there hasn't been a life override since ring is an interesting fact but this court, in this court's spaziano and dobber decision, that's exactly what happened. the jury said we want life. the judge said i'm hearing independent evidence and you're getting death. now, as to the supposed concessions -- confessions in this indication, i'll rely on our brief but the notion that the lawyer said this is a two aggravater case is certainly true. there were two aggravaters charged and we know the trial judge found that two were satisfied. this defendant has been making the ring argument since before ring was decided. he raised this as an aprendi issue at the very first trial. he asked for a bill of particulars for the state to indicate which aggravaters it was going to rely on and he was denied on the ground that aprendi doesn't apply. even, again, the central ring problem in this case, 9 central sixth amendment problem in this case, leaving aside the indetermineacy of 7-5 and maybe three for one and four for the other, is that when a florida sentencing jury finishes its work, there is simply no quest

there hasn't been a life override since ring is an interesting fact, but this court, in this court's spaziano decision, in this court's daubert decision, that's exactly what happened. the jury said we want life. the judge said i'm hearing independent evidence and you're getting death. now, as to the supposed concessions in this case, i think i'll rely largely on our brief. but the notion that the lawyer said, this is a two-aggravator case, is certainly true. there were two aggravators charged. and maybe the jury -- we know that the trial judge found that two aggravators were satisfied. this defendant has been making the ring argument since before ring was decided. he raised this as an aprendi issue at the very first trial. he asked for a bill of particulars for the state to indicate which aggravators it was going to rely on. and he was denied on the grounds that aprendi doesn't apply. again, the central ring problem in this case, the central sixth amendment problem in this case, leaving aside the in ddertimacy which a florida jury finishes its work, there's simple no question. the defendant i