are unnecessary if the city were explorer endorsing the existing code and recollection our sprirnldzre a life-saving to tell. >> supervisor kim we've dedicated the housing code you can only do code enforcement in the code we said the majority of buildings have little fire suppression that is not going to help us get the tiff protection in the older buildings that the newer believes are objecting the other issue the sprinkler ordinances fully sprinkled those in the commercial areas that was 3 hundred and 54 buildings when we looked the orderly apartment buildings of 7 or more unit your looking at 20 thousand buildings so from that stand out with the regulatory framework we'll have to consider how to approach this in a manageable way for the plan checking of a partial system it is will be a burden on the fire department it is something to consider i want to make sure you're aware of those numbers. >> yes. and what i understand this argument to be if the city is endorsing the code i understand the fire supersonic is not part of code if the city enforced against clustering blocking for e

reduce a risk by 80 percent so it's a two-fold advantage to have sprirnldz in your residence sprinklers reduce the property loss and water damage because they've activate sooner as you can see in the video about one hundred and 7 sessions a voice-over saying the smoke alarms kwaftsdz and then shortly thereafter you would have had the sprinklers activate they activate at one hundred and 50 dresser so water on the fire sooner than the fire department getting there okay. >> and then this slide shows the history of sprishlgz as you can tell with in communication we're getting to where today sprinklers are required in all buildings where in 2002 when we had the sro ordinance that was just cover an existing 50 with common area coverage you'll see in a couple of slides that increased coverage in the common areas reduced the greater alarm fires we were going to just to give you a quick all of and sprinklers work as you can see in the middle imagine a red glass ball for a standard responses it is 4 millimeters thick in a sprishlg head it is 3 millimeters it takes less time to break once that bul

are unnecessary if the city were explorer endorsing the existing code and recollection our sprirnldzre a life-saving to tell. >> supervisor kim we've dedicated the housing code you can only do code enforcement in the code we said the majority of buildings have little fire suppression that is not going to help us get the tiff protection in the older buildings that the newer believes are objecting the other issue the sprinkler ordinances fully sprinkled those in the commercial areas that was 3 hundred and 54 buildings when we looked the orderly apartment buildings of 7

father owned a business on stockton street there was a fire in a sro above the business there's no sprirnldzhat fire jumped from one sro to other sro to another sro all on top the fire station is literally 6 bloekz blocks away from that location they got driver's license and by the time they got there the blaze jumped so many times from a 3 to 5 alarm they turned around and said if the first year of the ceiling didn't holed up the debris on the water that was coming down the whole block what would have collapsed the fire department said if you guys had sprirnldz in the building in the sro alone the whole block would have had businesses opened in a matter of weeks not months they lost 3 sro's that was a big cost to repay everyone just food for thought. >> thank you very much supervisor kim. >> i want to appreciate everybody being on board and working with our office in preparing for this business thank you ivy there is to legislation being proposed that's why we haven't reached out the rent board we wanted to get the information there's a lot of confusion what was required and not required an