he _ i agree with sowell a brave men, it would he a — i agree with sowell a brave men, it would be ary unwise person who tried to make a judgment over two years— tried to make a judgment over two years for— tried to make a judgment over two years for what's happened in four weeks _ years for what's happened in four weeks a — years for what's happened in four weeks. a person are, let's be clear about— weeks. a person are, let's be clear about it. _ weeks. a person are, let's be clear about it. but — weeks. a person are, let's be clear about it, but the aims that liz truss— about it, but the aims that liz truss has— about it, but the aims that liz truss has put up, growth for the economy, — truss has put up, growth for the economy, getting out of the state we are in_ economy, getting out of the state we are in at— economy, getting out of the state we are in at the — economy, getting out of the state we are in at the moment, everybody will agree _ are in at the moment, everybody will agree with _ are in at the moment, everybody will agree with. the question is how you do it and _ agree

and my answer to that would be the great quote from thomas sowell the stone age man had exactly the sameount of resources that we have in the world today. and the difference between his standard of living and. our standard of living is the knowledge that we can bring to those same resources. and as i said a short while ago, that knowledge is minuscule to what is awaiting humanity, provided that we have human brains and perhaps even a functioning together, cooperate in order to create new knowledge. yeah, i would just to that you're all in this room and there's a reason that you you made the choice to come here. i think that you see something that the general public doesn't see in where we've maybe failed in the last couple of decades is being able to articulate that vision to to these younger people about what we see and what we've seen what we see potentially going forward into the future. they've been told lots of things that by people who proffer it from this fear and so we've got this we've got all these facts on the table but we've got to take these facts and tie them to ideas that

and i call this science in pport of policy next, thomas sowell. this is the greatest. if you remember, experts are called in not pvide factual information or dispassionate analysis, but to political cover for decisions alreadyade based on other conditions. now we, had michael michael levitt nobel pzeinning stanford epidemiologist uninvited from scientific conferences, not for a scientific reason, but because he didn't support the lockdowns as a solution. we had these other scientists thrown off of youtube silenced. it just literally destroyed, tried to destroy careers. so the same thing happening in a climate, but it's because they went against the government funding narrative and the government political narrative and actual photograph of banned students practicing. i'm sure you've seen that. and they'ren their little bubble. in your bubble. good. south south australian authorities use any force necessary. australia had one of the most authoritarian response is next to china and next to new zealand and canada. but i think australia won it because they had the quaranti