. >> let me just ask more spifically. this is a potentialerrorist whose father went to american authorities and pnted at his son and said, this g is potentiay troublesome, hanging around wh people that are fficult, probably terrorist. >> he' concerned about him, right. >> so a father points to his son and tells american authorities, watch this. >> rit. >> as a result of that, he is no put on a noly list. he doe n have an open visa th is revoked. so there's a two major failures, it seems to me. might have been spelling, might have b something else. might have been ople asleep at the dks, up and down theline. t then in addition to that, in additi to somebody saying, here's the guy, watch him, and we don't wat him, then he gets to an airport with a bomb in his underwear. so how doe he get through a screening at an airport with a bo in his underwea >> ase know, senator, from going back over all the information we have and through the debriefings of mr. abdulmutallab, ofourse who has cooper sin that time, he wase to get throug

agricultural standards and issues and continue to press those when we meet again this all but certain spific cases like stores where we have those we pressed as individually as well. >> if i could secretary locke i want to ask about a separate issue which is what the inspector general recommendation said that no one should withhold its finalization of practical alternatives on the marine operations center but noah went ahead with that process which you think the agency acquisition process is above reproach? >> no our acquisition process is within noe and other agencies of the department of commerce made a thorough review and that is why wesked for separate outside review of the acquisition experts from other federal agenes and private sector to come and who are very concerned about the fact that we have defect consistency and evaluation for instance the new home porting of the ships in the northwest of the inspector general indicated the defects were not sufficient to overturn that and still the award should have gone to the alternate site which was newport but nonetheless -- nonetheless the

and maybe one of the reasons theyidn't want to disclose it is in addition to those exemptions spifically given to labor unions allowing labor unions to be exempt from the disclosure that all other corporations -- not just the major corporations you keep talking about. remember, corporations are the usual associated legal apparatus used by most advocacy groups. so that's who you are talking about. and you keep saying, well, you can have foreign companies and foreign countries under this bill or under this decision by the supreme court, control the message in campaigns, that's just utterly untrue. it wasn't allowed by law before. it wasn't changed by the supreme court decision. at least you should talk about what the law is. it is not true. that's a dog that won't hunt and you keep putting it up here and keep putting it up here and either you haven't read your own bill, you haven't read the supreme court decision or there's anttempt to not tell people exactly what is happening. but one of the reasons i believthat perhaps we didn't get an opportunity to see the latest version of the bill is

peopn seats that havthe car after their name you thoretically will hpe to vote certain ways on the spifics platform issues. and i think the t party isless vement ibad re onan idological feelingsf iplyed by the rules and now all i am being expected t ailout my neigbors mortgage when he put threeetra bathrooms in his house he couldn't afford or i'm frustrated because i expected to pick up the tab or ac compy where the exeutives are flying round on jets and unions ve unsustainablepackages for their employees. it's things along those line where folks have said i played by the rules ani amfrustrated byeing responsible to clean up evybody else's ess. i don't think you can create a national pitical party aroun that. it's more justndnergizing emotion that has been drawn ou bthe high uneloyment and sort of frustration with whatasnt been tackled operly. >> i think if therwas a moment when the tea party could have becomea third probably delete the partit's probably passed in the sense republican poticians i think as david said repubcan politicians who had a different political identy just a few years