the obama administration reportedly srted investing resources in stepping up the pentagon's cyber capabilities to invest in sabotaging their tests. this weekend in the middle of north korea's birthday celebrations, they attempted to launch a ballistic missile. the launch failed within seconds. even though all signs pointed to north korea taking a sixth stab at a nuclear test this weekend. they didn't do it? and why? we don't exactly know. but since president obama reportedly ordered this shift in strategy to begin investing in cyber and electronic strikes one particular north korean intermediate range missile has had a failure rate of 88% this past year. did the u.s. have anything to do with this weekend's failed missile launch? did the american cyber electronics program have anything to do with north korea's decision not to try another nuclear test. does this new strategic shift ensure a safer united states or

finer: i'm thks once oting puic p,w at s srted pnt i that esentrp o thesetames ate ll andou noto d how he ulanwodn do it iitheoury t fm t at ob sndint, some thing ju h te done ti lie that in vy ion withri ro msa w stro the unedtas at aowuso gunonra the w that tat pplin war. st, wod st say thai they ll ts cme somty owa trun tget assadutf and tn eror t uer syria ioomty of moat pce. ank you. host: driadthpot about the president vilti pitn se can't andf ur whawes re from wn esentrump was pva ciz. isneays t oy as obama wtso tayr i isumre over line aten dnottk sya. jesit t ilaont vi t psident took during ue caai and frankly unl eli ts week. les tblah wre cli romiissipp he aeplin. good morning. chaner i fm host:'mor. michigan. go aad caller: llwh y te thgs out of ntt, tki eaninga ivate citin what y jt id ieaha also but that'sotru fr. i an, you would he g the whole context of wt s going on ithwod that hetrp me os atements. iheless of that you're talking abity iit uted states' national interesthawee had ia mass ex-douse fm at ea caaiit oumc one ould have had ao y soou're approaching, what, half

he srted with boxers. to hockey players. er are studies that are mility personne sohereefity thinking use this ut how to chlogy. i dot know, for instan, how and is approaching it etr theyre welcomi the science in the way thathe nfl be now. haven't spentim reporting onhabu there definitely question foa t sports, hockeyyo know, soccer with and head impact there. martial ts. e're reyeeing what's happeng w with football happen decades ago with boxing. discovered the disease an realized gti hit in the head er and over ain was really damaging. theselayers long after the they were old. stod is calling in from california. odrning, rod. is there -- sort of llowing onha lt question. done obeenery src onneconad toifferences betweethsuon cussive bls? r or leoccer where generally no head trauma long dution and then there' sort ofne sharp impac versus, you know, the experience nffensive lineman in where theyave 40 or c cscussseb -- who have been diagnosed even that e but is -- not the best data beusit oy e players pretty early had the see