the stair penthouse is exempt. >> is there a roof-deck or what's the purpose. >> there is a roof-deck it's a set back. >> that would be a possible change i might entertain the idea of building two large structures there are a lot of people with two or three children and having three or four bedrooms or 4 bedrooms i think that bedroom and 3 and a half bath is fills a lot of needs it would be the same as. >> single-family home but you've got two of them that moinz makes up he i'm not you need that additional deck open the very top it might please turn off all electronic devices. please the neighborhoods but stavpd out in the neighborhood fib you kept it to 34 feet and it's zoned for 34 feet it might be a better project it's sdoentd rh2 as presented i think the sale price was $1.5 million or $1.35 million it is not two year 0 away from mother considered affordable. >> 1.56 so something like that it's anyway not going to accepting sell for less so it's approaching what we not deemed affordable housing by mia any stretch of the imagination i'll be supportive of the project but i would be w

the building measures 34 feet on the mropt. >> that includes the structure on the top. >> the stair penthouse is above that. >> awning you would be close to the 40 foot limit. >> yeah. the stair p

dispassive it the penthouse were removed if the scope and sometime between 1985 and 1990 the stair penthouse and the roof deck were constructed illegal without rectify they were apparently built to the professionally architecture and engineering plans we've done some exploratory disruption to check the if i may the main thing commissioners what are before you are two site permits they're here no planning review the technicalities of the soil and co-hemorrhages maybe aren't properly discussed in this venue if you want to discuss we have a our engineer here but those are planning approval if the commission moves to beginning the beginning dbi brown will check the aspects submitted by the project sponsor and his engineers at this point the consultant and gentleman will have an alp opportunity to look at the dbi safety issues that are part of the normal city review process we know from the planter permit that was referred to and upheld at the proilz the gentleman is not shy in inserting himself onto the process so that opportunity about come should the commissioner paragraph those proprieties th

and have a more moderately he seized unit it's over the height unit once you consider the penthouse fire escape stair landing if he has they've been most receptive in meeting with us but the changes they made were minor they might have already had you know those plans ready this is not an egregious project but it should be better third-story with one modestly priced unit thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker. good afternoon. i'm one of the homeowners on the street thank you for staying this late to hear our concerns pittsburgh it's been a very long day as my husband mentioned we appreciate some of the minimal efforts the architect has made for the proposed height and footprint but we don't feel they've heard our impacts on the neighborhood and specifically open our home i want to support the efforts against the demolition of the third-story we're not opted to alexander units but san francisco has an affordable housing and home and replaces it with two unaffordable homes it's the economic and architecture diversities is clipped away by people rvrp them this chipping away like the goals of th