own constitution only in 1996, 5 years after gaining independence, later than all the former soviet republics trueaving managed to properly build their own state, the ukrainian political top. immediately began to destroy his life according to the law turned out to be a serious challenge. especially. if you have the opportunity to change this law all the time or not comply with it, referring to politics, legal decisions, when the right is replaced by political expediency, the first example of such expediency was the refusal of the verkhovna rada to approve the results of the all-popular referendum of the year 2000, which was initiated by the then president. kuchma, 29 million ukrainians participated in it, but the deputies did not approved. so little by little, the interests of ukrainian politicians replaced the law and destroyed the foundations of statehood on how the process of the collapse of the ukrainian state went.

own constitution only in 1996, 5 years after gaining independence, later than all the former soviet republics true, not having managed to properly build their own state, the ukrainian political top. immediately began to destroy his life according to the law turned out to be a serious challenge. especially. if you have the opportunity to change this law all the time or not comply with it, referring to politics, legal decisions, when the right is replaced by political expediency, the first example of such expediency was the refusal of the verkhovna rada to approve the results of an all-popular referendum in 2000, which was initiated by the then president. kuchma, 29 million ukrainians participated in it, but the deputies did not approve it. so gradually, the interests of ukrainian politicians replaced the law and destroyed the foundations of statehood about how the process of the collapse of the ukrainian state went on in the last 20 years and how ukrainians adapted to this in the plot of anna efimova november, the first official data from the cec were announced. yanukovych won a victory over yushch

own constitution only in 1996, 5 years after gaining independence, later than all the former soviet republics true, not having managed to properly build their own state, the ukrainian political top. immediately began to destroy his life according to the law turned out to be a serious challenge. especially. if you have the opportunity to change this law all the time or not comply with it, referring to politics, legal decisions, when the right is replaced by political expediency, the first example of such expediency was the refusal of the verkhovna rada to approve the results of the national referendum of the year 2000, which was initiated by the then president. kuchma, 29 million ukrainians participated in it, but the deputies did not approve it. so little by little, the interests of ukrainian politicians took the place of law and destroyed the foundations.

true. i think that if one of us had been told in 1980 that in 15 years there would be a war on the territory of the chechen republic, there would be no sovietck, and he walks towards him along the street, he comes up to him and says, well, what's going on, what are the main news? he says russia is at war with ukraine. he says, well, yes, but against whom? yes, it's understandable too. we would have been told in the war of russia in ukraine, i think hardly anyone in this, but let's get the results, i'll show you. uh, the poll we did on the ntv website. you've finished the thought. yes, vladimir trait that really, as never before in the last week and a half, the word of the negotiations. sounds like a constant. i do not believe the west, because in poland there are official training camps for security forces for belarus , a project called paramogo, we have already heard all this. that is, no one will give up their appetites to threaten russia, to undermine the situation inside russia, no one refuses to undermine the situation inside belarus , but the process of negotiations. he must be forced, either under the influence of humanitarian condit

true, then again this state. construction was interrupted and the territories were not asking the population. here in moscow, someone decided to attach them to the ukrainian soviet socialist republicparticipated in the adoption of these decisions and played an important role, which means, as for what is happening today in ukraine, but you know for me again, remembering history. today , the demolition of the monument to pushkin in kharkov was very significant, but those who have been to kharkov must understand that this is not just a monument. this is the oldest monument in kharkov, it is one of their symbols. one of the things to be proud of. whom ekaterina is in odessa already now that's for sure. well, when they say they will remove me, they already said that it is of no historical significance. yes, despite the fact that i'm sorry, but these sculptures yes, as associates, we can destroy a building in kiev, not representing the historical values ​​that we will read do not represent this historical. actually there are many such buildings, but i'm on this why why the bust? e pushkin in kharkov is very important, it also suggests that in the next few days there will be an air strik

of all former soviet republics true, not having time to really build their own state, the ukrainian political elite. immediately began to destroy his life according to the law turned out to be a serious challenge. especially. if you have the opportunity to change this law all the time or not to comply, referring to politics, legal decisions, when the right is replaced by political expediency, the first example of such expediency was the refusal of the verkhovna rada to approve the results of the national referendum in the year 2000, which was initiated by the then the president. kuchma, 29 million ukrainians participated in it, but the deputies never approved it. so gradually, the interests of ukrainian politicians replaced the law and destroyed the foundations of statehood about how the process of the collapse of the ukrainian state went on in the last 20 years and how ukrainians adapted to this in the story by anna efimova on november 22, the first official data from the central election commission were announced. yanukovych won a victory over yushchenko by a margin of almost 3%. what did n