are we assuming that 10 south van ness is off the table? >> 10 south van ness is pursuing an s.u.d. that will have them produce a higher rate. >> supervisor safai: that's the honda dealership. so then 111, 260 and 344 14th street -- i'm sorry. what i was going to say is, and this is what i brought up last time, and i think i heard you say this in your presentation, the application dates that they submitted

are we assuming that 10 south van ness is off the table? >> 10 south van ness is pursuing an s.u.d. that will have them produce a higher rate. >> supervisor safai: that's the honda dealership. so then 111, 260 and 344 14th street -- i'm sorry. what i was going to say is, and this is what i brought up last time, and i think i heard you say this in your presentation, the application dates that they submitted are all pre-date -- i mean they are three years or older. specific circumstances, i know you said historic. i know you said that each one was working through a series of amendments, and when i look at the math, and then the last one you gave, which was 344 14th street, you said that in the meantime they were applying for the state density bonus, which would increase them up to almost 16.5%. >> that's right. >> 111 turk and 262 7th street. the difference between the grandfathered rate and today would be three or four units. i'd be interested to hear from the project sponsors. >> i believe they are here. >> supervisor safai: as to how that factors into their overall pro forma and th

: this is south van ness? >> well, this is city hall. 1 south van ness and market right next to the bank of america building. >> co-chair blacksten: ok, excellent. so let's see, are there any other comments from staff? i know nicole is on staff and has been talking. anyone else? >> no other comments. >> co-chair blacksten: this has been very good. i really appreciate that. i will be personally putting november 5 on my calendar and i know we'll do our best to work with you. so we want to thank you for making this presentation. >> thank you for inviting me. >> co-chair blacksten: all right. any other comments from the bridge line? no, i don't hear any. i think we have one speaker card? >> we have two actually. >> co-chair blacksten: ok, the first. >> tiffany? >> hi this is tiffany i wanted to make a comment that i'm really excited to see this partnership happening, because part of the reason why i live in san francisco is because of these emerging technologies. and i really think we're at the forefront of it. so

. >> commissioners item nine. 1348 south van ness avenue. certificate of appropriateness. >> good afternoon, commissioners i am from planning. before you is a request for certificate of appropriateness to make exterior and interior alterations to 1348 south van ness avenue. also known as the franklin stone house. located on the west side of south van ness avenue between 24 th street and 25th street. the property asante landmark number 34. the scope of work includes the removal of a one-story rear addition in the construction of a new one-story rear addition. the construction of a new carport and deck in the rear yard, modifications to the existing rear friends, the installation of two new skylights at the rear of the roof, and interior alterations at all levels. the proposed work will be in conformance of the requirements of article ten and the cystic -- secretary of the interior interior his standards for rehabilitation. we find although the rear addition that is proposed to be removed potentially dates the house initial construction, no inf

>> sure, i believe it's 651 geary street, 1515 south van ness, 519 ellis street, 2140 market, and then possibly 524 howard and 430 main. >> supervisor safai: can you say that again slower? 430 main, i got it. >> 430 main, 524 howard. >> supervisor safai: wait a second, please. >> sure. >> supervisor safai: 524 -- okay. >> 2140 market. >> supervisor safai: okay. >> 519 ellis. >> supervisor safai: okay. >> 1515 south van ness. >> supervisor tang: i keep debating, but they committed to 25% affordable housing. >> they did, but that's not in their conditions of approval, so we're just going into what's grandfathered for them. >> supervisor tang: i see. >> supervisor safai: i'm sorry, 15 -- >> 1515 south van ness. >> supervisor safai: okay. >> and 651 geary. >> supervisor safai: and you feel like these will -- what are the reasons why you don't believe they will meet the 18-month deadline? is it because these were all -- >> based on their entitlement dates, we project 18 months out from that, so i believe in the spreadsheet you have before you, you can see 651 geary was entitled on july 7th

the building at south van ness convey a significance under of under california registered criteria one and two. i'll move on to summarize the impacts under the draft related to historic resources. the proposed project in the variety will include demolition of the existing building. the building is eligible, the demolition will impair the significance of the historical resource. it will cause adverse impact. the draft included this can be a significant project impact under ceqa. one measure has been identified to address this exact which priors the project sponsor to take a survey and have documentation of the property including measure drawings and a report to create documentation of the building, to make available print on demand book. this mitigation measure would reduce the severity of the project level impact to the existing individual resource but not to a significant level. it would remain significant. impacts to off site resources are considered to be less than significant. briefly, i'll go over the alternatives that we developed. they analyzed five arrivals including no project

authorize the director of real estate to authorize a lease extension for real property at 755 and 759 south van ness avenue for office space and adjacent parking lot with aim for four-year extension term at the base rent of $45,000 for a total annual base rent of $541,000. >> president cohen: same house, same call? without objection, this resolution is adopted. >> clerk: item 20, retroactively approved the fifth amendment between public works and jc decaux for the automatic public toilet to extend the term by 105 days through january 25, 2019. >> president cohen: same house, same call? this resolution is adopted. >> clerk: item 21, resolution to authorize the police department or sfpd to expend boating safety equipment grant from california department of parks and division of boating and waterways for sfpd's marine unit for october 21, 2018, to september 30, 2019. >> president cohen: same house, same call? without objection, this resolution is adopted. next item. >> clerk: resolution to approve a contract amendment for uncompensated reimbursement between health advocates llc and department of public

a couple of quick notes, 1515 south van ness should not be on this list. they committed to 25% affordable housing. any increase requirement will not impact this project. we should delete that from the list. i want to concur with supervisor peskin, i don't think that we should be extending your grandfathering. a number of these projects, all of them are in the district i represent. one of them as supervisor peskin said, will far exceed our inclusionary housing ordinance and this is the honda site. i want to work on negotiating an extension beyond december 7th. this was just at planning commission on thursday. it's land use on monday with a community report until tomorrow. we did ask the city attorney as supervisor peskin mentioned, to start drafting amendments. they're not going to be ready when you request them at monday 9:00 a.m. and we did try to e-mail you all on the weekend but we understand why you didn't respond to us. i do think that we do need additional time to workout what the -- to right size the extension to be. also have a clear understanding