in short, spuc believes it's appropriate given the balance of risk at this point in the program and i'll be happy to answer any questions regarding that memo. following on this from finding, the budget recommendations were to discuss in a report to the state under assembly bill 223, the impact on changes of public safety including changes in the ten year sip. that's one recommendation. the second recommendation was to prevent a staff transition plan and report performance against the plan. so in response, the puc has addressed the public health and safety question, by virtue of addressing level of service goals in the notice of change report from last friday. the report is posted online. the water enterprise will write a separate bill to address the impacts of health and safety due to delays in non wsip project. this will be provided by the end of june. we have the staff transition plan. now, with respect to the health and safety impacts of the march 16 wsip verses the -- this is related to service. wsip has four levels of service, delivery reliability and in this regard, there is a smal