from wind." that's just a taste of the senator's experience on capitol hill. it all began in 1975 when a 41-year-old grassley became one of iowa's u-s representatives. the now 83-year-old would be near 90 at the end of another term. critics have questioned his health. grassley's response... "i ran three miles this morning, i'd invite you to come with me and you can draw your own conclusions." with a commanding lead over judge, 18 points according to the latest polls. officials at quinnipiac university say grassley is headed toward an "easy win", with 95% of the gop vote and a 26-point edge among the crucial ten million dollar advertising boost from a super pac and a new ad set to debut today. with this lat

the no more justice souter care is a law of weight and is right that for years people have said they just so to overturn roe v wade and that did not happen but i am quite aware of that but right now is a much more sophisticated conservative legal movement nominating area myers illustrates that. it used to be that the technology and the internet explains this but there is a big factor but basically we know what we are doing is not something the conservatives will accept any more. >> i would say very briefly a world where john roberts is a very different from where we are today. . .

he cites the papers to make his point congress cannot do that and to reject justice souter's argument that come enduring of executive branch officials were permissible. the federalist papers were never voted on by the philadelphia convention. they would never vote on by the state conventions. they were written after votes in several state conventions. the same argument that's been made, the constitutional argument has been made against legislative history to be made against the federalist papers and elliot's debates and all the pamphlets and other writings that were written at the time of the constitutions creation and ratification. i think the same can be made with respect to treaties. in medellin versus texas, involving whether president bush can order the state courts to reopen certain criminal cases, chief justice roberts declared the court traditionally looked at text, background, negotiating and drafting history, namely the practices of the nation-states. justice scalia holy join this opinion. in fact, this made sense because chief justice roberts was quoting and citing that jus

and you can argue that souter blackman, and kennedy are somewhat surprising in small ways, but if you all are as predicted and i'm sure donald trump's people will do a very good scrub on their people to make sure there are no surprises. >> jeff toobin and professor turley, thank you so much. appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> up next, it's not just drump's old -- donald trump's oldest children who he turns to advice, he turns to advice, there's also jared kushner, his son-in-law, ivanka trump's husband. we'll look at how he could become one of the most influential people in the trump white house. and like any skill, credit is a skill. you have to learn to walk before you can run. getting the experian app for free is a great place to start. it gives you access to your experian credit report alerts about changes in your credit... and customer service support to help answer your questions. so you can learn to be better. start building your credit skills today for free. download the experian app right now. experian®. be better at credit. like their photo claims tool. it helps settle your cl

and you can argue that souter and kennedy are somewhat surprising in small ways, but if you look at theing on the court, all are as predicted and i'm sure donald trump's people will do a very good scrub on their people to make sure there are no surprises. >> jeff toobin and professor turley, thank you so much. appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> up next, it's not just donald trump's oldest chirp who he turns to advice, there's also jared kushner, his son-in-law, ivanka trump's husband. we'll look at how he could become one of the most influential people in the trump white house. l is for loving the seasonal cuisine. a is for access to everything, including the aisle. r is for reclining in tailor-made bedding. and i, must be dreaming. s... so long, jet lag. polaris, from united. ... 83% try to eat healthy. yet up 90% fall short in getting key nutrients from food alone. let's do more. add one a day women's gummies. complete with key nutrients we may need... ...plus it supports bone health with calcium and vitamin d. one a day vitacraves gummies. coaching means making tough choices. jim! you'

some years ago, a court that i really enjoyed being on was the one, with justice souter, o'connor, and stevens. we were together along time. one of the things that one of my colleagues with whom i rarely agreed said that the planets are consistent. whether it is based on or around free in basketball you want to call it the same way. call it the same way for both sides and you can live with it. justice thomas: he never said he agreed. mr. malcolm: i want to talk about certain provisions, sentences -- substantive decisions. you said the constitution is not a stand-alone document. that it can only be properly understood in combination with the declaration of independence. justice thomas: my point was that we have to understand -- this is what i was trying to answer in the mid-1980's. while this government, wasn't something else. government by consent, inalienable rights, what were we protecting was the structure in our constitution. i think when you look at the constitution, which is a positive document with a declaration as a back drop you understand why this republic, why is separation

us a little ways on the next supreme court justice -- it does not have to be a liberal, but david souter -- and since he does not care about these issues, and everything is a negotiation, the -- and everything's the potential for a deal, i worry about his reliability on these things. and i hope to god i am proven wrong, but that is -- he is a lifelong democrat from new york who likes to cut deals. and that, again -- i know i am a broken record on this -- requires very good signaling from the right about the deals he can get away with and the deals that he cannot. the relationship that the conservatives have now with donald trump is much more reminiscent of the nixon administration, which is fitting, because he is surrounded with a lot of nixonion language. solid majority, and the rest. richard nixon hated the right wing. i read this a lot. we also knew he had to deal with them. honeymoon isce the over, conservatives need to be set up in a situation where he has to deal with us to get our approval on the important things. that will leave it at because we saved some time for audience quest

we're joined by ericka souter, the editor of mom.me. most important tool? >> it's not high-tech. not an app. not in the latest parenting book. it's good old-fashioned conversations with your kid. frequent conversations. we prep for the sex talk. plan for it. the same needs to be said of the tech talk with your kids. they need to know expectations. how to be good people, good wrong. this is not -- these apps are great. it's not a set it and forget it. nothing replaces good parenting. >> if you're a teen, it's not too late. >> it's about setting expectations. day need to know that you care and you're monitoring what they're doing. >> i remember my parents, they were not just concerned with their children. but our friends as well. is that good advice? >> absolutely. it does take a village you need to mon nor what your kid is doing, what their friends are doing. their behaviors influence each other. >> we're just getting started. this was a real eye opener. we have more of the cracking the kid code this week. with whether you should secretly monitor your child's cell phone. >>> comin

we're joined by ericka souter, the editor of mom.me. most important tool? a parent can use? >> it's not high-tech. not an app. and you're not going to find it in the latest parenting book. it's good old-fashioned conversations with your kid. frequent conversations. i look at it this way. we prep for the sex talk. we plan for it. the same needs to be said of the tech talk with your kids. they need to know expectations. they need know that there are things that they can do that are wrong. this is not -- these apps are great. it's not a set it and forget it. nothing replaces good parenting. >> i like that. tech talk along with the sex talk. if you're a teen, it's not too late. you can still talk with your kids about this. >> it's about setting expectations. they need to know that you care and you're monitoring what they're doing. >> i remember my parents, they were not just concerned with their chil. r kids safe online.e to keep you need to monitor what your kid is doing, what their friends are doing. their behaviors influence each other. >> we're just getting started. this was

they are still able to say this lower court judges justice o'connor and justice souter. no they cannot be redesignated as supreme court justices. they resign the office and that office is filled so you'd have to go through the whole process again. >> at the risk of being -- for a moment i do think congress could by statute provide that in the event of a lack of a full bench a retired sort of statutorily retired supreme court justice by designation to provide which is how number of supreme court's filled open seats either with retired or lower court judges. i don't think they would have to be reconfirmed from the post of retired justice. congress would have to authorize them to do it. >> do you think congress could do that with respect to already retired justices or would that change be effective only with respect to those appointed to the office of justice later on? >> imagine the constitutional argument and that constitutional arguments differing in those two cases. my own personal view is that would be within congress's power to still provide it but i think we agree th

and ginsburg, stephens at the time and souter. and the dissnts was justice breyer from the left and justice roberts, scalia from the right. we also have from the court the decision in laurela tobacco. most relevant, it struck down a ban on billboard advertising of tobacco. that basically made it impossible to advertise tobacco in virtually any area in this particular jurisdiction -- or -- let's say a wide range of areas. the rationale was, you put to a billboard as opposed to the pages of some adult magazine. some magazine aimed at adults and lots of kids can see it. say, well, yeah, maybe lots of kids can see it but lots of adults can see it. you can't restrict the speech available to adults, at least in any very broad way, simply to shield children. that's a principle the c.a.r.ou developed before. it applied it to commercial advertising. that's an important point because a lot of the kinds of advertise -- restrictions in advertising to children that i've sign, whether it has to do with food or whether it has to do with violent

. >> we're going to bring in ericka souter, editor at mom.me. it is apparent they've worked it out and other couples can learn from it. >> ryan and reese are a good example. they've been able to put their kids' needs above their own and co-parenting isn't easy and requires a lot of communication, empathy and patience. but, you know, what we found that when we talked to couples, to make it work, number one, they plan ahead and create a schedule. you don't want to wait on the holidays. they also set rules and boundaries, not just for the kids but for the adults. that means you don't cancel last minute and that the kids follow the same rules at both houses and lastly they stay positive. you don't want to complain or be angry in front of the kids and want the whole thing to feel comfortable for everyone if you can. >> i like number two how set rules not just for the kids but adults, as well. ericka, what about when there's extended families involved and how does that work out? time aside for them to see them. but it's trickier when you talk about gi

what was interesting, even souter said the federalist papers should be given great weight in the analysis of the case. this case dealt with having state officials who would be required to carry out federal functions or duties. so what happened was this wonderful exchange. quite frankly scalia, in my view, got the better of the exchange as to what was meant by this structure. it was scalia who would often talk about the dual sovereignty of federalism. this concrete notion of the relationship of the federal government to the states. and that sense of clarity, that formalistic approach was also evident in morrison as just discussed. not going to discuss it further since it was just discussed by john. but in that case, simply note that once again when he answered the question, which he said that opinion was one of his most difficult, he went back to the federalist papers and quoted federalist 51, when said, the weight of legislative authority requires it should be thus divided, the weakness of the speculative may require, on the other hand, that it be fortified. so he was very conscious of th

became the most liberal supreme court chief justice in the modern era to john paul stevens and david souterndly disappointed the president. dagen: how about the current chief justice john roberts? >> also largely a disappointment at the manner in which your team is lucky not to us, and by looking up the method of judging. not the perception of politics, but the method of judging is so refreshing to see that. >> are you going to read those robes or go? >> aware that when i come to the interview. dagen: are just on a conversation so exciting. it's always so great to see you. thank you for being here, judge andrew napolitano. go read some of scalia's opinions. they are just like the most exciting thing. >> never a dull moment. dagen: particularly with u2, judge. tense moments outside the philippines. but you need to know after an explosive device was detonated at the u.s. embassy. with the holiday travel season underway. one of the nation's biggest airports. the latest at chicago's o'hare airport getting ready to strike. the g new cars. you're smart. you already knew that. but it's also great

over the desk back over the past 30 or 40 years, you see justices like sandra day o'connor and david souterltimately backed abortion arets, even justices who generally conservative people, like chief justice john roberts, who badly disappointed conservatives by voting twice to uphold the core of obamacare. donald trump will be hearing from an awful lot of conservative legal thinkers, conservatives who want to make sure that this is a rocksolid conservative who donald trump nominates to the court. >> on those nominations, trump has a list of 21 prospective supreme court justices. take us through some of the names. >> well, we know more about some of them than others. one name to watch for is a guy named william pryor, a very outspoken judge, very conservative. called -- he has called roe versus wade one of the worst abominations of the country. you would expect a vocal fight with democrats over him. about have been talking is a michigan supreme court justice, she has only been on that court for about a year. you talk to conservatives and they say, she has a lot of firepower. she is an up and

and ginsburg, stephens at the time and souter. and the dissnts was justice breyer from the left and justice roberts, scalia from the right. we also have from the court the decision in laurela tobacco. most relevant, it struck down a ban on billboard advertising of tobacco. that basically made it impossible to advertise tobacco in virtually any area in this particular jurisdiction -- or -- let's say a wide range of areas. the rationale was, you put to a billboard as opposed to the pages of some adult magazine. some magazine aimed at adults and lots of kids can see it. say, well, yeah, maybe lots of kids can see it but lots of adults can see it. you can't restrict the speech available to adults, at least in any very broad way, simply to shield children. that's a principle the c.a.r.ou developed before. it applied it to commercial advertising. that's an important point because a lot of the kinds of advertise -- restrictions in advertising to children that i've sign, whether it has to do with food or whether it has to do with violent