most of the evidence used against me under a process which is widely agreed by those special immigration appeals commission is practitioners as inherently unfair, decisions are made based on closed proceedings which have been described as taking blind shots at a hidden target, that was in quote marks. on their own fact—finding, even the three judges concluded there was not an abundance of said evidence against me. the decision was finely balanced and there was an exchange of activities will stop that has not been reported in the media. the political climate has changed and unfortunately i have fallen victim to this. when relations are goods and chinese investment is sought, and welcome in the uk. when they sell and anti—china stance is taken, i am excluded. sell and anti—china stance is taken, iam excluded. i sell and anti—china stance is taken, i am excluded. i am an independent, self—made entrepreneur. i have always aimed to foster partnerships and build bridges between east and build bridges between east and west, dedicating my professional life in the uk to building links between british and chinese bu

most of the evidence used against me under a process which is widely agreed by those special immigration appeals commission

a judgment from the special immigration appeals commission — that's a semi—secret court — has revealeds h6 has been banned from the uk because he's a threat to national security. the duke's adviser, dominic hampshire, told h6 that he could act for the duke in talks with potential chinese investors. when the security services searched h6�*s phone in 2021, they saw evidence that he might be deceiving the prince to gain influence for the chinese communist party. the court found that h6 had been in a position to generate relationships with prominent uk figures which could be leveraged for political interference purposes. there was a letter from dominic hampshire on the phone. he told h6 that... h6 also had a note of how to handle the duke himself. it said... m15 concluded h6 was working for beijing. there's no suggestion mr hampshire was aware. the bbc has approached him for comment. counterespionage investigators feared the duke had been the target of elite capture. that's the chinese communist party's operation to seek influence across british life. and so the home secretary used her exc

a judgment from the special immigration appeals commission has revealed the chinese man known only as banned from the u.k. because he is a threat to national security. duke advisor told h six he could act for the duke in talks with potential chinese investors. in the security services searched age six phone in 2021 they found evidence he might be deceiving the prince to gain influence in the chinese communist party. the court found h six had been in position to generate relationships with prominent u.k. figures which could be leverage for political interference purposes. it was a letter from dominic hampshire on the phone. he told h six outside of the prince's closest internal confidants, you sit at the top of a tree many people would like to be on. hc had a note of how to handle the duke himself. it said important. manage expectations. really important to not set too high expectaons. he is in desperate situation and will grab onto anything. my five concluded h six was working for beijing. there is no suggestion mr. hampshire was aware. the bbc has approached him for comment. countere

a judgment from the semi—secret special immigration appeals commission has revealed that a man working'd targeted the duke in an operation to influence him. in 2020, h6 became a close confidant with an unusual degree of trust, working with this man, the duke's adviser, dominic hampshire. he gave h6 the green light to act for the duke in talks with chinese investors. when the security services became suspicious and searched h6's phone, they found evidence he was a state agent — a conclusion that doesn't surprise experts. typically, they would go for members of the house of lords or prominent businesspeople or people who, you know, have a voice in the community. it's quite ambitious to target a member of the royal family and quite unwise for a member of the royal family to allow himself to be targeted. the court found that: there was a letter from dominic hampshire on the phone. he told h6 that: h6 also had a note of how to handle the duke himself. it said: counter—espionage investigators feared the duke had been a target of elite capture — that's the chinese communist party's operation

ajudgment from the special immigration appeals commission, a semisecret court, has revealed that a chinese known only as h6 has been banned from the uk because he is a threat to national security. the duke's adviser dominic hampshire told h6 that he could act for the dukein told h6 that he could act for the duke in talks with potential chinese investors. when the security services search h6�*s phone in 2021, they saw evidence that he might be deceiving the prince to gain influence for the chinese communist party. the court found that h6 had beenin party. the court found that h6 had been in a position to generate relationships with prominent uk figures which could be leveraged for political interference purposes. there was a letter from dominic hampshire on the phone. he told h6 that... 0utside hampshire on the phone. he told h6 that... outside of the prince's closest internal confidants, you sit at the top of a tree that many, many people would like to be on. h6 also had a note of how to handle the duke himself. it said, important: manage expectations. really important to not set too high

very, very unusual situation because typically in a case such as this, before the special immigration appeals commissiont court applicants who have been effectively banned from the uk, either as a national security risk because they are a suspected spy, or for or perhaps a suspected terrorist, tend to want to keep their anonymity because of effectively, the potential crushing blow this allegation has to their reputation were it to be public. but mr yang said he wanted to go on the front foot and to be public about this and through his, um, through his lawyers. he told the court that there had been an enormous amount of media reporting and speculation about his relationship with prince andrew, and about his identity and about his activities. and also he was aware of the possibility, the chat that he may get named in parliament and the parliamentary privilege. that's effectively the means by which an mp can say something in parliament, even though there is a reporting restriction in place in court. and therefore mr yang wanted to effectively say publicly who he was to end that speculation and to put his s

the special immigration appeals commission siak that granted zheng bo anonymity also routinely gives those whose cases come before it. one of the very few we know about is shamima begum, but the others we simply don't get told about . simply don't get told about. this cult of secrecy within our institutions is not only contradictory to free speech, but it endangers national security. the role and influence of china in the nation's affairs needs to be understood. it is potentially the biggest threat to the nation. but if alleged spies are not unmasked, how can people evaluate the risk? the whole culture of judicial secrecy is unwelcome in terms of the rule of law, but also potentially dangerous as ever. let me know your views via mailmogg@gbnews.com. but now few people know more about this issue than my next guest, tom tugendhat, who had this to say to gb news earlier today before chagos identity was revealed. >> the labour party is frankly being reckless in reaching out to china as they did at the g20 and as rachel reeves is planning to do in january, without having the proper protec

is a very unusual situation, because typically in a case such as this before the special immigration appeals commissionthe semi—secret court, applicants who have been effectively banned from the uk either as a national security risk because they are as suspected spy or perhaps suspected spy or perhaps suspected terrorist tend to want to keep their anonymity because effectively the potential crushing blow these allegations have to their reputation wear it to be public. mryang reputation wear it to be public. mr yang said reputation wear it to be public. mryang said he reputation wear it to be public. mr yang said he wanted to go on the front foot and be public about this. through his lawyers he told the court that there had been an enormous amount of media reporting and speculation about his relationship with prince andrew and about his identity and about his activities. and also he is aware of the possibility that he may get named in parliament, in the parliamentary privilege, that is effectively the means by which an mp can say something in parliament even though there is a reported restriction in pla