so we are not concerned about it, but so that the conversation and review is consistent, stacy bradley who runs our planning unit has had the sort of experience of looking at shadows on a variety of projects. and i wonder where stacy might opine whether there would be something that we would view as significant or insignificant? because that is the narrow focus of the commissioner's and for the public, our commission does not weigh-in on planning projects. that is not their function. their function is to analyze whether a development project has -- whether the shadow caused on a park by a development project is both qualitatively and quantitatively significant or insignificant? even if it's significant, it doesn't mean that the project doesn't go forward because the planning department may view the project through a different lens. >> right. thank you. >> thank you. the percentage of the -- the percentage shadow this project will cast on the park is larger than what we typically see. we see -- they have been generally less than .1% new shadow on the park. this is, you know, an order of