so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those exis

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those exis

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. and surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those existing conditions. a

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those exis

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those exis

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those exis

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. blic works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those existi

so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are. there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a plan view of those exis

>> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments f and g are strithly for the bike and pedestrian path and less on the roadway so we are working with dpw to really look for funding for those segments. at this point segments mn and o are mta led project so use said mta funds- >> supervisor campos. >> thank you, commissioner cohen. what is the completion date for both segments? >> i will flip to the next slide. segment frz mn and o because we have the funding in place we have started that process. we are going to be finishing up preliminary enginee

department will ask sfpd and mta to do double parking enforcement because that is a hazard when a double park vehicle causes a traffic jam mpt i look forward to the conversation squz today we want to preserve the status quo so we can have the conversations. >> agreed and thank you for the comments. at the sake of not gelting in a debate i like to follow up one thing on that. the street width for access and traffic calming devices are not necessarily the same. there is overlap and for the status quo if we work and maintain what we are doing on case by case that applies to trafic calming as well which is for future discussion. i will move on. >> thank you. >> as you know, every 3 yearicize a new cycle. we repeal the current code and adopt the new code and the adoption process we basically for the most part roll oever the majority of the existing code into the new code with minor chairchgs changes. we have 14 or 15 additions which i'll high lited today and speak to any questions you may have. >> if i may >> supervisor peskin. >> at base it seems we have two conflicting safety policy issues that are the subject of these amendments. on the one hand, as supervisor wiene

department will ask sfpd and mta to do double parking enforcement because that is a hazard when a double park vehicle causes a traffic jam mpt i look forward to the conversation squz today we want to preserve the status quo so we can have the conversations. >> agreed and thank you for the comments. at the sake of not gelting in a debate i like to follow up one thing on that. the street width for access and traffic calming devices are not necessarily the same. there is overlap and for the status quo if we work and maintain what we are doing on case by case that applies to trafic calming as well which is for future discussion. i will move on. >> thank you. >> as you know, every 3 yearicize a new cycle. we repeal the current code and adopt the new code and the adoption process we basically for the most part roll oever the majority of the existing code into the new code with minor chairchgs changes. we have 14 or 15 additions which i'll high lited today and speak to any questions you may have. >> if i may >> supervisor peskin. >> at base it seems we have two conflicting safety policy issues that are the subject of these amendments. on the one hand, as supervisor wiene

department will ask sfpd and mta to do double parking enforcement because that is a hazard when a double park vehicle causes a traffic jam mpt i look forward to the conversation squzay we want to preserve the status quo so we can have the conversations. >> agreed and thank you for the comments. at the sake of not gelting in a debate i like to follow up one thing on that. the street width for access and traffic calming devices are not necessarily the same. there is overlap and for the status quo if we work and maintain what we are doing on case by case that applies to trafic calming as well which is for future discussion. i will move on. >> thank you. >> as you know, every 3 yearicize a new cycle. we repeal the current code and adopt the new code and the adoption process we basically for the most part roll oever the majority of the existing code into the new code with minor chairchgs changes. we have 14 or 15 additions which i'll high lited today and speak to any questions you may have. >> if i may >> supervisor peskin. >> at base it seems we have two conflicting safety policy issues that are the subject of these amendments. on the one hand, as supervisor wiener sa

department will ask sfpd and mta to do double parking enforcement because that is a hazard when a double park vehicle causes a traffic jam mpt i look forward to the conversation squz today we want to preserve the status quo so we can have the conversations. >> agreed and thank you for the comments. at the sake of not gelting in a debate i like to follow up one thing on that. the street width for access and traffic calming devices are not necessarily the same. there is overlap and for the status quo if we work and maintain what we are doing on case by case that applies to trafic calming as well which is for future discussion. i will move on. >> thank you. >> as you know, every 3 yearicize a new cycle. we repeal the current code and adopt the new code and the adoption process we basically for the most part roll oever the majority of the existing code into the new code with minor chairchgs changes. we have 14 or 15 additions which i'll high lited today and speak to any questions you may have. >> if i may >> supervisor peskin. >> at base it seems we have two conflicting safety policy issues that are the subject of these amendments. on the one hand, as supervisor wiene