but i spent a huge portion of my time on the south china sea and i am greatly concerned about the p.r.c.'s use of tactics in the south china sea that are at odds with international law. for a long time, the p.r.c. has no claim to cling to. and since 1999. that we face the situation over the course of last year and from spring into early summer and escalation was extraordinarily high because the p.r.c. was willing to interdict phillipines supplies. they engaged in some diplomacy with the p.r.c. to stabilize that hot spot. and brings it to bear and we have seen it bring pressure vietnam and p.r.c. [indiscernible] in many ways and you know this well, i started my career running a program related to maritime transparency which is a superb program. p.r.c. capabilities are meeting p.r.c. interests when it is able to use coercion and have its way in the south china sea. and demonstrate that the p.r.c. can get its way. it's very difficult in going go about it's lawful operations. there is a lot we can continue to do not only to stand up for our allies of the phillipines but to support all of th

let's take the south china sea. look at the behavior of china, china coast guard, maritime militia as well as pla navy with this imaginary dash line. yes, the map has a history to it but the lines don't have any meaning in contemporary international law. >> they don't. >> and yet that's what they are trying to enforce on the philippines, on vietnam and other states, and so we can say, okay, it's just taiwan but it's not just taiwan. throughout their entire maritime region intruding on their neighbors and imposing their domestic view and their historical claims approach to international law and on japan as well. how do we negotiate with a country that's going to use sort of -- use historical claims rather than international law to discuss international law? >> that is a big challenge. i think europeans missed a bit of a chance and i've been arguing in my home country denmark as well, the fact that there was a ruling, arbitration ruling that basically legally came out and said that the chinese came to a void according

trade front, i'm going to put pressure on you on the diplomatic front, and that's includes the south china sea, human rights issues, which china is often lambasted though, but when it comes to shame jane obviously accused over lots of cyber crime to, i mean there are other ways that china can get back at the us, but it's not off the hook in any way when it comes to these issues being raised either through trades all through politics. yeah. of course, china is going to reach out to you what we saw in 2020, when you know the, the incoming presumably incoming secretary of state, marco rubio, is a senator sponsored that we are forced labor protection at to very tough stances against china. when it came to hong kong and they sanctioned marco rubio, mario rubio, his thunder sanctions by the chinese government. and so they certainly have taken action in result of us action or counter action. and you're going to expect to see more of it is, is you just said you're going to have retaliation. i'm terrorist, of course, when it comes from china up to the us. and you may see export controls on chinese good

so let's just take the south china sea. look at the behavior of china, china coast guard, maritime militia, as well as the pla navy, with this imaginary dash line. i mean, yes, the map has a history to it, but the lines don't have any meaning in contemporary international law. and yet that's what they're trying to enforce on the philippines, on vietnam and other states. and so we can say, okay, it's just taiwan, but it's not just taiwan. they are, throughout their entire maritime region, intruding on their neighbors and imposing their domestic view and historical claims approach to international law. >> japan, as well. >> and on japan, as well. how do we negotiate with a country that's going to use their sort of -- use historical claims rather than international law to discuss international law? >> that is a big challenge. i think europeans there missed a bit of a chance, and i've been arguing that in denmark, as well. the fact that there was a ruling in 2016, an arbitration ruling initiated by the philippines that basically

and i think we see this in its actions in response to the united states and china in the south china sea so there have been various skirmishes and clashes, in the economic zone and the united states has actually offered operational support in the south china sea which the philippines has turned down. another thing that came to light earlier this week is that we hosted the indo-pacific commander at brookings and he clarified that of the four additional enhanced defense cooperation agreement sites that were offered to the united states last year, a sign of stronger relations between the u.s., to the security relations between the united states and philippines of those four, these four are currently still used by humanitarian operations rather than military operations, so, i think that the philippines has been quite careful in its approach towards the united states and china. in terms of opportunities, that's a little bit harder to glean, but if we want to look at the silver lining behind every cloud, one might say that although mr. trump is often accused of being disdainful to alliances an

blows) >> smith: a key strategy for increasing china's might is expanding chinese control of the south china seat shipping lanes in the world. japan and korea completely depend on it. so, it's no small matter who controls this waterway. and china, in effect, is saying, "everything from the straits of malacca, up around taiwan, to the chinese coast is ours." >> these are waters through which one-third of the world's maritime trade flows. what china did to actually effect that claim was to commit a lot of ecological destruction, to build up these, these man-made islands. >> smith: the same year that xi became predent, china began building artificial islands on top of seven coral reefs in the south china sea. the manmade islands covered almost five square miles. >> and so they dredge coral reefs to build up islands, and then claim that these islands, you know, were just for research purposes, environmental research purposes. and then, of course, landing strips appeared, and then fortifications appeared, and then missile batteries appeared. >> (speaking mandarin): >> smith: xi has repeatedly pledged

land, maritime cord, or between asia and latin america. experts say many countries in the global south sea china as the most favorable trading partner. then the us for your, at the 4 countries in a lot in american south america that depend so heavily on exports the defense so heavily on placing our goods in the world market. and it seems to me that it china's role in promoting free trade and then promoting more director. this is extremely important. or the pulse is expected to handle 1000000 containers in its foster corporations and reduce travel time between lots in america and asia. by nearly 2 weeks. it's something that is about a local peruvian entrepreneur to export soft choice to china, says will benefit hop business. we're through, we're very excited that the chinese government, this investment improve i think, to add china believe in the lives and what we have the pool is expected to generate around 2000 new jobs by next year. but chan cause may doubts that the economic rewards will trickle down to benefit the entire community. lanita is stop wasting, therefore, the focus is on the part,

the pivotal event is the conflict over disputed reese in south china sea. and now we have a standoff between the chinese coast guard and the filipino ne, they have been pushed by the us to, to the front of confrontation with china. but it hasn't been has a big improve and not very effective because the chinese coast guard to have bigger ships that have bigger water cannons. um, so this is where us things, okay, well maybe if we deploy us coast guard too. so i'll try to see that it's not a strictly military conflict, per se, because that's you're trying to avoid a hot direct cotton war. they're just trying to create change that has nothing to do is us. this is a, this is a bi lateral dispute with the china and the philippines when us. so send it or the nancy pelosi visited tie. one with china has done it was way for her to leave. and then they start military exercise all over tie one which they haven't done doing a lot very long time. and if us do choose to directly involved in the dispute, is i was trying to see you wouldn't expect china be a lot more forcef

on this spray with president trump, the president said he would do the issue of the south china sea. was he specifically referring to a deal that indonesia signed a few days ago in beijing that could be read as a de facto validation of china's nine daiish line that -- dash line that marks its claims in the south china sea and how concerned is the administration about this? karine: we continue to encourage indonesia to make sure any agreement they make with the p.r.c. is according with international law, especially the u.n. convention on the law of the sea. i don't have anything beyond that. i read out at the top more broadly what they were hoping to accomplish, what they were going to talk about. you just mentioned indo-pacific and china sea. as it relates to this particular deal that was signed with indonesia and beijing, we are just going to continue to encourage that. that they really work with their legal experts. reporter: is that a statement that the administration believes that indonesia is not complying, that the agreement -- karine: i don't have anything beyond that. reporter

commitment, which is ironclad, to defend the philippines, our ally from any chinese threats in the south china seas a huge question for u.s. allies in the region, japan, south korea and the philippines, as they counter china and chinese aggression in the south china sea. if we look back, trump did not build regional alliances during his first term. more than anything, he expected allies hosting u.s. troops to pay more for that security. it is unclear where he stands on taiwan. what xi jinping wants is to establish china as this alternative center of power. they are working hard here to portray america as an unreliable friend in the region. if trump's america first policies distance the u.s. further from allies like the philippines, china is going to stand to benefit a lot. >> janis mackey frayer, thank you so much. >>> joining us now is ben rhodes, the former deputy national security advisor in the obama administration. picking up that thread, ben, if donald trump were to carry out his campaign pledge on 60% tariffs on all chinese goods, which most economists have said is basically a tax on americ

essentially the united states and what we face with the rising threat of china, and taiwan, in the south china seathe wargames show we have run out of ammunition in a week or two in a fight with china. david: for the u.s. to keep up with changes on the battlefield, it will need more than just new equipment and new technology. it will need to reform the way it procures that equipment and technology, making it more streamlined than what the pentagon does today. amy: i think there is widespread agreement that the procurement process is desperately in need of modernization and revamping. the procurement process is good at something. it is not good at rapidly developing and fielding capability. david: those trying to do the innovating agree that the process badly needs reform. andy lowery is the ceo of epirus, a defense tech company based south of los angeles. he's working on a system to protect against drones like those used so effectively in ukraine. andy: aircraft, tanks, cars, vehicles, stadiums, refineries, borders. all of these things right now are falling prey to an infiltration of drones. not j

condemns the people's republic of china's aggressive action against the philippine vessels in the south china sea. this provocation maneuvers threaten the peace and stability of the region and violates international law. we stand in full support of the philippine sovereignty over the territorial waters and call on china to respect the rights of all nations in the south china sea. i urge my colleagues to join me in supporting house resolution 837 and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentlewoman is recognized. ms. manning: mr. speaker, i rise in strong support of h.res. 837, which reaffirms the vital partnership between the united states and the philippines. i want to thank delegate moylan and representative bobby scott for bringing forward this important and timely resolution. the relationship between our two democracies is more than just a longstanding alliance. it is a cornerstone for stability in the indo-pacific region. over the past year, beijing has persistently and illegally bullied the philippines in the south china sea. the chinese coa

fairly quickly so it will be off show and or friday be spending in the will more because of the south china sea sons are. so japan, korea, almost all of china. there is a finger of rain stretching out from me and across the united to the south west of china, which is the system that had to admit and then all cheryl's reforming and coming back into was this part of eastern china engine. you still have open water by this time i will be weakening policy and trust gone, but we have an ice circulation here, which means have you raising is lucky, young girl and beyond. and then with warnings in place for carla tunnel now to possibly start anchor as well. that's where the rain will be. of course, for the rest of india, which should be now settled, spelled for months on end system as you know for north indian fighting and a good part of northern packaged on a call to is a big issue. if he's portland, i haven't, i for the whole, it will stay almost hazardous and the climate has changed every year for millions of years, decades of talk, but little action. it's all about distract, create confusion to crea

the good news is, it's worked this way pretty quickly on my date into the south china sea. it's expected to move, move towards high nan island, taking that width and when the weather close to 7 pots of china, by the mid week. elsewhere across the region was still sing some heavy rain for much of malaysia and indonesia, the west of that, affecting northern parts of borneo. and through night, by tuesday and big bus rain have affected the south east of australia. thanks to a cold front that's pulling across the southeast. that's expected to bring some relief to the bush fires burning in victoria, the cool things down. and you can see that range starting to move towards brisbin, stretching across queensland and into the top and on the northern parts of w a. down in the south, it is a story overheat. temperatures are expected to come down in pub and we could see some west. so whether here to stop the weak light rain on monday the . ringback the, the, [000:00:00;00] the missing out is there a mind default told stories this hour up to 15, palestinians have been killed, biased or an

and i think we see this in its actions in response to the united states and china in the south china sea so there have been various skirmishes and clashes, in the economic zone and the united states has actually offered operational support in the south china sea which the philippines has turned down. another thing that came to light earlier this week is that we hosted the indo-pacific commander at brookings and he clarified that of the four additional enhanced defense cooperation agreement sites that were offered to the united states last year, a sign of stronger relations between the u.s., to the security relations between the united states and philippines of those four, these four are currently still used by humanitarian operations rather than military operations, so, i think that the philippines has been quite careful in its approach towards the united states and china. in terms of opportunities, that's a little bit harder to glean, but if we want to look at the silver lining behind every cloud, one might say that although mr. trump is often accused of being disdainful to alliances an

don't least around the south china sea. how do you think a new trump administration will respond to china is increasingly assertive actions in the region. it says the relationship between the aging and washington is likely to be very fraud going forward. but um trump seems to be in favor of creating was he's less, he's more cautious of perhaps less fav favorable towards your actual hot conflicts . so in that sense, where from stands in terms of the so i try to see tie one that he's trying to see is a little bit up of yet he could get advisors would who push them to be a lot tougher. you could also have a case where he is asking and demonic ball from these partners and allies in the region in order for the us to do more. but i do want to sort of copy up all of that by saying badging today is slightly different from the badging of 2016. the very powerful they are very rich. however, they were using economic headwinds. so the options available to beijing maybe somewhat different than what we saw in the previous comp to north ko

. >> want to talk about china because what we've seen in the east china sea with china which is president for going back to the south sea years ago, you start with fishing boats. you move up to the maritime patrols et cetera before you know it gets territory is taken over by china. in this case it's somewhat different that involves a a yh treaty ally in the philippines. how is u.s. acting to prevent and we don't see the same outcome there that we see in the south china sea which is there able to develop these unsinkable aircraft characters as they say in the island? >> our approach to this challenge starts with one of the fundamental tenets of this administration's foreign policy, which is strengthening our alliance relationships in the indo-pacific, including relationships with the philippines. beyond that by the way really fundamentally including upgrading our partnership with all of the asean countries, with countries like vietnam who sort strategic orientation in the world is now contested by a range of other countries. i i think his increasing looking to the united states as an economic partner and baby ultimat

in the south china sea, it's coast guards, barriers to best buy from the philippines, and it's being threatening taiwan with air and navy trends. either of these flash points could start a war. the drags in the us. there is a risk and a growing risk of a use of force by china, either in the south china sea or in the taiwan strait. we know the front of the us intelligence community that senior tech has told his military that it must have the capabilities to type type one by force in 2027. trump does not want that to happen while he's in charge. he has said time and again, he's going to prevent scores from happening and that was what happened under his watch he's. that's where he criticized joe biden. i think that resonated with the american public. so the us military will need to did tough. she, tim, paying for making moves on taiwan or the philippines and help us has a problem. a really big problem. to explain that, let's take a look at a map on china is east coast. there's a little island, just off shanghai. this is where you find that young man shipyard, which is a jewel use civili

in the south china sea china is threatening japan is that okay to?ng the philippines and threatening australia. was like the 1930s all over again. you sow is happening in amsterdam and i will tell you where is the outcry by our leaders in the united states? fight it would put out a statement but where are all the leaders? they are chasing jews in the streets in europe. we have been there before. just as jews were chased in the streets of new york, in london, the chief a rabbi and francis says there's not going to be one jew left in france in 10 years. the jews are the canary in the coal mine. do you think these forces, you think they will be done? are they done abusing the jews are they ever done? these are the same people who hate the west. the same people who hate america. us, we the people. the clouds are forming. right in front of your eyes. but it no head in the sand because europe is looking at the 1930s. the axis of evil has formed. russia, china, north korea and iran are working with each other that they are exchanging intelligence with each

largest economies is complicated and profit with difficulties from territorial disputes in the south china sea, beijing's military expansion, and in direct support for russia's war against ukraine to charges of chinese cyber espionage. and of course trade complex, joe biden and changing thing, don't agree on one thing and that is that the world is entering a period of uncertainty and change. she calls it of turbulence. and with the next us president modeling to impose high tariffs on many countries. but especially on china, she is positioning himself as a global leader of interest, independence and unity as opposed to unilateralism and protection is a good morning. members of a peg represent nearly 60 percent of the world's g d p. and our uncertain about their relationship with trump, this time round about this, i'm hoping somebody, ma'am. you see all we know that during his 1st administration, he despised multilateralism, preferred transaction, and negotiations, carrots in the state. let's see how different from 2nd term will be in order to see if the 1000 china says it's ready to work for a

we see that literally every month in the south china sea, as they encroach on new territories, they try atolls. and the trouble with this deal is, well, number one, it's totally unnecessary. and there is no basis in international law that we have to do this that stands up. but the worry is that it's a 99 year lease. sounds great. but we had a 50 year deal with china over hong kong — that unravelled. have you given legal advice to the trump team about this? i've given them some fairly extensive briefings on it and on the role of the international criminal court and on thejudgment, the advisoryjudgment that was made. yes, i have and i've been asked for that stuff, and of course i've provided it. right. i want to ask you, do you see your role as representing the interests of the incoming trump administration. i'd like to avoid world war three — that's quite a big consideration for me. but the question is, do you see your role as representing them ? no, my role is to represent people who voted for me here. my role, above all, my role is to protect british interests. yes, i've spent half my

going to criticize xi jinping specifically on human rights, on his expansionist policies in the south china sea and hong kong, his threats against taiwan. i want you to have a chance -- i'm saying this to the various people in china -- i want you to have a chance, and i will take the opportunity to respond and give your point of view. they all signed up. i had agreements, i had letters inviting me back. i came back to new york and applied formally for a journalist visa, and they sat on the request. and my passport and the application sat in the consulate in new york city for several months. i had several meetings with officials. they didn't say no, they just never responded. finally after several months, we had to pull the plug on that. i did find a few people that would speak on behalf of china, government advisors or others, unofficial spokespeople who did speak on camera, and i caught them here when they were visiting the u.s. but the restrictions on media in china are severe. international media is heavily restrictive. and so they never let me in. but we were determined that we would tell t

we've seen the south china sea and some of the activities there. we've seen the tension around taiwan that continues. what makes you nervous or what has your eye in the indo asia pacific right now? >> well, look, we're, we're in a uh geopolitical competition struggle uh with china. uh it's going to be multigenerational. this isn't near term like tomorrow, next day it's going to be over. um and there is the possibility, not the probability but the possibility of armed conflict between two great powers. united states and china. uh china has the natural resource, the people, the population, and most importantly, the money to challenge the united states on a global scale. if you look back when i was, i was commissioned in 1980 i did 44 years of service. during that 44 years, the russian military or the chinese military transitioned from a foot infantry, peasant based foot infantry army with no satellites, no navy, no significant air force, no missile force. then in 1979 deng xiaoping reformed their economy and you know that the chinese economy had a gr

south vietnam, and it was one of the provinces of the central highlands to the jungle. rugged, the rugged jungle covered mountains, extended eastward all the way to the waters edge of the south china sea. and where they didn't extend to the water's of the south china sea, there were narrow coastal lowlands, such as the case in bombing, so long as they were heavily cultivated with rice paddy fields, potato fields, banana groves in and what you. okay, more detail now we see blocks we see blocks lying here and the northeast corner of belden province on the boundary with a core where the marines operated. now, there's two things of significance here. number one, west of banks along there were two major river valleys that fed into the black schilling area, the only valley in, the kimpson valley. both of these valleys were heavily cultivar aided, and both of these valleys had a numerous side or feeder valleys that were heavily forested and provided concealment from aerial observation. an area in ground observation, which made it very hard for the american troops to catch them moving into the blocks killing area and blocks on was one of the most heavily populated areas in south vietnam. and

it's no coincidence for the last 12 days or so china has been very quiet in the east china sea and south is really good news i don't think it a halt but i think they're worried about trump in their giving them a wide berth at the doctor the provocative acts that we've seen so much of over the last four years. >> look at the last four years is by building travel across america and have her around the military. the fentanyl trade pickup, yet the chinese organized crime working with the drug cartels to make sugar during drug trafficking and sex trafficking. the list is long, bullying out service people. >> trying to poison the american political system read as we seen in the city in the state especially ki, with acting chin. this is an important point where we have china using every point of contact to try to take down our society whether were talking about farmland or the senior advisor to the governor of new york. maria: let's talk about the world's largest battery maker, chinese company see atl, building a plant of the united states of trump allows it. the founder chairman told reuters h

s. cares about what happens in the south china sea, and of course, that includes taiwan and it should care. but what happens with russia is the question and ukraine. so a pretty clear stance from call us there, which is to be expected, given her past history on this topic, less clarity on her position only made at least she called for a ceasefire. she called for the release of hostages, and she called for what she said was restraint from all parties. no, that is pretty much the bare minimum in terms of a messaging on it's a pretty, it's a deer shift from her previous test. so you'll set burrell who was really seen as quite an outspoken critic of israeli actions in gaza. she seemed much more hesitant to explicitly offer any kind of criticism. and that change in tone will be welcome to some and really disappointing to others. no, of course that's not the only topic on her list. she will be the european union space in the world. she talks about the big summit with african leaders in 2025 on it, but increasing cooperation on climate change with the carrier be on with less than american co