that was aligned with some other great opponents for free speech and open internet, china, and iran, sryia, and others -- and syria and others going back. sponsoredld be a u.n. intergovernmental role. what are your thoughts on that? how should we think about the fact that this multistate meeting is being convened in a country and by a government that doesn't have the same level of commitment that the u.s. has demonstrated. what do think of the legal structures for accountability? >> i think it is being convened by both the brazilians and icahn . absencei would say the of the multi-stakeholder idea is that everyone is entitled to come and contribute their views. that is very much in line with the american value of the consent of the government in effect. a camp of people that will be in brazil and arguing that the government should come in and collectively regulate in some way. i believe the purpose of this meeting is to see whether there is substantial enthusiasm for another model, one that would be an icahn model in which governments can come and give their view. civil society will turn o